MaRkYbOy72 Posted November 26, 2007 Share Posted November 26, 2007 Just wondering, does anyone know whether a Mivec GPX FTo is faster 0 to 60 than a N/A with decat and exhaust? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted November 26, 2007 Share Posted November 26, 2007 I would say N/A. My bro had a mivic and it didn`t feel that fast in my opinion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
louisjames Posted November 26, 2007 Share Posted November 26, 2007 mivecs are complete turds. na all day, i frequently thrash my mates mivec. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waderz06 Posted November 26, 2007 Share Posted November 26, 2007 N/A definately. I've raced and beat one before Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guigsy Posted November 26, 2007 Share Posted November 26, 2007 0-60 mph is around 7.5 seconds for the FTO apparently The NA is about 5.7 i think? In conclusion the FTO is slow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
louisjames Posted November 26, 2007 Share Posted November 26, 2007 i wouldnt care in mivec was 3.5, i hate them, such nasty unreliable shit boxs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waderz06 Posted November 26, 2007 Share Posted November 26, 2007 i wouldnt care in mivec was 3.5, i hate them, such nasty unreliable shit boxs. Your a big FTO fan then lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
louisjames Posted November 26, 2007 Share Posted November 26, 2007 as i said, mates got one, and its just a joke. i know others had em too. they worse than bad in every aspect of owning a car. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Havard Posted November 26, 2007 Share Posted November 26, 2007 Fookin ell!! A car that an NA can beat....... I opted out a race with a Hyundai Amica last week for fear of being humiliated....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carl0s Posted November 26, 2007 Share Posted November 26, 2007 0-60 mph is around 7.5 seconds for the FTO apparently The NA is about 5.7 i think? Add at least another second to that I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
louisjames Posted November 26, 2007 Share Posted November 26, 2007 another week lol and head gasket. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miko_supra Posted November 26, 2007 Share Posted November 26, 2007 0-60 mph is around 7.5 seconds for the FTO apparently The NA is about 5.7 i think? In conclusion the FTO is slow wow wish it was that fast Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Havard Posted November 26, 2007 Share Posted November 26, 2007 Add at least another second to that I think. I thought 6.2 was the official 0 - 60 for the NA.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daston Posted November 26, 2007 Share Posted November 26, 2007 NA is around the 6 second mark My MR2 GT used to stick with FTOs no problems so a NA supe shouldnt have any problems at all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
louisjames Posted November 26, 2007 Share Posted November 26, 2007 imo, the only good mitsi has to be the evo. and as they plainly only spent money on development with that one car, so it should be. even the shogun/pajeros are terribly unreliable. not to mention the gto. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ADD Posted November 27, 2007 Share Posted November 27, 2007 Just wondering, does anyone know whether a Mivec GPX FTo is faster 0 to 60 than a N/A with decat and exhaust? N/A all day! How ya gettin on looking for as TT? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carl0s Posted November 27, 2007 Share Posted November 27, 2007 I thought 6.2 was the official 0 - 60 for the NA.. That sounds too quick for a 220bhp heavy car. I'd have though it was 6.8 or something Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Havard Posted November 27, 2007 Share Posted November 27, 2007 That sounds too quick for a 220bhp heavy car. I'd have though it was 6.8 or something Trust me! I'm a bullshitter... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carl0s Posted November 27, 2007 Share Posted November 27, 2007 Trust me! I'm a bullshitter... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt H Posted November 27, 2007 Share Posted November 27, 2007 I had a Colt a while ago with a 1.6 Mivec engine, it was supposed to produce 172bhp (according to mitsubishi), it made 150 on the rolling road, thats with the basic breathing mods which should in theory give it a couple more. What im saying is, MIVEC, doesnt really make a difference, the FTO is a tuned 2 litre, thats it nothing more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael Posted November 27, 2007 Share Posted November 27, 2007 Group buy on crack pipes anyone? Some people in here must be wearing theirs out! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJ Posted November 27, 2007 Share Posted November 27, 2007 Group buy on crack pipes anyone? Some people in here must be wearing theirs out! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colsoop Posted November 27, 2007 Share Posted November 27, 2007 Book figures mean diddly squat. proffessional drivers with no care or mechanical sympathy for the car along with the optimum possible conditions are how those times are set Incidentally how are you going to test this or is it a willy waving contest between mates Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R Black Posted November 27, 2007 Share Posted November 27, 2007 I always thought you would just break into the sixes with a manual & early sevens with an N/A or does the auto work as well on an N/A? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Havard Posted November 27, 2007 Share Posted November 27, 2007 I always thought you would just break into the sixes with a manual & early sevens with an N/A or does the auto work as well on an N/A? Surely someone knows what the official 0 - 60 of an NA Supra was when they were new!! H. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now