Tourniquet Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 Has anyone seen this on Flea-bay yet. Sorry haven't got a link having said that but there's only 2 pages worth of Supra's on there and it's the 1st of page 2. Wot's peoples oppinions on it or does anyone know it ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Franko Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 Well its the 2nd time its been on ebay in 2 months cos when i was trying to buy one i remember seeing it. And there from different locations i think Makes me think there is something seriously wrong with it else the guy just cant handle what he bought!. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRD-Rob Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 here you go Ive alway liked the look of the car and i always will http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/TOYOTA-SUPRA-3-0-RZ-TWIN-TURBO-400BHP-FAST-FURIOUS-REPL_W0QQitemZ170126427104QQihZ007QQcategoryZ18290QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
couv3z Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 thats not a replica.... the one in the film was a N/a and nice HKS fuse cover Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitesupraboy2 Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 out of date looks now, but does look like good workmanship and a worthy replica. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neil tt Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 Shame someone couldn't be bothered to clean under the bonnet, and the HKS stickers are something special:d Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
markrzs Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 what about the twin jet turbines in the boot ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silvershark44 Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 thats not a replica.... the one in the film was a N/a and nice HKS fuse cover The engine they show on the wrecked car is an N/A engine true. But that is just a film mistake. They used a real car and it was a single turbo 6 speed aero top producing around 650 bhp. The car exists somewhere! As for this replica, in my opinion, if you are going to do it, do it properly. First of all....... Its not an Aero-top Decals dont look quite right No Interior roll cage Stupid subs in the back Rear spoiler is wrong And they wheels arent right!! - any fan knows the real supra had 19" racing harts on it. Its not a manual too Im also not convinced that its the true lamborghini colour. Just doesnt quite look right. Though could just be the lighting. But I suspect they cheaped out on a copy colour. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJI Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 nice show car if thats what you want it for but way OTT and chavtasic for a road car IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pistonbroke Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 The engine they show on the wrecked car is an N/A engine true. But that is just a film mistake. Its not a mistake mate, when the dude with attention definciency disorder 'pops the hood' He says "wow, 2jze engine" not '2jzgte', and its an aerotop like you say, so it would have had to be an NA as the aerotop never came in TT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silvershark44 Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 Its not a mistake mate, when the dude with attention definciency disorder 'pops the hood' He says "wow, 2jze engine" not '2jzgte', and its an aerotop like you say, so it would have had to be an NA as the aerotop never came in TT. The Aero- top never had a six speed gertrag either but the car in the film does does. It a mistake in the film Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silvershark44 Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 There you go, just to prove im right! http://www.rsportscars.com/eng/cars/supra_fastandfurious.asp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pistonbroke Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 The car that is in the film, at some point had an NA lump in it. which means it never used to have a getrag box in it. The running gear has obviously been changed, I still don't get how its a film mistake. ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 The Aero- top never had a six speed gertrag either but the car in the film does does. yes it did, try telling that to 99% of US supra owners Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitesupraboy2 Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 yes it did, try telling that to 99% of US supra owners correct I believe in the US they did. In the US most supras are aerotops. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silvershark44 Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 The car that is in the film, at some point had an NA lump in it. which means it never used to have a getrag box in it. The running gear has obviously been changed, I still don't get how its a film mistake. ? Right................ The Orange supra is supposed to be a TT - infact single turbo on a 2 JZ GTE The crashed car they bring in, is just a random crashed car from a scrap yard. It happens to have the wrong engine in as no one noticed. But its supposed to be a TT engine. The orange car exists in real life, they used it in filming and along with a lot of other replicas eg for the crash seen etc it produced 650bhp approx from a single turbo on a 2 JZ GTE. There were probably N/A replicas used on set as well. Doesnt mean that the car isnt supposed to be a TT. Follow the link its all there. Why would you knowing use the N/A engine in the fast and the furious? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silvershark44 Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 correct I believe in the US they did. In the US most supras are aerotops. really? didnt know that. I still stand by saying that the fast and the furious supra isnt supposed to be an N/A. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitesupraboy2 Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 really? didnt know that. I still stand by saying that the fast and the furious supra isnt supposed to be an N/A. Course its not. They made a mistake or most likely..... They use about 5 replica cars, one being a TT, the other 4 are for crash scenes After one crash scene they take the broken NA wreck and set it on fire and dirty it up to make it look really beaten up for that scene. Saving thousands of $$$$ being wasted on another car. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silvershark44 Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 Course its not. They made a mistake or most likely..... They use about 5 replica cars, one being a TT, the other 4 are for crash scenes After one crash scene they take the broken NA wreck and set it on fire and dirty it up to make it look really beaten up for that scene. Saving thousands of $$$$ being wasted on another car. Actually thinking about it the supra doesnt chash, its the charger that does. Vin diesel escapes in the supra at the end. Possibly the best get away car ever? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest gzaerojon Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 And they wheels arent right!! - any fan knows the real supra had 19" racing harts on it. he needs my wheels on it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 when the dude with attention definciency disorder 'pops the hood' He says "wow, 2jze engine" not '2jzgte', and its an aerotop like you say, so it would have had to be an NA as the aerotop never came in TT. You're wrong on both counts there matey. He says "Two Jay Zee" not "Two Jay Zee Eee" and there's loads of aerotop TTs The car that is in the film, at some point had an NA lump in it. which means it never used to have a getrag box in it. 6sp NAs with the Getrag do exist. They're not common but were made. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CardiffSupra Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 Don't like it at all, I can't say there is one thing a like about the car tbh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tourniquet Posted July 1, 2007 Author Share Posted July 1, 2007 Right won't buy it for a single project then lol. I just thought in the film it was a cheap shitter that they threw "ten grand's worth of over night parts from Japan" at and turned it from whatever kind of Aerotop it was into a 6 speed big single turbo Ferrari killing Supra - imo the ultimate Supra. 6 speed topless big single - I want ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grahamc Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 Right won't buy it for a single project then lol. I just thought in the film it was a cheap shitter that they threw "ten grand's worth of over night parts from Japan" at and turned it from whatever kind of Aerotop it was into a 6 speed big single turbo Ferrari killing Supra - imo the ultimate Supra. 6 speed topless big single - I want ! nice idea, but I would skip the aeroptop... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silvershark44 Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 nice idea, but I would skip the aeroptop... But if its a true replica, it has to be an aerotop. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.