Guigsy Posted February 24, 2007 Share Posted February 24, 2007 i dont even know why i want to win these Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moistfinger Posted February 24, 2007 Share Posted February 24, 2007 Is Windows a Virus No, Windows is not a virus. Here's what viruses do: 1.They replicate quickly - okay, Windows does that. 2.Viruses use up valuable system resources, slowing down the system as they do so - okay, Windows does that. 3.Viruses will, from time to time, trash your hard disk - okay, Windows does that too. 4.Viruses are usually carried, unknown to the user, along with valuable programs and systems. - Sigh.. Windows does that, too. 5.Viruses will occasionally make the user suspect their system is too slow (see 2) and the user will buy new hardware. - Yup, Windows does that, too. Until now it seems Windows is a virus but there are fundamental differences: Viruses are well supported by their authors, are running on most systems, their program code is fast, compact and efficient and they tend to become more sophisticated as they mature. So Windows is not a virus. It's a bug. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul ashton Posted February 24, 2007 Share Posted February 24, 2007 suck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marty Posted February 24, 2007 Share Posted February 24, 2007 WHY DO WOMEN RUB THEIR EYES WHEN THEY GET UP IN THE MORNING? Because they don’t have balls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr lover Posted February 24, 2007 Share Posted February 24, 2007 got 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucas Posted February 24, 2007 Share Posted February 24, 2007 ok what to say Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bondango Posted February 24, 2007 Share Posted February 24, 2007 Space For Rent One evening, after attending the theater, two gentlemen were walking down the avenue when they observed a rather well dressed and attractive young lady walking ahead of them. One of them turned to the other and remarked, "I'd give $250.00 to spend the night with that woman." Much to their surprise, the young lady overheard the remark, turned around, and replied, "I'll take you up on that offer." She had a neat appearance and a pleasant voice, so after bidding his companion good night, the man accompanied the young lady to her apartment. The following morning the man presented her with $125.00 as he prepared to leave. She demanded the rest of the money, stating "If you don't give me the other $125.00, I'll sue you for it." He laughed, saying, "I'd like to see you get it on these grounds." Within a few days, he was surprised when he received a summons ordering his presence in court as a defendant in a lawsuit. He hurried to his lawyer and explained the details of the case. His lawyer said, "She can't possibly get a judgment against you on such grounds, but it will be interesting to see how her case will be presented." After the usual preliminaries, the lady's lawyer addressed the court as follows: "Your honor, my client, this lady, is the owner of a piece of property, a garden spot, surrounded by a profuse growth of shrubbery, which property she agreed to rent to the defendant for a specified length of time for the sum of $250.00. The defendant took possession of the property, used it extensively for the purposes for which it was rented, but upon evacuating the premises, he paid only $125.00, one-half of the amount agreed upon. The rent was not excessive, since it is restricted property, and we ask judgment be granted against the defendant to assure payment of the balance." The defendant's lawyer was impressed and amused by the way his opponent had presented the case. His defense therefore was somewhat different from the way he originally planned to present it. "Your honor," he said, "my client agrees that the lady has a fine piece of property, which he did rent such property for a time, and a degree of pleasure was derived from the transaction. However, my client found a well on the property around which he placed his own stones, sunk a shaft, and erected a pump, all labor performed personally by him. We claim these improvements to the property were sufficient to offset the unpaid amount, and that the plaintiff was adequately compensated for the rental of said property. We, therefore, ask that judgment not be granted." The young lady's lawyer answered, "Your honor, my client agrees that the defendant did find a well on her property. However, had the defendant not known that the well existed; he would never have rented the property. Also, upon evacuating the premises, the defendant removed the stones, pulled out the shaft, and took the pump with him. In doing so, he not only dragged the equipment through the shrubbery, but left the hole much larger than it was prior to his occupancy, making the property much less desirable to others. We, therefore, ask that judgment be granted." In the Judge's decision, he provided for two options: "Pay the $125.00 or have the equipment detached from its current location and provide it to the plaintiff for damages." The defendant immediately wrote a check. sorry, no time to read...must make stupid post.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobSheffield Posted February 24, 2007 Share Posted February 24, 2007 i dont even know why i want to win these Ditto Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gamer Posted February 24, 2007 Share Posted February 24, 2007 987654321 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlotte Posted February 24, 2007 Share Posted February 24, 2007 Penis for the win The odds are stacked against the vagina to be fair. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
juanchan Posted February 24, 2007 Share Posted February 24, 2007 I just watched 'The Good Shepherd' My god that was hard work... 3 hours long!!!! The Next Karate Kid for me. Not the same with Hilary Swank instead of Daniel-san Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr lover Posted February 24, 2007 Share Posted February 24, 2007 horse Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marty Posted February 24, 2007 Share Posted February 24, 2007 WHY DO WOMEN WEAR MAKE UP & PERFUME? Because they’re ugly and they smell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucas Posted February 24, 2007 Share Posted February 24, 2007 nice counting there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul ashton Posted February 24, 2007 Share Posted February 24, 2007 54321 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlanM Posted February 24, 2007 Share Posted February 24, 2007 1285 wins Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rik Posted February 24, 2007 Share Posted February 24, 2007 Are we there yet....Are we there yet....Are we there yet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guigsy Posted February 24, 2007 Share Posted February 24, 2007 mmmm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
markymark Posted February 24, 2007 Share Posted February 24, 2007 erm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edd_t Posted February 24, 2007 Share Posted February 24, 2007 i dont even know why i want to win these win what? i thought this was general friday night banter! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bondango Posted February 24, 2007 Share Posted February 24, 2007 The odds are stacked against the vagina to be fair. whoever owns them odds is a lucky man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr lover Posted February 24, 2007 Share Posted February 24, 2007 jockey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamesmark Posted February 24, 2007 Share Posted February 24, 2007 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R3DG3CKO ROB Posted February 24, 2007 Share Posted February 24, 2007 Al Murray Rocks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael Posted February 24, 2007 Share Posted February 24, 2007 The European PS3 will play fewer older games than the Japanese and American consoles, Sony says. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts