dibbleyuk Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 This local car forum http://www.carcruzin.co.uk/forum/index.php Has an X rated section a few of the girls in this section are 16, 17 yrs old whats the law on this there are some topless pics naked but covered there bits pics the guy who post these is in his 30's i cant say if he takes them but it certain says he does just wondering the law on this and posting them on the internet i know some of the girls personal and thinks is downgrading and sluty as its not professional just seems to me some perv taken pics of them.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ark Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 16 is legal for topless IIRC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustGav Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 16 is legal for topless IIRC. You are kidding me?? There is just something slightly wrong with a 16yr old going topless for photos. Or am I just being over sensitive because I'm a parent... BTW : Not even going to look at the website. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edd_t Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 im sure 16 is too young! thinking about magazines like Nuts and stuff (low grade p0rn, but good for TV ) and im sure all their girls are over 18. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlanM Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 Yea, sure that must be wrong, although I would be just as shocked if my 23 year old went topless in photos as I would if my 16 year old did Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustGav Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 Yea, sure that must be wrong, although I would be just as shocked if my 23 year old went topless in photos as I would if my 16 year old did Yeah, I'd be annoyed and shocked, and then I would be done for child abuse for beating her round the block once or twice... I will go on record saying, I'm not into porn or page 3 style stuff, but that is my own view on things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dibbleyuk Posted March 6, 2007 Author Share Posted March 6, 2007 I was always under the impression that it was 18 i personal dont know but it makes me laugh the section on the website says over 18's only but the girls in there are under 18 how does that work!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlanM Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 Yeah, I'd be annoyed and shocked, and then I would be done for child abuse for beating her round the block once or twice... Think it would be a race between me and their two brothers mate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Animal Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 I think you can take topless shots at 16, but need the parents' consent until 18 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ark Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 You are kidding me?? There is just something slightly wrong with a 16yr old going topless for photos. Or am I just being over sensitive because I'm a parent... BTW : Not even going to look at the website. It's old enough for marriage, motorcycling, smoking, sex...why not page 3? Note that it's not old enough for full nude modelling. I think most people have the same reservations that you do, including me, which is probably why you'll not see 16 year old in the Sun, even though it is legal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndrewOW Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 I think that Samantha Fox famously was still 16 when she started topless shots back in the 80's, so I can't imagine its changed much. I prefered Linda Lusardi back then anyway (ahem) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monkey76364 Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 The thing is how would it stand when they let him take them or some one take them and they are over the age of concent! You can have sex at 16, and what about girls or blokes that send MMS pics on their phones to each other of naughty pics, Im sur you can do that and not get in trouble and that would be hard to watch??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stupra Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 I must admit i'm a man of double standards when it comes to page 3 an similar things, the 18 year old's in the pics are usually stunning, and make's me wish I was young again, but if my 18 year old daughter did it, i'd not be a happy bunny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Nicholas Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 I agree it is degrading, slutty and pervy but if the girls get their kit off and pose for the guy what can you do? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hiten55 Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 regardless of whether its legal or not, there is DEFINATELY something wrong with people wanting to see pics of topless 16 year olds. and we wonder why society has so many paedo's in it lately. we also wonder why youg girls are getting tartier and tartier. it seems to stem from a lack of parental discipline, not that the parents havent tried, on the whole that is. but its a barrel affect, one or two start getting them out and everyone wants to do it. and its getting worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seb Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 Gah, can't see the pics without joining... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 Yup, topless is legal at 16, full flange shots not til 18. Linsey Dawn McKenzie got them out for the Daily Sport on her 16th birthday. Classy lass, that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 Sam Fox was topless in The Sun at 16 so it must be legal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tbourner Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 regardless of whether its legal or not, there is DEFINATELY something wrong with people wanting to see pics of topless 16 year olds. err, why? I fancy 16 year olds. What is 'wrong' with me? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Branners Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 They changed the rules since Sam fox. ClassOne will be along shortly to clarify but I believe all glamour shots have to be of somebody over 18 now. JB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ark Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 Yup, topless is legal at 16, full flange shots not til 18. Linsey Dawn McKenzie got them out for the Daily Sport on her 16th birthday. Classy lass, that. Yeah that's where I got my (mis)information too... To be honest, I don't get the fascination with teenagers - girls are usually scrawny and unattractive until they fill out a little in their twenties. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monkey76364 Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 Looking at having to sign up its for 13 years olds and up so I would asume that its bassed on younger people being signed up on the site...so 16 years olds looking at 16 years olds.... but in the real world I doubt it !!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tbourner Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 AFAIK all forums have the 13+ sign up thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monkey76364 Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 you learn some thing every day... why 13??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Class One Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 IIRC making/distributing indecent photographs/pictures and psuedo pictures of a child under 18 is an offence under Sec 1 Protection of Children Act 1978. Possessing them is an offence under Sec160 Criminal Justice Act. But it's a case of defining "indecent". There are defences, one of them being if you married to the subject and they are for personal use. I haven't seen the pics in question so couldn't comment on them. As the law defines a child as someone under 18, topless pics of a girl aged 16 or 17 would fall under the act. (this came into effect under the Sexual Offences Act 2003 definitaion of a child and the Childrens & Young Persons Act). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now