Ark Posted April 5, 2007 Share Posted April 5, 2007 I wonder - would there be any benefit in upgrading a Jap setup with a UK master cylinder assembly. Does anyone know if these are different? I could have sworn the UK MC was bigger/better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdDaMan Posted April 22, 2007 Share Posted April 22, 2007 any update on these then Jamie? did you get the rears? or did i ressurect this for nothing? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamieP Posted April 23, 2007 Share Posted April 23, 2007 Still waiting on them to turn up:( Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jurgen-Jm-Imports Posted April 23, 2007 Share Posted April 23, 2007 i have some on my rx7 and the brakes are just as good as brembos or alcons i have used on the past Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lebsteif Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 Ok i'm going for the D2 racing brakes Is it worth the money to go for the 365mm instead of the 330mm ? Anyone? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kranz Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 I wonder - would there be any benefit in upgrading a Jap setup with a UK master cylinder assembly. Does anyone know if these are different? I could have sworn the UK MC was bigger/better. Very slightly bigger bore IIRC, but not enough to make any noticeable difference I believe. I won't bother when fitting my Uk brakes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ark Posted April 30, 2007 Share Posted April 30, 2007 Very slightly bigger bore IIRC, but not enough to make any noticeable difference I believe. I won't bother when fitting my Uk brakes. I'm not looking for a noticeable improvement, just AN improvement. Track use is killing my UK brakes, and I reckon a full rejuvenation might be necessary, perhaps in conjunction with a 355mm big brake conversion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lebsteif Posted June 2, 2007 Share Posted June 2, 2007 a 12 pot version with 380mm discs are now available as well :o Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lebsteif Posted June 2, 2007 Share Posted June 2, 2007 http://tuning.jcauto.pl/image/Z2Z4L2pjYXV0b3R1bm5pbmcvcGwvZGVmYXVsdF9vcGlzeS52MC8xOTAvMS8x/1396522682.jpg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lockys96 Posted June 2, 2007 Share Posted June 2, 2007 wtf. i want 20 pot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul mac Posted June 2, 2007 Share Posted June 2, 2007 i did seriously look at the D2 brakes but after some research decided to stick with tried and tested Brembos, these bad boys are going on the front Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lockys96 Posted June 2, 2007 Share Posted June 2, 2007 euro-pimping ure car eh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lockys96 Posted June 2, 2007 Share Posted June 2, 2007 im going to get some of the k-sport 8pots with the better pads Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul mac Posted June 2, 2007 Share Posted June 2, 2007 euro-pimping ure car eh lol no i wont be driving round with mercedes-benz on them Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GazzaGSi Posted July 5, 2007 Share Posted July 5, 2007 Any updates from anyone on the brakes? Anyone had the full kit (front and rear) fitted? Is it wise to do the brakes all round rather than just the front? In need of a brake upgrade so keeping my options open at the minute, anyones experience with a particular kit would be nice to hear. My budget will be between £1k to £1.5k approx. I dont know what I want though, 6 or 8 pot, size of disc, front and rear etc Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ark Posted July 5, 2007 Share Posted July 5, 2007 With a grand to spend, you're probably best off just looking at doing the fronts properly if you must go aftermarket, otherwise you'll only afford shitty brakes all round. A full set of new UKs with braided lines and good pads / discs are good for most peoples purposes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorin Posted July 5, 2007 Share Posted July 5, 2007 My budget will be between £1k to £1.5k approx. I dont know what I want though, 6 or 8 pot, size of disc, front and rear etc UK Spec OEM brakes, OEM discs, decent pads and fluid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SupraPL Posted July 5, 2007 Share Posted July 5, 