sdavies Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 Well... made me chuckle at least Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobbeh Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 Dont mention Jesus' tomb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamesmark Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 Dont mention Jesus' tomb What that he should have stayed there? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim_supra Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 Brilliant! That has now been printed off and stuck on the office wall! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gamer Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 ................ http://homepages.nildram.co.uk/~shemesh/biblewarninglabelsi4.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
juanchan Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 Lol! I like both of those pics! I'm sure some people won't though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kittyclaws Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 Lol! I like both of those pics! I'm sure some people won't though you are right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tbourner Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 Religion, also see 'can't take a joke'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sdavies Posted February 28, 2007 Author Share Posted February 28, 2007 Anybody with an ounce of sense wouldn't take offense at this stuff. If they were confident and secure in their faith and views they would discard it as internet tat anyway. Not like this stuff "Un-converts" people, and it is far from obscene Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pot Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 So so so very true... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 http://img176.imageshack.us/img176/1442/churchtf3.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrHanky Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 LOL, I like those pics. If anyone from the deep south in the US saw those then there would be comments like "you are going to burn in hell" flying about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamesmark Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 [qimg]http://img176.imageshack.us/img176/1442/churchtf3.jpg[/qimg] How very very true that caption is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt H Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 that first science thing is so wrong! sceince is all about trying to disprove things, so there is no doubt that the theory is true. If youget what i mean, the first block is almost religios too! anyone like the religious side can prove anything if they want. It should read something like: Try every eventuality to disprove you theory... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sdavies Posted February 28, 2007 Author Share Posted February 28, 2007 that first science thing is so wrong! sceince is all about trying to disprove things, so there is no doubt that the theory is true. If youget what i mean, the first block is almost religios too! anyone like the religious side can prove anything if they want. It should read something like: Try every eventuality to disprove you theory... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method p.s. which branch of science do you study mate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tbourner Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 Not this again!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sdavies Posted February 28, 2007 Author Share Posted February 28, 2007 Not this again!! Ooer, which bit of that thread is pertinent? Do I have to read it all Seems I missed it first time around Blimeys 40% that participated claim to be atheist Figures ANyhoo - was never meant to be serious, just tongue in cheek views that people have that make me chuckle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tbourner Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 It was a long one that turned into a faith vs science argument pretty much - interesting read though if you get a min!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt H Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method p.s. which branch of science do you study mate? the correct version! a theory can only gain merit if it cant be disproved, thats what experiments are all about! take maths for example and equations. Just because a equation wrks for one number, it doesnt mean it wll work for all! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sdavies Posted February 28, 2007 Author Share Posted February 28, 2007 the correct version! a theory can only gain merit if it cant be disproved, thats what experiments are all about! take maths for example and equations. Just because a equation wrks for one number, it doesnt mean it wll work for all! Personally I thought a theory gained merit with experimental proof and reproducibility. The point I think you are trying to make is that the theory has to suitably suggest an outcome/observation from a reproducible experiment. This experiment has to be open to the rest of the scientific community for objective analysis and reproduction. Until anybody comes up with something that disproves/shows holes in the theory for whatever reason, the theory remains in tact. I think the flow chart actually does take that into account (if not a little crudely). The difference being, truly objective scientists are willing to accept that something is wrong if a theory can be disproved, and strive to gain a further understanding where their model of the world has broken down and move towards better understanding of the subject matter (as opposed to religious dogma I meant to say - bloody internet baulked). /shrug Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DamanC Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 Im sorry but science is not about disproving theory. It primary goal is to Prove Theory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tbourner Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 Whether or not it proves a theory by proving it, or not disproving it, the fact is it is based on deciding whether or not a theory is correct and then moving on based on the answer. Religion is set in stone and unable to adapt should some proof come along. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DamanC Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 As for religion.......... http://www.best-horror-movies.com/images/land-of-the-dead-zombie-cropped.jpg World would be a better place without it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R Black Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 Did you know the most stolen book IS the bible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilli Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 hehe nice flow chart just finishing off reading The God Delusion, interesting read and it raises so many valid points, well worth a read Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now