tbourner Posted September 28, 2007 Share Posted September 28, 2007 Are you honestly suggesting that the first page of posts didn't include some people who were truelly amused by the video? And they were all in fact just being sarcastic? Or are you trying to claw back your morals in front of those of us who disagreed with the thing to start with? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael Posted September 28, 2007 Share Posted September 28, 2007 * I have asterisk all areas in my post where sarcasm was used, this to highlight it for those who have a complete inability to detect it. In what way is the "drama queen" bit sarcastic? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Ads Posted September 28, 2007 Share Posted September 28, 2007 Are you honestly suggesting that the first page of posts didn't include some people who were truelly amused by the video? And they were all in fact just being sarcastic? Or are you trying to claw back your morals in front of those of us who disagreed with the thing to start with? Im sure some people were amused by it, thats not who my post was aimed at. I never agreed with the post in the first place, my morals are happy where they are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECK Posted September 28, 2007 Share Posted September 28, 2007 Im sure some people were amused by it, thats not who my post was aimed at. I never agreed with the post in the first place, my morals are happy where they are. there is alot of bra strap pinging in this thread the best of it is im willing to bet the squirrel diddnt even get hurt:taped: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted September 28, 2007 Share Posted September 28, 2007 Why Pete should feel he should apologise and justify his posts is beyond me. That's just the kinda guy I am. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted September 28, 2007 Share Posted September 28, 2007 there is alot of bra strap pinging in this thread What's bra strapping? I don't wear a bra. CW does, but he won't like me telling you that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Wilson Posted September 28, 2007 Share Posted September 28, 2007 It's really not a problem Pete, I have come to terms with it I can't believe how easy it is to wind people up here, five minutes in the Ash pub would have some folks hyper ventilating.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted September 28, 2007 Share Posted September 28, 2007 I can't believe how easy it is to wind people up here, five minutes in the Ash pub would have some folks hyper ventilating.... Especially if you're dressed as Michael Jackson eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tricky-Ricky Posted September 28, 2007 Share Posted September 28, 2007 For Christ sake! What a drama queen*. Why Pete should feel he should apologise and justify his posts is beyond me. Each one written in jest, and dipped in sarcasm. As for comparing this to peoadphillia; Slinging a squirrel across you back garden… Raping a child Squirrel slinging… Child raping Squirrel slinging… Child raping Squirrel slinging… Child raping Identical*. I’m not for sed squirrel catapult, just against some of the ridiculous replies in this thread. * I have asterisk all areas in my post where sarcasm was used, this to highlight it for those who have a complete inability to detect it. You really need to get your facts straight fella! try reading my post, and stop tailoring its content to suit you deliberate stylised take on it! and you have obviously faild to take in the fact that my mention of "pedofiles" was desigened to generate strong feelings! just like the "animal cruelty"! in this thread! Due to its content it has generated strong feelings, the ridiculous part is that some people have just set out to wind others up! so before it ends in degenerating more i think it should be locked! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted September 28, 2007 Share Posted September 28, 2007 Wow, that's a lot of exclamation marks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Haggas Posted September 28, 2007 Share Posted September 28, 2007 For Christ sake! What a drama queen*. Why Pete should feel he should apologise and justify his posts is beyond me. Each one written in jest, and dipped in sarcasm. As for comparing this to peoadphillia; Slinging a squirrel across you back garden… Raping a child Squirrel slinging… Child raping Squirrel slinging… Child raping Squirrel slinging… Child raping Identical*. I’m not for sed squirrel catapult, just against some of the ridiculous replies in this thread. * I have asterisk all areas in my post where sarcasm was used, this to highlight it for those who have a complete inability to detect it. Oh please,I really dont recall asking for ,or indeed Pete feeling the need to apologise.I can only assume you feel he should?Why mention it otherwise? I was merely stating the fact that his post was not the normal post I would have expected from him. That was my opinion and he had his opinion. I really couldnt get on with drama at school,although I feel I may now have graduated!Many thanks for your encouragement Big ads...(now that is sarcasm). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim_supra Posted September 28, 2007 Share Posted September 28, 2007 Found these. Anybody's? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShamelessTT Posted September 28, 2007 Share Posted September 28, 2007 Shame that something that was a light hearted post to make people giggle (did me) has turned into a bit of a flaming session. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tbourner Posted September 28, 2007 Share Posted September 28, 2007 It's worse than the Red Arrows thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Ads Posted September 28, 2007 Share Posted September 28, 2007 You really need to get your facts straight fella! Not about facts mate, all about this comment: people who are entertained by animal cruelty are as bad as paedophiles in my books! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tricky-Ricky Posted September 28, 2007 Share Posted September 28, 2007 Not about facts mate, all about this comment: In this case it is, you Left out "IMO" and as far as i am concerned i stand by my comment! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted September 28, 2007 Share Posted September 28, 2007 Fight! fight! fight! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Ads Posted September 28, 2007 Share Posted September 28, 2007 of course it's your opnion. I'm just giving my opinion regarding yours Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShamelessTT Posted September 28, 2007 Share Posted September 28, 2007 Its a rat with a bushy tail FGS Hehe! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveK Posted September 28, 2007 Share Posted September 28, 2007 Shame that something that was a light hearted post to make people giggle (did me) has turned into a bit of a flaming session. To be honest, I think the fact that you giggled is the shame. Since I joined a year ago, there have been a couple of "My dog / cat just got run over / put down" threads. I guess it would be OK if I find future threads like that amusing? I don't know these animals, so why should I care? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Branners Posted September 28, 2007 Share Posted September 28, 2007 wildly differing views on this thread and those who found it funny will no doubt feel the same now as they did when they first LOL'd at the flying budget monkey, and those who felt it was shocking and cruel will no doubt still feel the same way now after the discussions. Not sure this is going anywhere (unless you have a spare colendar and some bungee cord) so perhaps time to lock it. JB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts