imi Posted November 11, 2006 Share Posted November 11, 2006 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WffzEL4uwRE http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6EITCIgia5c How do such idiots get into such powerful positions???? How can we public be so stupid to vote them in for the 2nd time....? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dangerous brain Posted November 11, 2006 Share Posted November 11, 2006 Not his biggest fan then Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkTheBoy Posted November 11, 2006 Share Posted November 11, 2006 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WffzEL4uwRE http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6EITCIgia5c How do such idiots get into such powerful positions???? How can we public be so stupid to vote them in for the 2nd time....? Fortunately we don't get to vote them in... ... We have our own flock of wallys to choose from. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darren-K Posted November 11, 2006 Share Posted November 11, 2006 its a shame to see Rumsfield go, he had a lot of get up & go about him rather than just sitting back and remaining passive., we in the west should of gone into Iraq a long time ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imi Posted November 11, 2006 Author Share Posted November 11, 2006 its a shame to see Rumsfield go, he had a lot of get up & go about him rather than just sitting back and remaining passive., we in the west should of gone into Iraq a long time ago. love the sarcasm, PMSL. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dangerous brain Posted November 11, 2006 Share Posted November 11, 2006 Oh comeon bite man We haven't had a 50 page racially inspired rantathon for at least a week Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darren-K Posted November 11, 2006 Share Posted November 11, 2006 seriously tho, Rumsfield to me seemed like a nice fellow, i realy did like him,.he was honest,sincere and accurate. you cant blame the bloke for failing to remember every single word he ever spoke . and lets face it,. he did a good job whilst in office. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dangerous brain Posted November 11, 2006 Share Posted November 11, 2006 As a politician thats his sodding job mate. If not his its his teams job to ensure that he doesn't drop a bollock like he frequently did. Give British politicians their dues most are significantly more aware of their past ramblings Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darren-K Posted November 11, 2006 Share Posted November 11, 2006 i think saddam dismantled the WMD and buried them months before the west got there about Rumsfield tho he is quite old now,. so forgetfullness is kind of to be expected. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imi Posted November 11, 2006 Author Share Posted November 11, 2006 seriously tho, Rumsfield to me seemed like a nice fellow, i realy did like him,.he was honest,sincere and accurate. you cant blame the bloke for failing to remember every single word he ever spoke . and lets face it,. he did a good job whilst in office. Go on....thats brilliant.....one more and you might come out with a classic....go on... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imi Posted November 11, 2006 Author Share Posted November 11, 2006 i think saddam dismantled the WMD and buried them months before the west got there Most likely explanation Saddam probably shoved them up his arse and up Rumsfeld arse when he went over to visit him a number of times. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustGav Posted November 11, 2006 Share Posted November 11, 2006 WMD my arse, it was all about the oil..... nothing more... I don't like Bush personally, but nobody will really care about that, but then I don't like politicians in general. They are glorified advertising men selling the public something that want to hear. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darren-K Posted November 11, 2006 Share Posted November 11, 2006 Go on....thats brilliant.....one more and you might come out with a classic....go on... what ? Saddam was a bad man! Rumsfield good man ! the facts are there dude all you have to do is look at the fact saddam is due to swing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darren-K Posted November 11, 2006 Share Posted November 11, 2006 WMD my arse, it was all about the oil..... nothing more... I don't like Bush personally, but nobody will really care about that, but then I don't like politicians in general. They are glorified advertising men selling the public something that want to hear. cmon man, the people saddam gassed where killed were they stood.,. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustGav Posted November 11, 2006 Share Posted November 11, 2006 Okay, so you are saying Iraq was invaded in order to bring people to wonderful idea of democracy? Of course it is... So why haven't they done it in other places like Zimbabwe (Robert Mogabe), North Korea (Kim Jung-Li [i think])... of course... not because NK did a test firing of a WMD, but because there is nothing of interest in those places for the 'Allied' Forces to control. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darren-K Posted November 11, 2006 Share Posted November 11, 2006 Okay, so you are saying Iraq was invaded in order to bring people to wonderful idea of democracy? Of course it is... So why haven't they done it in other places like Zimbabwe (Robert Mogabe), North Korea (Kim Jung-Li [i think])... of course... not because NK did a test firing of a WMD, but because there is nothing of interest in those places for the 'Allied' Forces to control. well thats where we have to disagree on man, i belive it has nothing whatsoever to do with oil, do you know how much oil reserve is in texas ? a lot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dangerous brain Posted November 11, 2006 Share Posted November 11, 2006 Sorry man I am with phoenix on this one Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrAngry Posted November 11, 2006 Share Posted November 11, 2006 Okay, so you are saying Iraq was invaded in order to bring people to wonderful idea of democracy? Of course it is... So why haven't they done it in other places like Zimbabwe (Robert Mogabe), North Korea (Kim Jung-Li [i think])... of course... not because NK did a test firing of a WMD, but because there is nothing of interest in those places for the 'Allied' Forces to control. Interesting It looks as though there is something of interest in North Korea. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustGav Posted November 11, 2006 Share Posted November 11, 2006 well thats where we have to disagree on man, i belive it has nothing whatsoever to do with oil, do you know how much oil reserve is in texas ? a lot. Good debate this actually.... If it only has to do with WMDs, then why haven't other places been liberated to democracy? Places like the ones I mentioned; Zimbabwe and North Korea. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darren-K Posted November 11, 2006 Share Posted November 11, 2006 well i respect everyones belief Brain, its just my opinion that its not about oil,. by the time were done in iraq and afgani it would of cost more than the value of the oil reserves in the east,. after oil what did the us gvmnt say recently ,. ? it was costing them 1 billion $ a week to fund the conflict ? it was something like that amount. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imi Posted November 11, 2006 Author Share Posted November 11, 2006 Good debate this actually.... If it only has to do with WMDs, then why haven't other places been liberated to democracy? Places like the ones I mentioned; Zimbabwe and North Korea. Pheonix - agree with you buddy, but please refrain from using the words LIBERATING and DEMOCRACY in the same sentence, I'm about to PMSL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustGav Posted November 11, 2006 Share Posted November 11, 2006 Interesting It looks as though there is something of interest in North Korea. That is actually a very interest read... guess this puts them on the democracy map then, especially with the nuclear bomb test. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darren-K Posted November 11, 2006 Share Posted November 11, 2006 Good debate this actually.... If it only has to do with WMDs, then why haven't other places been liberated to democracy? Places like the ones I mentioned; Zimbabwe and North Korea. because the us gvmnt categorises the risk factor,. iraq had a higher risk factor., currently were at cold war stasus with n korea. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imi Posted November 11, 2006 Author Share Posted November 11, 2006 it was costing them 1 billion $ a week to fund the conflict ? it was something like that amount. someones talking out of their ARSE.....now that rumsfeld has gone...who could it be. ANOTHER ARSEHOLE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darren-K Posted November 11, 2006 Share Posted November 11, 2006 someones talking out of their ARSE.....now that rumsfeld has gone...who could it be. ANOTHER ARSEHOLE they said it last nite on the news.... but you prob dont like western news as it prob makes you so angry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.