Lucifer Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 personally I thik it is a good idea. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedM Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 personally I thik it is a good idea. Why? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
markssupra Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 Why? Because if it is a crock of sh!t, it be wont be too long before something similar happens. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyT Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 Signed and thanks for the info. What a crock.....Useless f***** Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 It's a crock. There is no evidence for this whatsoever. Has anyone even bothered Googling this subject? I doubt it. There is something in the EU to prevent certains cars from entering certain parts of cities of that days pollution levels are high but that's in Germany at the moment. Anyone signing the petition against enforced weekly drug testing at work? There's no proof that it's going to happen but I'm going to create a petition regardless. See post #9 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucifer Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 Why? Some contries already adopt this (forgot which) and it keeps the roads clear of crappy poluting cars. (like ours I guess) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedM Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 Some contries already adopt this (forgot which) and it keeps the roads clear of crappy poluting cars. (like ours I guess) Sorry, I'm not following your logic. That's a good thing why? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucifer Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 Sorry, I'm not following your logic. That's a good thing why? Im thinking of the bigger picture, teh Environment. Its really getting quite important now that we clean up our act. If it doesnt go through, theyll just tighten up MOT emmissions. Either way they are gonna get us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedM Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 Im thinking of the bigger picture, teh Environment. Its really getting quite important now that we clean up our act. If it doesnt go through, theyll just tighten up MOT emmissions. Either way they are gonna get us. I think we should force the govt. to acknowledge that there are far bigger polluters than car owners. Sadly those polluters can bring govts. down whereas we roll over, take it up the arse then tell them it's okay if they do it again. Whatever happened to all the big talk from car owners about fuel, tax etc? Nothing happened. The time to take a stand is coming and if we don't do anything then our govt. will actually be limiting our personal freedoms in order to allow big business some leeway in their behaviour. When they limit their pollution so will I. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 Im thinking of the bigger picture, teh Environment. Its really getting quite important now that we clean up our act. If it doesnt go through, theyll just tighten up MOT emmissions. Either way they are gonna get us. Emmissions my arse... Global Warming is a con - a con to tax the crap out of us. This year is an El Nino year and it'll be hot....it's normal...but the govt will ignore that because they can't tax a natural phenomenon...so they'll make one up. And as for cars polluting, have you seen the data, they make up Labour will be booted out way before this all happens... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedM Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 Emmissions my arse... On the beans again? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 On the beans again? Actually yes, thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soonto_HAS_soop Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 Their goes the MGA and the newly aquired E Type resto project.... Bunch of wankers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ark Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 (">" is "less than" isn't it?) No. Wrong way round. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 No. Wrong way round. Thanks always get them confused Edited...so this won't make sense Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ark Posted April 25, 2007 Share Posted April 25, 2007 When I learned this at school (aged maybe 5!) I was taught to think of the symbol as a crocodile, eating the bigger number. So 6 is greater than 5: 6>5. Easy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.