Havard Posted July 11, 2007 Share Posted July 11, 2007 WTF!!! JAKE i have just seen your homepage you are f**kin twisted but on that note are they any good:) http://daimaoh.kir.jp/ho/menssom.htm Reminds me of a limerick I once heard!! There was a young man from Goose Green Who invented a wanking machine On the 99th Stroke The bloody think broke And battered his balls to ice cream...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Havard Posted July 11, 2007 Share Posted July 11, 2007 Sorry, double post!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Havard Posted July 11, 2007 Share Posted July 11, 2007 What don't you agree with me about? That there's no-one for you to argue with.... H. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter richards Posted July 11, 2007 Share Posted July 11, 2007 theres a rumour that a family have moved into edds street the diq family , mustafa , and kanu-suka :p Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ivan Posted July 11, 2007 Author Share Posted July 11, 2007 LOL, sorry Jake. Corrected now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Geneb Posted July 11, 2007 Share Posted July 11, 2007 Just been to my first muslim party.... musical chairs was a bit slow , but fuck me pass the parcel was quick!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
penguin Posted July 11, 2007 Share Posted July 11, 2007 Not at all H. But I would like to see the ones who stirred up so many of those arguments post their comments in here. Imi just happens to be one of them. Another has already posted. huh? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
penguin Posted July 11, 2007 Share Posted July 11, 2007 Just been to my first muslim party.... musical chairs was a bit slow , but fuck me pass the parcel was quick!!!! you could use a little more chlorine in your gene pool Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
s3upra Posted July 11, 2007 Share Posted July 11, 2007 Not at all H. But I would like to see the ones who stirred up so many of those arguments post their comments in here. Imi just happens to be one of them. Another has already posted. You mean Tweedledum and Tweedledee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedM Posted July 11, 2007 Share Posted July 11, 2007 You mean Tweedledum and Tweedledee Tweedledum and Tweedleevendumber! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SupraChick Posted July 11, 2007 Share Posted July 11, 2007 I think they should bring back the death penalty for that kind of offence so, IMO, they got off lightly. Agreed, now us tax payers have to pay for them to get food, accomodation, education etc etc etc.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hogmaw Posted July 11, 2007 Share Posted July 11, 2007 You lot clearly obviously haven't thought the sentencing through properly. Death penalty, torture, eye-for-an-eye etc is wrong on all counts, this is a civilised country. If you want reprimands like that - go and live in a country that treats its criminals like that. I tell you 40 years - minimum - in jail is no picnic. Best years of your life and all that. Imagine it, minute after minute, hour after hour, day after day, week after week - getting buggered, abused, and beaten. The sentencing was correct. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Havard Posted July 11, 2007 Share Posted July 11, 2007 Agreed, now us tax payers have to pay for them to get food, accomodation, education etc etc etc.. And the difference to them being free is??? H. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
s3upra Posted July 11, 2007 Share Posted July 11, 2007 You lot clearly obviously haven't thought the sentencing through properly. Death penalty, torture, eye-for-an-eye etc is wrong on all counts, this is a civilised country. If you want reprimands like that - go and live in a country that treats its criminals like that. I tell you 40 years - minimum - in jail is no picnic. Best years of your life and all that. Imagine it, minute after minute, hour after hour, day after day, week after week - getting buggered, abused, and beaten. The sentencing was correct. 40 years minimum?-Dont make me laugh,they will be out in 10,either for political reasons,or because the Home office accidently lets some more prisoners out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hogmaw Posted July 11, 2007 Share Posted July 11, 2007 40 years minimum?