Jump to content
The mkiv Supra Owners Club

Poor kid


Jake

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 111
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Maybe there should be a law against anyone that pretty and young being a teacher? It was going to go wrong at some point!!! Even so... my God, can you imagine the bragging he did to his mates??? Maybe they didn't beleive him so he prosecuted her to prove it to them? Can't imagine any other reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't get you lot.

She's a PAEDOPHILE. If it had been a male teacher and a 14yr old girl then you lot would be wanting to hang him up by his balls.:shrug:

She abused a "child" in her care.Albeit a 14yr old boy, does that make it anymore acceptable because she's a "hottie"? She was a teacher and he was a special needs pupil.

 

So by your standards its ok for gary Glitter to carry on is it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Terry S
Maybe there should be a law against anyone that pretty and young being a teacher? It was going to go wrong at some point!!! Even so... my God, can you imagine the bragging he did to his mates??? Maybe they didn't beleive him so he prosecuted her to prove it to them? Can't imagine any other reason.

 

 

Maybe she was a crap shag LOL

 

Seriously, some people don't know how lucky they are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't get you lot.

She's a PAEDOPHILE. If it had been a male teacher and a 14yr old girl then you lot would be wanting to hang him up by his balls.:shrug:

She abused a "child" in her care.Albeit a 14yr old boy, does that make it anymore acceptable because she's a "hottie"? She was a teacher and he was a special needs pupil.

 

So by your standards its ok for gary Glitter to carry on is it?

 

:yeahthat:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest chiefvinso
I don't get you lot.

She's a PAEDOPHILE. If it had been a male teacher and a 14yr old girl then you lot would be wanting to hang him up by his balls.:shrug:

She abused a "child" in her care.Albeit a 14yr old boy, does that make it anymore acceptable because she's a "hottie"? She was a teacher and he was a special needs pupil.

 

So by your standards its ok for gary Glitter to carry on is it?

I agree, not normally with the police but this is spot on.:blahblah:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't get you lot.

She's a PAEDOPHILE. If it had been a male teacher and a 14yr old girl then you lot would be wanting to hang him up by his balls.:shrug:

She abused a "child" in her care.Albeit a 14yr old boy, does that make it anymore acceptable because she's a "hottie"? She was a teacher and he was a special needs pupil.

 

So by your standards its ok for gary Glitter to carry on is it?

 

Keith and I were chatting about it last night, its just wrong. What would a woman of that age see in a 14 yr old boy? She probably wasn't lacking male attention within her own peer group. Wrong, wrong, wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel sorry for the young man and his family.

I really do hope that he'll manage to pick up the pieces and go on with his shattered life.

Scarred for ever, yes, but what doesn't kill us makes us stronger.

 

 

 

 

http://www.max-boost.co.uk/stuff/guy_rolling_on_floor_laughing_md_clr.gif

PS

Are you guys for real?:confused:

Look at the bottom of this page, she's posing for magazines

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Paedophilia purely through age is nowhere near as bad as rape paedophilia though, and of the consenting cases the young male cases aren't as bad as the young female cases (IMO).

 

OMG that's a bit of a sweeping generalisation isn't it??? Isn't all peadophilia through age ie someone getting of on looking at or sleeping with younger people than themselves?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not trying to be high and mighty about this just that there is a more serious issue than "lucky bugger nailed his hot teacher".

 

Paedophilia is paedophilia, regardless of the gender of the victim or perpetrator, and sorry a 14 year old, IN LAW, cannot give consent. I've read the article and there's no denying that the "victim" concerned was no angel, but she was a TEACHER and he was a pupil those are facts. She was meant to be teaching him to read.

 

If you had a 14 year old son, and his teacher had sex with him would you be patting him on the back and saying "good on yer son"?

 

Yes there are some very sophisticated teenagers out there, there always has been.But there's also some very vulnerable teenagers out there.

 

Yes she's a very attractive woman. But there's a massive difference between fantasising about your teacher and having sex with them.

 

She was in a position of trust which she abused.Which makes the offence even more serious.

 

I know there's a jokey side to this she's hot, he's a lucky sod etc, but the point is simple.She is a PAEDOPHILE. FACT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. You might also be interested in our Guidelines, Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.