2007 With a grand to spend, you're probably best off just looking at doing the fronts properly if you must go aftermarket, otherwise you'll only afford shitty brakes all round. A full set of new UKs with braided lines and good pads / discs are good for most peoples purposes. UK Spec OEM brakes, OEM discs, decent pads and fluid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Wilson Posted July 5, 2007 Share Posted July 5, 2007 Any updates from anyone on the brakes? Anyone had the full kit (front and rear) fitted? Is it wise to do the brakes all round rather than just the front? In need of a brake upgrade so keeping my options open at the minute, anyones experience with a particular kit would be nice to hear. My budget will be between £1k to £1.5k approx. I dont know what I want though, 6 or 8 pot, size of disc, front and rear etc Thanks 8 pot are a total gimmick and totally unnecessary, even 6 pot are unnecessary, decent sized 4 pots will work fine. Given the budget I'd suggest you use stock UK calipers and discs all round with stainless braided hoses and good pads and fluid. These will handle track days totally satisfactorily, as well as any kind of road usage you throw at them. As to just fitting upgraded brakes to the front, maybe the article i wrote below will help? Brake upgrades can set out to try to achieve several objectives. The commonest are to increase resistance to fade and or increase braking effort for a given pedal effort. IE, the pads are pushed against the discs harder for a given pedal effort than before the upgrade, or the brakes will stop the car from 100 MPH, hard, for more times before fade sets in, than previously. The feel from the pedal, that almost intangible quality, can also be addressed and sometimes improved upon by brake size, or pad material changes, or brake flexi hose upgrades to something less squashy than rubber. It's easy to get carried away by the thought of brake upgrades. The limitation in most cars as to how short a distance they can stop in is tyre friction. Leaving aside pedal feedback, and fade, it is almost certain that a Supra on stock Jap spec brakes will stop in just as short a distance as one with an AP six pot kit on it, a Brembo kit, Pauls KAD kit, or whatever. It may not feel to the driver that it does, but usually such is the case if you just nail the pedal as hard as you can. The fancy kits may *FEEL* to stop the car faster, due to less pedal effort, and a better bite, but in reality, if you hit the pedal as hard as you can with stock Jap spec brakes, UK spec brakes, AP kit, KAD, whatever, the car will stop in the same distance. Repeat this test 10 times and stock Jap brakes may be on fire and long since faded, or the fluid boiled, UK ones may be very hot and bothered, but the upgraded ones will probably still be working within pad, disc and brake fluid temp limits. Add in the intangible "feel" factor, and a desire to brake as hard as possible, using as little skill as possible, but WITHOUT relying on the ABS to take over, and for sure a well set up brake upgrade may well allow more finesse. Herein though lies the rub. Upgrade only the fronts and the brake balance of the stock car may well be compromised. Let's take stock brakes. You press smoothly on the brake pedal with (say) 50 pounds force. The car stops fine. 70 pounds, the fronts are just beginning to lock (car makers ALWAYS aim for the fronts to lock first, as rear wheel lock makes the car very unstable and liable to swap ends). The rears are doing as much work as the brake engineers deemed safe to prevent premature rear lock up. The ABS cuts in, and maximum retardation has been reached. Now, take a car with big front discs and calipers. Only 40 pounds pressure now gives a smooth, lock free and powerful retardation. 50 pounds and the new, more powerful, (for the same pedal pressure), fronts are locking. The ABS cuts in. BUT, and this is the crux, those original rear calipers and discs are still well below the caliper pressure where they are able to achieve maximum retardation without fear of the rears locking. In other words the FRONT brakes are doing TOO MUCH work, albeit without breaking into a sweat, and the rears are, to exaggerate a bit, just along for the ride. The BEST scenario is to upgrade front AND rear brakes, carefully ensuring the original balance of effort at any given brake pedal pressure remains as designed, but that the more efficient front AND rear brakes stay cooler for more hard stops, and that old intangible "feel" from the brake pedal is improved, at lower rates of driver effort on the pedal. The latter may or may not be good or desirable, and can be engineered out by changing BOTH front and rear caliper piston sizes, or pad areas. In a race car the balance would be adjustable via 2 brake master cylinders, with a driver selectable change in mechanical leverage effort between front and rear brake circuits, one cylinder operating the front brake calipers, the other the rear. This can also be achieved on road cars, but to do so is usually complex and expensive, especially if ABS and brake circuit failure safeguards are to be maintained. It is far easier to calculate the caliper and disc sizes, along with pad area and compound to achieve this, as near as available off the shelf equipment will allow. Caveat. I said before makers engineer more effort on the front brakes to encourage straight line stopping if the tyres are locked up . They err on the excessive side, as, in the wet, the rear tyres can take a lot more braking effort than in the dry, due to less weight transfer onto the front tyres, as they will lock before as much weight is transferred when the grip of the road surface is reduced. So adding yet more front brake effort worsens this existing imbalance, especially in the wet. If it were not for the ABS the front wheels would be locking up very early. On the Supra a relatively sophisticated ABS allows some effort to be taken off JUST the fronts, and an artificial and very inefficient balance is returned. On cars with lesser (1 or 2 channel) ABS, or no ABS at all, a brake upgrade on just one end of the car can be lethal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ark Posted July 5, 2007 Share Posted July 5, 2007 So Chris, if I read your article right, we could achieve better braking by increasing the width of the front tyres? Within reason of course - I'm talking about 255's instead of 235's, rather than whacking on gynormohugemongous brakes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPRASUZUKI Posted July 5, 2007 Share Posted July 5, 2007 UK Spec OEM brakes, OEM discs, decent pads and fluid. An interesting comparison from another brake thread. Here's the link. http://planetsoarer.com/suprabrakesI...akeUpgrade.htm Braking performance comparison: Vehicle Braking horsepower Ferrari F1 7000+ Porsche Twin Turbo GT1 2060 Brembo/AP 6 pot 385mm discs 2040 Mercedes Brabus V12 1950 Supra TT 4 pots with Mintex grooved discs 1760 Wilwood Rallystop 4pot 355mm discs 1750 Brembo/AP 6 pot 355mm discs 1680 Maclaren F1 1670 Supra TT 4 pots 1665 Wilwood Rallystop 4pot 320mm discs 1640 Brembo/AP 6 pot 320mm discs 1590 Porsche 996 C2/C4 1590 Ferrari 456GT 1480 Supra / Soarer TT 2 pots 1010 Lamborghini Muira (1966) 780 Ford Mondeo 2Ltr Saloon 700 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Wilson Posted July 5, 2007 Share Posted July 5, 2007 So Chris, if I read your article right, we could achieve better braking by increasing the width of the front tyres? Within reason of course - I'm talking about 255's instead of 235's, rather than whacking on gynormohugemongous brakes. If by better braking you mean better brake balance then that would be one way. In an ideal world you need manually adjustable brake balance to suit the prevailing conditions. This is possible, in fact i converted my Skyline to bias adjustable brakes, but it's VERY involved. There are many none brake related caveats to running bigger tyres on most road cars though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Wilson Posted July 5, 2007 Share Posted July 5, 2007 An interesting comparison from another brake thread. Here's the link. http://planetsoarer.com/suprabrakesI...akeUpgrade.htm Braking performance comparison: Vehicle Braking horsepower Ferrari F1 7000+ Porsche Twin Turbo GT1 2060 Brembo/AP 6 pot 385mm discs 2040 Mercedes Brabus V12 1950 Supra TT 4 pots with Mintex grooved discs 1760 Wilwood Rallystop 4pot 355mm discs 1750 Brembo/AP 6 pot 355mm discs 1680 Maclaren F1 1670 Supra TT 4 pots 1665 Wilwood Rallystop 4pot 320mm discs 1640 Brembo/AP 6 pot 320mm discs 1590 Porsche 996 C2/C4 1590 Ferrari 456GT 1480 Supra / Soarer TT 2 pots 1010 Lamborghini Muira (1966) 780 Ford Mondeo 2Ltr Saloon 700 Link no workey, figures no comprehendy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.