-Dont make me laugh,they will be out in 10,either for political reasons,or because the Home office accidently lets some more prisoners out. How do you know that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Havard Posted July 11, 2007 Share Posted July 11, 2007 You lot clearly obviously haven't thought the sentencing through properly. Death penalty, torture, eye-for-an-eye etc is wrong on all counts, this is a civilised country. If you want reprimands like that - go and live in a country that treats its criminals like that. I tell you 40 years - minimum - in jail is no picnic. Best years of your life and all that. Imagine it, minute after minute, hour after hour, day after day, week after week - getting buggered, abused, and beaten. The sentencing was correct. Interesting theory!! I suppose it depends on the prison but a lot of the ones I have been in were too comfy for my liking. I am very right wing about punishment but this country doesn't seem to deter people from behaving badly. We are also poor at detecting crime so it is even more soul destroying when the justice system is not tough enough on the people who are caught. I agree though, we do live in a civilised country but I think that for crimes like this and against children etc, maybe the ultimate punishment is needed as a deterant...... If these b@stards had been successful then 100's of people may have died and countless others lives would have been destroyed due to injury or bereavement and for what?? H. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Posted July 11, 2007 Share Posted July 11, 2007 I think that for crimes like this and against children etc, maybe the ultimate punishment is needed as a deterant. How would the death penalty be a deterrent to a attempted suicide bomber? The death penalty is not a deterrent anyway. It hasn't measurably lowered crime in the US states that have reintroduced it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
s3upra Posted July 11, 2007 Share Posted July 11, 2007 How do you know that? I have watched the news for 10 years:d Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hogmaw Posted July 11, 2007 Share Posted July 11, 2007 I have watched the news for 10 years:d Exactly. The news only reports NEWS ie abberations and interesting situations, not real life. Cos real life isn't interesting - it's not interesting news to say "Britain's population of 80,000+ prisioners did NOT leave their sentences early today" is it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
s3upra Posted July 12, 2007 Share Posted July 12, 2007 Exactly. The news only reports NEWS ie abberations and interesting situations, not real life. Cos real life isn't interesting - it's not interesting news to say "Britain's population of 80,000+ prisioners did NOT leave their sentences early today" is it? Presumably you think the news is a huge conspiracy theory, Next your gonna tell me Lee Harvey Oswald shot Diana:d Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Posted July 12, 2007 Share Posted July 12, 2007 Presumably you think the news is a huge conspiracy theory, Next your gonna tell me Lee Harvey Oswald shot Diana:dHuh? I'm confused. Your reply seems to bear no relevance to the post you were replying to Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
s3upra Posted July 12, 2007 Share Posted July 12, 2007 Huh? I'm confused. Your reply seems to bear no relevance to the post you were replying to Well it all made perfect sense to me:blink: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hogmaw Posted July 12, 2007 Share Posted July 12, 2007 Presumably you think the news is a huge conspiracy theory, Next your gonna tell me Lee Harvey Oswald shot Diana:d Not at all, what I am saying is that the news can easily distort the truth, and hence public opinion, by reporting as news a one-off or an anomaly that people then believe is gospel and happens all the time. For instance, a plane crashes, leading to many deaths. As a result, some people become petrified and refuse to travel by plane. Despite the fact that compared to bikes/cars/trains etc it's the safest mode of transport! So you will have seen somewhere that some prisoners were released early or whatever, national scandal etc etc, and therefore assume that the same will happen to the terrorists that were locked up today. Which isn't necessarily gonna happen, unless you're either a cynic, or gullible - which one are you?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
s3upra Posted July 12, 2007 Share Posted July 12, 2007 Not at all, what I am saying is that the news can easily distort the truth, and hence public opinion, by reporting as news a one-off or an anomaly that people then believe is gospel and happens all the time. For instance, a plane crashes, leading to many deaths. As a result, some people become petrified and refuse to travel by plane. Despite the fact that compared to bikes/cars/trains etc it's the safest mode of transport! So you will have seen somewhere that some prisoners were released early or whatever, national scandal etc etc, and therefore assume that the same will happen to the terrorists that were locked up today. Which isn't necessarily gonna happen, unless you're either a cynic, or gullible - which one are you?! Well i believe im a realist-guess you would describe me as a cynic;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hogmaw Posted July 12, 2007 Share Posted July 12, 2007 I'm both - but on this one I'm a realist, and I would be very, very surprised if any of those men got released a day earlier than their time is due. So much shit would come down it would be unreal. They haven't let Myra Hindley out yet have they? How many years is that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.