Keith C Posted May 12, 2002 Share Posted May 12, 2002 Well, I've found the source of one of my oil leaks - it's the engine mounts! Turns out they're leaking big time. Has anyone else had this, and if so, what did it cost to get it repaired? Cheers Keith Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terminator Posted May 12, 2002 Share Posted May 12, 2002 Keith, I thought engine mounts were just rubber blocks in metal cups. So where does the oil come into it or out of it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terminator Posted May 12, 2002 Share Posted May 12, 2002 If the leak is on the near side, then it may be the oil filter bracket -oil cooler union or just a loose fliter. Any leak in this area could cover the engine mount in oil. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Myles Posted May 12, 2002 Share Posted May 12, 2002 ...according to that infallible source of info http://www.mkiv.com ,it shows an extract from the manual & some pics , though I would have thought failure/leakage would manifest itself by the mount rattling , as opposed to signs of the fluid ... there can't be all that much fluid in there . Myles Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keith C Posted May 12, 2002 Author Share Posted May 12, 2002 No, my Dad and I got it over a pit and he had a good old look underneath, and it's *definitely* the mounts - it's from both sides of the engine too. As for *why* they're oil filled - I dunno? There's certainly a lot less fluid in them now though, that's for certain. I haven't heard any rattling, we just looking underneath as we were chasing what appeared to be a brake fluid leak. That in the end turned out to be a worn-out hose on the diff oil cooler. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Martin F Posted May 12, 2002 Share Posted May 12, 2002 Originally posted by Keith C As for *why* they're oil filled - I dunno? There's certainly a lot less fluid in them now though, that's for certain. NVH Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Harwood Posted May 13, 2002 Share Posted May 13, 2002 Originally posted by Martin F NVH Eh? :conf: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Martin F Posted May 13, 2002 Share Posted May 13, 2002 Noise Vibration Harshness Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Digsy Posted May 13, 2002 Share Posted May 13, 2002 Old-skool engine mounts used to just be blocks of rubber, usually with air voids in them so as to make them compliant on one direction and stiff in another, thereby controlling the ways in which the engine can vibrate while still supporting its mass. Basically the rubber acted as a crude spring. Advanced engine mounts use the "Hydramount" type of design where you have rubber and voids filled with a fluid. The whole module is like a little integrated spring / damper arrangement and gives much better control over the engine vibration and isolation from the chassis. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keith C Posted May 13, 2002 Author Share Posted May 13, 2002 Well, it's not as bad as I feared. My local Toyota garage want £300+vat for the job, and I'll probably get them to do the cambelt at the same time (another £200 quid ). Not too bad really. I would consider taking it round to Leon, but the sheer ease and convenience of the local garage, plus it'd cost me a fair bit in juice to get there, means I may as well get it done local. Also means that if something goes wrong (not saying Leon would do a bad job, but you know what I mean), it's a bit easier to get the car to them and say 'sort it'. Cheers for everyone's input though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terminator Posted May 13, 2002 Share Posted May 13, 2002 Learn something every day:eek: I checked out the MKIV ref and sure enough fluid pockets two in each. The mounts have been redesigned with the fluid at the top to slow heat transfer to the rubber. Looks like a design fault. Anyone changed these yet or know if it is a DIY job.? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Martin F Posted May 13, 2002 Share Posted May 13, 2002 By the way the later mounts have a tendency to fail. The older type (93-95 I think) are more robust. Our American friends have seen quite a few of these failures on later cars. Also TRD do make upgraded engine mounts, but i'm not sure how easy they are to get hold of, also noise would be increased. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Myles Posted May 13, 2002 Share Posted May 13, 2002 ... since you don't live a million miles away from me , I wondered who you'd entrust you car with? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keith C Posted May 13, 2002 Author Share Posted May 13, 2002 I'm using McCarthy in Sidcup. I know Rob on here has a bit of a nasty one with them when they did his cambelt, but I've used them for years and and not had any probs, as have my parents. They're quite happy to work on imports too, with no premium. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Myles Posted May 13, 2002 Share Posted May 13, 2002 Thanks for the info. Keith . I posted a similar query on one of the earlier versions of the BBS , as I'm getting symptoms as described on the US mkiv site ;`popping' noise when taking up drive & on left-right-left turns - like on medium roundabouts .... but no sign of any oil leaks . I've used McCarthy in the past & they came across as very professional ... although I was suspicious when they suggested the exhaust manifold on my then 5 year old celica would soon need replacing due to rust !? ..... let us know how you get on . Myles Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.