Ewen Posted December 2, 2006 Share Posted December 2, 2006 nope, it has nothing to do with appearance. Hes an Alien....not from this ere earth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisSZ Posted December 2, 2006 Share Posted December 2, 2006 Ah! He is 'normal' in his alter-ego (Clark Kent) - all the others are 'super' in their alter-egos Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Konrad Posted December 2, 2006 Share Posted December 2, 2006 Ah! He is 'normal' in his alter-ego (Clark Kent) - all the others are 'super' in their alter-egos No, he still keep and use his powers - like Spiderman for example Maybe he is only one with Super already in name Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gamer Posted December 2, 2006 Share Posted December 2, 2006 He only has one testicle Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorin Posted December 2, 2006 Share Posted December 2, 2006 Hes an Alien....not from this ere earth Racist. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoboblio Posted December 2, 2006 Share Posted December 2, 2006 Q. What makes Superman different from all the other Super hero's? Did you watch Kill Bill vol 2 recently per chance? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt H Posted December 2, 2006 Share Posted December 2, 2006 his way of life, sacrifice, morals, his powers, what he stands for and the lessons that he teachs, there all far ahead of any other super hero, plus hes not just some human that got changed, hes an alien, hes from another planet, so possibly more believable (in his early 1940+) days. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt H Posted December 2, 2006 Share Posted December 2, 2006 Did you watch Kill Bill vol 2 recently per chance? yeah u just jogged my memory!! go watch the ending of that film when Bill and Kiddo finally meet! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tbourner Posted December 2, 2006 Share Posted December 2, 2006 Ah! He is 'normal' in his alter-ego (Clark Kent) - all the others are 'super' in their alter-egos That's what I thought, from 'Unbreakable' isn't it? He's the only one who is naturally Superman, and he wears a suit to make him look normal - he was even wrapped in his Superman suit when he crashed here!! All the others put on a suit to 'become' the hero!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wkdtime Posted December 2, 2006 Share Posted December 2, 2006 Ah! He is 'normal' in his alter-ego (Clark Kent) - all the others are 'super' in their alter-egos Thats the one:D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wkdtime Posted December 2, 2006 Share Posted December 2, 2006 Did you watch Kill Bill vol 2 recently per chance? a while ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tbourner Posted December 2, 2006 Share Posted December 2, 2006 I've read this hole thread, an some things I agree with, and some I don't. All i'll say is that I believe in the saying "when in Rome, do as the Romans". Many people who come to this country choose to fit in as best they can, but there are other's who want to live by their own rules, an not try to fit in at all. These people, regardless of nationality, religion or colour, are the one's who cause problems. I agree with the Aussie policy when it was said that "its not the country that has to adapt to your way of life (the immigrants), its you that has to adapt to our way of life, we have our culture, our laws, and our religion, if you don't want to fit in, don't come here, if you don't like it when your here, then leave. Well that's basically what I've been trying to say (why weren't you here yesterday!!! ). Then people still pick at it and say "What about the people who are already here and don't live by our rules? Should they be kicked out?" and other stupid things like "What are the rules you want them to live by?"!!! I just want Muslims to take off their head gear when I tell them to. I could claim that I'm a man of science, science tells me it's bloody cold outside, so I'm wearing a balaclava as part of my Atheist religion - I bet you a million pounds I'd get asked to remove it by someone on the first day!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sdavies Posted December 2, 2006 Share Posted December 2, 2006 I could claim that I'm a man of science, science tells me it's bloody cold outside, so I'm wearing a balaclava as part of my Atheist religion - I bet you a million pounds I'd get asked to remove it by someone on the first day!!! If you walked into a bank or building society, damned straight they will ask you politely to remove any facial coverings - it kinda makes them twitchy Security reasons... has been that way since I remember. Also, airport security tend to have issues with covering your face when a visual identity has to be established against a passport photo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Posted December 2, 2006 Share Posted December 2, 2006 You didn't miss much tbh. RB was wittering on for ages about what a huge fan he is of SM and how nervous he was to meet him. M came on, sang a song I've never heard before, it was alright. Then RB gushed a bit more and SM looked uncomfortable, they hugged awkwardly then SM fooked off. Cheers Jake. That's exactly how I thought it might go... he's good, but a total weirdo... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tbourner Posted December 2, 2006 Share Posted December 2, 2006 If you walked into a bank or building society, damned straight they will ask you politely to remove any facial coverings - it kinda makes them twitchy Security reasons... Yet it's considered racist to ask a Muslim woman to remove theirs? How about getting my kids to wear a balaclava at school? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sdavies Posted December 2, 2006 Share Posted December 2, 2006 Yet it's considered racist to ask a Muslim woman to remove theirs? How about getting my kids to wear a balaclava at school? I have no idea where schools stand on things such as balaclavas but I always remember a school uniform code in my school - which they are always fussy about. Also beign a specific Christian church school - items of cultural/religious signifigance didn't factor in to daily life (apart from the odd St. Christopher chain and possibly crucifix chain around peoples necks that you never actually saw), as there are no obvious outstanding specific icons/items of clothing that pertain to the religion that people are expected to wear for the Christian religion. I remember the school uniform policy had to adjust slightly when the school started to admit children from cultures other than Christian backgrounds (I don't want to start any debate about that - it caused chaos back in the day when I was of school age considering how much a PITA it was to actually get into my school as you had to be Christened and Confirmed when I was entering the school system - but change is CHANGE, and we change or we eventually become extinct - human race rocks for its ability to adapt - isn't this adaptation?). If you had a legitimate religious reason for sending your kids to school with balaclavas mate - I for one would not utter a word against you or your beliefs to do so :D (I might think it a tad weird - and feel sorry for the abuse your kids may receive, but thats by the by). Is it actually racist to ask a Muslim woman to remove her head gear for identity purposes? It is reminiscent of being a motorcyclists hopping off his bike and wandering intot he bank (forgetting he has his helmet on) being asked nicely to remove it? Does anybody know anything about these interactions - I have NEVER seen a woman in full head gear IN a bank (although I have to admit I don't spend my life in said establishments) - although my other half used to work in one for many years and has no recall of having to ask anyone this question (other than the odd forgetful motorcyclist). Erm, wish I knew the answers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Konrad Posted December 3, 2006 Share Posted December 3, 2006 Is there any word in english dictionary which would describe antagonism to religion? Term rasism or rasist should be used in colour skin context I belive, not religion. Mind you, I do not have nothing against skin colour, but i'm really against any kind of religion fanatism or even "showing off". I belive this do not make me rasist in any way. @sdavies I belive Koran allows women to uncover face and hands, so this crap about burkhas is just some idiotic man idea. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sdavies Posted December 3, 2006 Share Posted December 3, 2006 Is there any word in english dictionary which would describe antagonism to religion? Term rasism or rasist should be used in colour skin context I belive, not religion. Mind you, I do not have nothing against skin colour, but i'm really against any kind of religion fanatism or even "showing off". I belive this do not make me rasist in any way. @sdavies I belive Koran allows women to uncover face and hands, so this crap about burkhas is just some idiotic man idea. That is a bloody good question - I am not sure off the top of my head if there is a specific - religion'ist type of term -the closest we tend to come in normal usage of descriptive terms is sectarianism: See: Sectarianism Quoting: Sectarianism refers (usually pejoratively) to a rigid adherence to a particular sect or party or denomination. It often implies discrimination, denunciation, or violence against those outside the sect. And yes - I believe the whole covering of the woman idea is man based (then again all of the "holy" books are written by men, but that is something for a WHOLE different theological debate), not religion based - I read it somewhere and saw some woman giving some chap a bloody good hiding over it on the net somewhere - if I can find it I will link it. Racism is a nasty term that *is* being used way too much in a slightly wrong way. Islam is the main target here that tends to be discussed, and afaik it isn't just a religion but a way of life that people adhere to (just like being a Buddhist etc - not quite a religion just a way of thinking - Islamic ideas I do not agree with but *TOLERATE* - as any human being should) - hence they do not exclude other cultures from joiniing Islam - in fact I believe Islamic folk EMBRACE anyone into their culture. Not saying it is the right way to go, and I obviously am not Islamic/Muslim - a tad on the "atheist so prove it I am a scientist" - bench. I wish people could just get along. I dislike weird rules that make no logical sense - and would never go along with them willingly. I accept peoples rights to follow said weird rules though, as long as they do not hurt me, my friends, and people around me - and anybody that doesn't believe in those rules. Play nice people, is it too much to ask? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imi Posted December 3, 2006 Author Share Posted December 3, 2006 Racism is a nasty term that *is* being used way too much in a slightly wrong way. Islam is the main target here that tends to be discussed, and afaik it isn't just a religion but a way of life that people adhere to (just like being a Buddhist etc - not quite a religion just a way of thinking - Islamic ideas I do not agree with but *TOLERATE* - as any human being should) - hence they do not exclude other cultures from joiniing Islam - in fact I believe Islamic folk EMBRACE anyone into their culture. AGREE - 100% Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
penguin Posted December 3, 2006 Share Posted December 3, 2006 i've been off the forums a day and all the usual suspects dig in... i'll deal with u all 2mro Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt H Posted December 3, 2006 Share Posted December 3, 2006 - I have NEVER seen a woman in full head gear IN a bank (although I have to admit I don't spend my life in said establishments) - although my other half used to work in one for many years and has no recall of having to ask anyone this question (other than the odd forgetful motorcyclist). Erm, wish I knew the answers. U have never been to Prston then! i was in Natwest on Wednesday and there were 4 women in there with full gear on. three together and one with her husband who looked normal as anything incidently! the one with her husband was at the Customer service bit, the banker had to learn straight in to hear what she was saying, it looked really awkward for the female banker, she couldnt really hear her and couldnt seen even her eyes. 80% of language is transmitted through body langauge, most of it through facial expressions......................... words are only like 10%. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJ Posted December 3, 2006 Share Posted December 3, 2006 80% of language is transmitted through body langauge, most of it through facial expressions......................... words are only like 10%. Are you sure about that? Where did that get published? Seems like the telephone system manages very well if that is the case. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fifty Posted December 3, 2006 Share Posted December 3, 2006 I have video phone lol Its not the method its the content of the message that bothers me. Rich:rolleyes: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisSZ Posted December 3, 2006 Share Posted December 3, 2006 Matt H is partially correct. Most research into communication claim that the actual words spoken account for around 10% of the actual message, the rest is indeed conveyed via body language, facial expressions and also vocal tone, emphasis, intonation etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisSZ Posted December 3, 2006 Share Posted December 3, 2006 Are you sure about that? Where did that get published? Seems like the telephone system manages very well if that is the case. Argyle (1988) and Merhabain (1968) are two of the more popular theorists on communication:) BTW - still got your zorst sat here safe and sound:) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.