supra-lover Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 ???????????????/???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terribleturner Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 I was looking at some NA-T's with T67's and bigger on the other day over on the NA-T Forum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
n00b Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 Prof. Monkey is running 231.8bhp ... thats the highest i have seen on here depends if your counting nos or not / tubby or not Charlie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supra-lover Posted July 24, 2006 Author Share Posted July 24, 2006 Prof. Monkey is running 231.8bhp ... thats the highest i have seen on here depends if your counting nos or not / tubby or not Charlie mmmmm you would think the engine would be more than capable of producing more power,, must be able to get 250 i'm certain at the wheels???? what do you think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terribleturner Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 Suki69 i think her username is, Jenny, is running about 400fwhp. GazziGSI is also running similar i belive but can't remeber what his came out as. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supra-lover Posted July 24, 2006 Author Share Posted July 24, 2006 Suki69 i think her username is, Jenny, is running about 400fwhp. GazziGSI is also running similar i belive but can't remeber what his came out as. ??????? with or without a turbo?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terribleturner Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 With Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
letmeshowyou Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 whats she done recently James? she said 305rwhp last time we spoke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terribleturner Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 ah may have been apoligies, so many numbers so little time. I couldn't remember if it was 3 or 400. Are you sure it was that low?? I thought it was higher as it should be closer to BPU bhp. But i do get confussed easily lately Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
letmeshowyou Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 yeah pretty sure thats what she said (but that was on standard N/A injectors I believe). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
n00b Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 yeah but thats with tubbys (surely?).... i think the question is more what the fatest na (not na-t) ... and for that i think your going to be looking at nos... there was a fella (cant remember his username ... whoops) at mascrat manor putting through 100 bar of nos in his na.... he was pulling the same drag times as the mid TT's. i think you would have to spend a serious amount of money to get to 250 without turbos... single kits are coming downin price for na's all the time... mkiv store are aboutto launch a nat kit for around £2000... you would almost be better spending cash on that rather than trying to squezze 250 out of the engine.... (i know your pain mate sometimes i wish mine was a little faster, but on the plus side i drive it 75 miles everday and its really reliable and i only have to sell 1 kidney to keep it in fuel... not all tt owners can say that ) n00b Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sleeky Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 I remember a jap tuning house (or maybe the australians thinking about it...) have had a VVTI 2JZ-GE running at a TT style 280bhp while keeping it nasp Just trying to remember where i heard this... If i remember correctly the engine was blueprinted completely, was running forged and lightened internals, high compression etc....you name it - it had it. Pretty sure they needed a special mixture to do it, even 100ron fuel wouldnt have been enough. Think they were using some strong methonol based mixture or something. Revved to like 8 or 9k if i remember correctly. I'll try to find the details Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bolarbag Posted July 25, 2006 Share Posted July 25, 2006 Is there no Supra N/A's running ITB's? I've seen the NSX run ITB's why has no one designed them for Supra? With ITB's and perhaps progressive nos, forged internals I'd be expecting around the 320-350mark...no? WOuld be real good to see the results...torquey and responsive apart from the fact it would sound like the dogs bollocks!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Posted July 25, 2006 Share Posted July 25, 2006 This thread reminded me of a mkivsupra.net classic : http://www.mkivsupra.net/vbb/showthread.php?t=66377 What a character old Supra01 was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bolarbag Posted July 25, 2006 Share Posted July 25, 2006 Amazing project if you had money to burn, but that aint gonna happen, so just keep it a nice thought! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GazzaGSi Posted July 25, 2006 Share Posted July 25, 2006 Mine come out at 374 bhp @ the wheels with the turbo conversion Very pleased. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bromy Posted July 25, 2006 Share Posted July 25, 2006 Mine come out at 374 bhp @ the wheels with the turbo conversion Very pleased. That seems a bit low according to this http://www.clubna-t.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2018 :search: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedM Posted July 25, 2006 Share Posted July 25, 2006 Although I can't find it I believe Lucifer is building a 300bhp NA. Of course, I may have been drunk at the time so apologies if I'm way off the mark. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Headroom Posted July 25, 2006 Share Posted July 25, 2006 Although I can't find it I believe Lucifer is building a 300bhp NA. Of course, I may have been drunk at the time so apologies if I'm way off the mark. No, your right, i've read it too!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedM Posted July 25, 2006 Share Posted July 25, 2006 I can't find it though. I don't think it had it's own thread it was just mentioned somewhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daston Posted July 25, 2006 Share Posted July 25, 2006 yeah but isnt Martin boring it out to 3.4l? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bromy Posted July 25, 2006 Share Posted July 25, 2006 Have you any idea how much the 3.4 stroker kit costs, you are talking thousands, think around 6+ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prof. Monkey Posted July 25, 2006 Share Posted July 25, 2006 Prof. Monkey is running 231.8bhp ... thats the highest i have seen on here depends if your counting nos or not / tubby or not Charlie Thanks for the compliment, if I may be as bold as to take it as that! Lucifer @ MKIVStore have a rebuilt engine that is 300bhp at the fly, completely NA, he wants about £4000 for it. Regarding the ITB's I would love to do that, rather than what I have. Can yu imagine 6 mikuni's from a Kawasaki, or similar. Remaining NA is a very attractive option, if not a little expensive, the only thing I dont like about Turbo option, is the loss of the sound my car makes, people have commented on how good it sounds with the combination of the XERD Header, Blitz NUR and the DaveH Intake... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prof. Monkey Posted July 25, 2006 Share Posted July 25, 2006 No, your right, i've read it too!! He offered it to jim_supra, when he had to replace his engine, apparently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
n00b Posted July 25, 2006 Share Posted July 25, 2006 Thanks for the compliment, if I may be as bold as to take it as that! naa it wasnt a compliment mate charlie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now