Jump to content
The mkiv Supra Owners Club

Mate threatened with legal action - insanity lol


Kopite

Recommended Posts

My mate set up a website to show off a local girls footyteam, whitchurchgirlsfootball.co.uk or something. He's had a letter from Prada saying that as they own the Church shoes line, he has infringed on "their rights" by using the word church in his domain and they are threatening action unless he withdraws the site and sign and returns a letter sayin he will do so lol. Anyone think they'll get anywhere? He's sent the letter on to Watchdog.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely they can't have a hope? Because they own the church shoes line, that would mean no website is allowed the word church in it?

 

I'm wary of even saying this after the Passion of Christ thread - but I wonder how the C of E feels about that!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope, they can't claim prior art on the word church for goodness sake, tell them to swivel...

 

Also, you probably find it is an agency which checks these things and not prada themselves.... might even find they will be trying to selling to Prada in order to 'protect' their name..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some jumped up little drongo trying to sniff the boss's a-hole - tell em to go for it and meet em in court - not a leg to stand on... and besides one has to ask how a major player like Prada found out about Whitchurch ladies footie team..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tell them to shove it. You can't stop people using the name of a place in the domain name!!

 

Surely God and the Clergy should be suing Prada for naming their shoes after their place or worship etc etc...

 

The world is going barking mad!! :rolleyes:

 

Just told the wife never to buy Prada. She said, "chance would be a fine thing"!! Whatever that means......;)

 

 

 

H.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I used to manage a web site and had all sorts of letters/emails threatening prosectution for this that or the other copyright infringement.

Dealt with them swiftly by filing them on hard drive (just in case) and then writing a long letter 'in Icelandic' (a friend did the translation) asking for a detailed explanation of their case within 3 working days of receipt so I could take the appropriate action.

I never got another response.

I cant think why!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the way they said they weren't aware Whitchurch was a place name. WTF did they think it was? In any case, trademarks like these are only valid in the same field as the company involved. I could call myself Toyota and sell bananas or something and it wouldn't be a clash AFAIK. Madness!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My friend had the same problem with djnike.com/uk or whatever it is. however he was a plonker and used the swoosh graphic. he just wrote them a nice letter and said "if you look at the site you will see your just a bunch of idiots and i have nothing to do with nike inc. ill remove the swoosh... happy now?" They let him off

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember the guy who runs Nice And Safe Attire, back in the 90's got a stiff letter from NASA, but in that case, NASA had it's own range of baseball caps and flight jackets and stuff.

 

Oh, and Microsoft complained about either M&S or Asda selling underwear branded with a microsoft fabric.

 

 

God, imagine if some idiot tried to sue people for using, say, BPU as an everyday phrase.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. You might also be interested in our Guidelines, Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.