Class One Posted October 8, 2007 Share Posted October 8, 2007 Following complaints from Les @ JDP Performance, and in light of impending legal action against the club, I am hereby requesting that no posts or threads are made on this forum regarding JDP Performance that could be perceived as libellous, inflammatory, or potentially reputation damaging, unless you have documented evidence to back up your claims. Regards, Class One Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael Posted October 8, 2007 Share Posted October 8, 2007 Here we go again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muffleman Posted October 8, 2007 Share Posted October 8, 2007 Walob Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hiten55 Posted October 8, 2007 Share Posted October 8, 2007 what's the point of a forum for enthiusiasts and alike if we aren't allowed to express our views on certain topics? so if we have bad dealings with anyone we should keep them quiet? its a sad day when a club gets threatend with legal action rather than a resolve or comprimise being made. Especially when its the members of that club that would spend a lot of money with the company that showed the most support and highest leves of customer service. fine, if thats their attitude, they can stick it - whether they had anything to do with TF or not. they've made their feelings clear, and i for one am happy to not have them here. no great loss, we already have some great traders on here who want our business. my two pence worth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ric Posted October 8, 2007 Share Posted October 8, 2007 what's the point of a forum for enthiusiasts and alike if we aren't allowed to express our views on certain topics? so if we have bad dealings with anyone we should keep them quiet? its a sad day when a club gets threatend with legal action rather than a resolve or comprimise being made. Especially when its the members of that club that would spend a lot of money with the company that showed the most support and highest leves of customer service. fine, if thats their attitude, they can stick it - whether they had anything to do with TF or not. they've made their feelings clear, and i for one am happy to not have them here. no great loss, we already have some great traders on here who want our business. my two pence worth. because you are tarring JDP with the same brush as turbofit, they are not turbofit even though some employees work there. If sombody posted about a company like turbofit like the company i ran when all i had done was take on some of their better employees i think i'd be pretty fu*ked off too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pig Posted October 8, 2007 Share Posted October 8, 2007 In that case why dont we just refer to them as the new turbofit. We all know who they are and a search should reveal. P.S - employ someone else and you wont be refered to as one and the same. You made your bed.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobSheffield Posted October 8, 2007 Share Posted October 8, 2007 my two pence worth. LOL! Specifically which bit of 'no posts or threads are made on this forum regarding JDP Performance that could be perceived as libellous, inflammatory, or potentially reputation damaging' did you not see?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hiten55 Posted October 8, 2007 Share Posted October 8, 2007 because you are tarring JDP with the same brush as turbofit, they are not turbofit even though some employees work there. If sombody posted about a company like turbofit like the company i ran when all i had done was take on some of their better employees i think i'd be pretty fu*ked off too. LOL! Specifically which bit of 'no posts or threads are made on this forum regarding JDP Performance that could be perceived as libellous, inflammatory, or potentially reputation damaging' did you not see?! what im getting at is that they have decided to threaten us with legal action rather than try and rectify the situation somehow. im not saying their work is bad, or that they dont know what they are doing. im not even saying they have anything to do with TF as i simply dont know enough about the whole situation to justify an definate answer. my gripe is the threat rather than comming to a solution. p.s if a mod feels my previous post was a little strong or in anyway going to cause trouble, please feel free to delete/edit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grahamc Posted October 8, 2007 Share Posted October 8, 2007 again, WTF??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedM Posted October 8, 2007 Share Posted October 8, 2007 So the guy has fired the Turbofit people but rather than come on here and introduce himself, explain what's happening and say how much he'd like an undeniably sizeable market to give him a try he decides that the threat of legal action is the correct choice. Doh! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hiten55 Posted October 8, 2007 Share Posted October 8, 2007 So the guy has fired the Turbofit people but rather than come on here and introduce himself, explain what's happening and say how much he'd like an undeniably sizeable market to give him a try he decides that the threat of legal action is the correct choice. Doh! my point exactly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homer Posted October 8, 2007 Share Posted October 8, 2007 p.s if a mod feels my previous post was a little strong or in anyway going to cause trouble, please feel free to delete/edit There is nothing wrong with your comments, they are neither libellous, inflammatory or potentially reputation damaging Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobSheffield Posted October 8, 2007 Share Posted October 8, 2007 I believe the company or companies that this thread legally doesnt refer to have said they wont exactly be focussing on Supras Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedM Posted October 8, 2007 Share Posted October 8, 2007 There is nothing wrong with your comments, they are neither libellous, inflammatory or potentially reputation damaging Can I have a go at all three in one sentence? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hiten55 Posted October 8, 2007 Share Posted October 8, 2007 There is nothing wrong with your comments, they are neither libellous, inflammatory or potentially reputation damaging cool, thanks for clarifying, you can never be sure these days Can I have a go at all three in one sentence? trust you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobSheffield Posted October 8, 2007 Share Posted October 8, 2007 There is nothing wrong with your comments, they are neither libellous, inflammatory or potentially reputation damaging Lol! Riiight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted October 8, 2007 Share Posted October 8, 2007 WTF? Great way to win business. Sorry I was civil to you yesterday Les. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedM Posted October 8, 2007 Share Posted October 8, 2007 WTF? Great way to win business. Sorry I was civil to you yesterday Les. Tosser. Well, that's inflammatory taken care of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jezz Posted October 8, 2007 Share Posted October 8, 2007 Well, that's inflammatory taken care of. Is 'liable' written comments that are untrue? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedM Posted October 8, 2007 Share Posted October 8, 2007 Is 'liable' written comments that are untrue? Kind of. Also, look up 'fair comment' before you say anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gamer Posted October 8, 2007 Share Posted October 8, 2007 Is 'liable' written comments that are untrue? Slander (harmful statement in a transitory form, especially speech) and Libel (harmful statement in a fixed medium, especially writing but also a picture, sign, or electronic broadcast) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted October 8, 2007 Share Posted October 8, 2007 Did he even ask for the offending posts to be removed or went straight into full blown lawyer mode? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homer Posted October 8, 2007 Share Posted October 8, 2007 Did he even ask for the offending posts to be removed or went straight into full blown lawyer mode? At this stage, no; they have not asked for specific posts to be removed. We are awaiting a response from JDP regarding their specific complaint to posts made on the forum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt H Posted October 8, 2007 Share Posted October 8, 2007 tbh i saw this coming, i mean regardless of whether its just or not the forum has been laying waste to JDP on a regular basis! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustGav Posted October 8, 2007 Share Posted October 8, 2007 Can he in fact prove he doesn't EVER toss pancakes or otherwise? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts