Jump to content
The mkiv Supra Owners Club

vote for Best British design and Why


Tom S

Recommended Posts

Sorry - you hit a nerve there :D

 

Mike

 

Sorry dude, no offense intended. How were you involved?

 

Its this bloody definiton of "design". For me, it boils down to does it all work in the final analysis. Concorde: Brilliant Engineering, absolutely no doubt. Beautiful styling. There's nothing so sexy as something which has to look that good just through its function.

 

BUT... lousy business case, and that's what has killed pretty much all the other attempts at a commercial supersonic jet liner too, with the possible execption of the Tu-144 which just seemed doomed from the start.

 

What's the Japanese one all about? Not heard of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the Spitfire.......

Concorde.........

 

but NOT the Harrier Jump Jet ?!?!?!?!?!?!?!? :blink:

 

EVEN the YANKS had to give in and 'borrow' it permanently ! ! !

 

The russians copied it, and NOW the Yanks have finally superseded it,

but it's taken a year....or TWO ! ! !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

..... with the possible execption of the Tu-144 which just seemed doomed from the start.

 

What's the Japanese one all about? Not heard of that.

 

 

WARNING...WARNING...Thread tangent ahead!....

 

Did anybody know that one of the Tu-144's has been re-engined with General Electric motors, for research purposes, sponsored by Lockheed I believe, looks the Americans are into Supersonic transport again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry dude, no offense intended. How were you involved?

 

Its this bloody definiton of "design". For me, it boils down to does it all work in the final analysis. Concorde: Brilliant Engineering, absolutely no doubt. Beautiful styling. There's nothing so sexy as something which has to look that good just through its function.

 

BUT... lousy business case, and that's what has killed pretty much all the other attempts at a commercial supersonic jet liner too, with the possible execption of the Tu-144 which just seemed doomed from the start.

 

What's the Japanese one all about? Not heard of that.

 

I'd love to say I was involved, but unfortunately I wasn't. My only real connection with Concorde was that I was born as the first commercial flight was taking off in 1976.

 

I've always been fascinated by Concorde though, and it's probably the main reason why I ended up in the career I did. I'm just bitter because I never got to fly on her.

 

Japan test flew a scale prototype at Woomera range in Australia late last year Article here

 

Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Errr! Not quite correct Bobbeh..well known fact the Russians copied us, they even had spies in the factory at Filton. The only piece of info they didn't get was the correct profile of the leading edge of the wing, which is why the Tupolev (Concordski) had canards fitted just behind the cockpit.:zen:

 

 

Lazarus !! Concord Freak !! French lover !!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the Spitfire.......

Concorde.........

 

but NOT the Harrier Jump Jet ?!?!?!?!?!?!?!? :blink:

 

EVEN the YANKS had to give in and 'borrow' it permanently ! ! !

 

The russians copied it, and NOW the Yanks have finally superseded it,

but it's taken a year....or TWO ! ! !

 

Yeah but they needed the Brits in to help with the VTOL technology...

 

Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think its got to be the internet, beacause it saves 50% of the population from having to sneak in and out of the sex shop....................:innocent:

 

Seriously I would go for ABS (plastics). Do the job magnificently and think where we'd be without them.......:search:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. You might also be interested in our Guidelines, Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.