markjodrell Posted April 15, 2007 Share Posted April 15, 2007 Just looking through the post re letting supra-lover back on, tried to go to page two and get the message below, any ideas ??????????? :( markjodrell, you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons: Your user account may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or a members only section? Please see here for details of what sections are only available to club members. If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation. Log Out Home Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uk-rich Posted April 15, 2007 Share Posted April 15, 2007 its a secret Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colsoop Posted April 15, 2007 Share Posted April 15, 2007 It probably all kicked off again and the thread was removed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamieP Posted April 15, 2007 Share Posted April 15, 2007 Strange the thread has gone, i was only reading it 20min ago:search: there was nothing bad in it and the mods had agreed to let him back on a 1 month trial period:) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
markjodrell Posted April 15, 2007 Author Share Posted April 15, 2007 Strange the thread has gone, i was only reading it 20min ago:search: there was nothing bad in it and the mods had agreed to let him back on a 1 month trial period:) I think it has been removed , I was reading page 1 and when I tried to go to page 2 I got the message, must have been removed before I went to next page , ODD :search: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Todd Posted April 15, 2007 Share Posted April 15, 2007 the mods had agreed to let him back on a 1 month trial period:) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Havard Posted April 15, 2007 Share Posted April 15, 2007 Two questions........ Where has the thread gone? What is the problem with this bloke? Has he caused loads of aggro before then!! H. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamesmark Posted April 15, 2007 Share Posted April 15, 2007 Strange the thread has gone, i was only reading it 20min ago:search: there was nothing bad in it and the mods had agreed to let him back on a 1 month trial period:) Should start a thread to see who is going to be the first to wind him up and also how long it takes, and then how long it is till he gets banned again for fighting his corner (although he fought his corner in a silly way) and the people that wound him up again get once again let off. It is good he is getting let back imho for what it is worth,good on the mods for giving him a chance. The simple option is if people do not want him back there is an ignore option that they can use. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamesmark Posted April 15, 2007 Share Posted April 15, 2007 Two questions........ Where has the thread gone? What is the problem with this bloke? Has he caused loads of aggro before then!! H. He had a mouth like a toilet basicly, he did not know when to swear and when not to swear, also people wound him up as he was an easy target as he retaliated and he got banned. I think thats the story anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamieP Posted April 15, 2007 Share Posted April 15, 2007 Homer said in the other thread if them same people wind him up they will be banned without warning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamesmark Posted April 15, 2007 Share Posted April 15, 2007 Homer said in the other thread if them same people wind him up they will be banned without warning. Another good step forward then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael Posted April 15, 2007 Share Posted April 15, 2007 So there was a thread about him coming back on then? But it's been hidden so nobody can see it? Would have been better to have a "member renewal" like we do for traders IMO, seems he has some high profile supporters though so I guess that's what counts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wkdtime Posted April 15, 2007 Share Posted April 15, 2007 Would have been better to have a "member renewal" like we do for traders IMO, seems he has some high profile supporters though so I guess that's what counts. Forum under siege...OTT me think's! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedM Posted April 15, 2007 Share Posted April 15, 2007 I heard rumours that someone in that thread threatened to rip some people faces off if they wound him up. Might have been that but like I say, rumours is all I heard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamieP Posted April 15, 2007 Share Posted April 15, 2007 I heard rumours that someone in that thread threatened to rip some people faces off if they wound him up. Might have been that but like I say, rumours is all I heard. Dont try and take that out of context Martin, you know that was in jest and it had a big smiley grin:) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedM Posted April 15, 2007 Share Posted April 15, 2007 I didn't read it to be able to take it out of context, Jamie. I heard about it at a meet and it was pretty much repeated as I heard it. I think the forum should try and have a Summer of Love. No more fights, bannings, tiffs etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamesmark Posted April 15, 2007 Share Posted April 15, 2007 There was a vote on it, attached ot thread in question and last time I looked it was about 86% as a yes vote to allow him back so under current forum renewal rules he would have been allowed back, however the thread did not last long lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael Posted April 15, 2007 Share Posted April 15, 2007 There was a vote on it, attached ot thread in question and last time I looked it was about 86% as a yes vote to allow him back Ah that's fine then I guess, as long as a minority had a chance to discuss it all is well, like I said earlier the forum is bound to benefit from him being here again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamieP Posted April 15, 2007 Share Posted April 15, 2007 I didn't read it to be able to take it out of context, Jamie. I heard about it at a meet and it was pretty much repeated as I heard it. I think the forum should try and have a Summer of Love. No more fights, bannings, tiffs etc. I just heard on the grape vine (AKA msn) why that thread was deleted and it was nothing to do with the coment you was talking about. and i agree i like the new Redm:D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedM Posted April 15, 2007 Share Posted April 15, 2007 i agree i like the new Redm:D Me too. I just wish the fat c**t would lose some weight.:D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamieP Posted April 15, 2007 Share Posted April 15, 2007 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Posted April 15, 2007 Share Posted April 15, 2007 There was a vote on it, attached ot thread in question and last time I looked it was about 86% as a yes vote to allow him back so under current forum renewal rules he would have been allowed back, however the thread did not last long lol.The poll was started at about 11pm and he'd been reinstated by 00.30 I don't suppose the vast majority of members had even seen the thread and poll. The Poll had a grand total of 27 votes last time I saw it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobbeh Posted April 15, 2007 Share Posted April 15, 2007 Whats this thread got to do with Supras, move to OT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamesmark Posted April 15, 2007 Share Posted April 15, 2007 The poll was started at about 11pm and he'd been reinstated by 00.30 I don't suppose the vast majority of members had even seen the thread and poll. The Poll had a grand total of 27 votes last time I saw it. This is why I clearly said that the thread did not last long. So that people with half a brain cell would know why they had not seen it or had a chance to cast a vote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Branners Posted April 15, 2007 Share Posted April 15, 2007 moving to OT. decision has been made, no point moaning about it folks. The thread has been moved out the way for further reference. For those that are moaning about this, do remember that one day it could be you in the same situation, some of you more than others. JB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now