Jump to content
The mkiv Supra Owners Club

Looking for advice


ste-dub

Recommended Posts

Hi folks

 

This has probably been asked 1000 times over but looking for the pros and cons from people with experience and not just opinions.

 

My 1993 1a1 w58 2jzge is currently away getting a windows out repaint. When it comes back I'll be beginning to save for either a na-t kit or a aristo 2jzgte vvti swap(financially the non vvti will be outta reach).

 

I have no plans to change the w58 gearbox as it's only a Sunday car with only 120k kms so 380 to 400bhp will have me happy.

 

I've worked out that both routes will cost roughly the same So all that being said

 

What route would you take and why??

 

Appreciate your input

 

Steven

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally the VVTI engine would be better route for me as it's OEM to a degree. A well done single setup is going to cost you a lot more in my opinion.

 

The W58 will probably struggle in both circumstances. Most people who have them on BPU have at least 2-3 spares hanging around.

Edited by Ric (see edit history)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

NA-t is only worth doing if you are auto.

 

Being manual puts you at risk and changing the transmission makes it not really worth it anymore.

 

I am NA-t, R154. I would kill for a vvti engine. If you've got the choice, take that route.

 

400hp will always whatever anyone says be cheaper with an NA-t. You'll see many challenging discussions on what parts to use, regarding price range and `quality` based on opinion. But I think I'm one of the few who has done both budget tuning and gone all out on premium parts with another rebuild down the line.

 

THAT SAID, you run more risk, have a higher hassle factor and limit yourself to BIGGER costs if you desire 600hp.

 

The vvti with m3 box on offer, would be a better route mate! Old turbos? Worn seals? Still worth the vvti engine in my opinion.

Edited by Noz (see edit history)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not conversant with the VVTI, but the people who are recommending it have good credability on this Club site. To be honest i was not aware of this VVTI availability to achieve what i was looking for three years ago, i will investigate this now, all be it my car is now very sound, reliable, and very fast, circa 425BHP @ 1.4Bar. total spend to date £6K., all the cost has been added to my "Agreed value" Insurance. Let me know which way you choose to go? Herbie.

 

BEST.PIC.1..JPEG..jpg (730.2 KB)

BON.&BUMP. LOUVERS.2019.JPEG..jpg (630.8 KB)

BEST.PIC.1..JPEG..jpg

BON.&BUMP. LOUVERS.2019.JPEG..jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Adam, I bet you can guess what the RS badge is ! I could PM and tell you, but may be many other members would also like to know, at my expense. I put the badge on 23 years ago when i bought the car new, it was a "Boy Racer" thing at the time.

 

I used to tell the uninitiated that it was a special car done by "Lexus", the "RS Rally Supra" , my life long problem is, they believed it. lol.

 

Anyway i am going to remove it now that you have exposed me and remove the two hairy dice on my rear view mirror as well. I have a AMG Merc. Est car, but that is not a fake. lol. Herbie.

Edited by herbiemercman (see edit history)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Aristo swap is not without problems......from memory the Aristo has the ECU in the engine bay and so the loom is too short to just use 'as is'

 

Also it's not rear sumped and the rear sumps can be rare/costly.

 

I'm sure there are other differences?

 

 

NA-T seems to vary in cost but per Noz it can/should be cheaper if you do only want 350-380? Lot's of it depends on your wishes or your DIY skills etc.

 

Gut feel is that a 320 bhp NA-T would feel better/more eager/more of an event to drive, than the silky smooth/quiet/stock like untuned stock boost 320bhp Aristo?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Aristo swap is not without problems......from memory the Aristo has the ECU in the engine bay and so the loom is too short to just use 'as is'

 

Also it's not rear sumped and the rear sumps can be rare/costly.

 

I'm sure there are other differences?

 

 

NA-T seems to vary in cost but per Noz it can/should be cheaper if you do only want 350-380? Lot's of it depends on your wishes or your DIY skills etc.

 

Gut feel is that a 320 bhp NA-T would feel better/more eager/more of an event to drive, than the silky smooth/quiet/stock like untuned stock boost 320bhp Aristo?

 

I think the GTE cost is labour through most people not having the ability or equipment.

 

With fitting a turbo. 320hp or 400hp has no difference I can see. As it's the installation and setup of the boost.

 

Some would say a fuel pump or injectors is needed. But I ran with stock GE components at 417 without issues. Both are cheap anyway.

 

The parts list and labour would both be the same for 300 or 400hp for the GE. 450 ideally should use injectors and a pump.

 

If you were doing the work yourself I think a GTE swap would be massively beneficial. Probably same cost on parts but no mapping needed and no hassle factor fitting custom parts.

 

I'd love to see a 58mm NAt. Or even smaller. Spool would be amazing. Stock compression. I considered it at one point but worried I woildnt hit my goal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was looking into the same and have quoted for some prices from reputable shops.

aristo 2jz gte swap - parts 5-7k, labour 2k

na-t 400-450hp - 7-8k

 

I guess it depends on what are your goals, I think it is cheaper to go NA-T if you are shooting for big power. I you want 400hp GTE swap might make sense, if you want 600+ go for NA-T, you need the turbo kit, pistons, head gasket, arp studs and you are good to go (if you have the stronger pre-vvti rods).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was looking into the same and have quoted for some prices from reputable shops.

aristo 2jz gte swap - parts 5-7k, labour 2k

na-t 400-450hp - 7-8k

 

I guess it depends on what are your goals, I think it is cheaper to go NA-T if you are shooting for big power. I you want 400hp GTE swap might make sense, if you want 600+ go for NA-T, you need the turbo kit, pistons, head gasket, arp studs and you are good to go (if you have the stronger pre-vvti rods).

 

No buddy. The opposite. I have 600 and didnt do pistons. The expensive part for NAt at 600 is resolving a transmission strong enough! Then the intake isnt man enough.

 

There are plenty of other road blocks for an NA to go for power. Always start with a GTE.

 

I didnt because I had most of the bits anyway.

 

Trust me what a ball ache lol..

 

Anyone owning an NA wanting 600hp and they currently have no turbo needs to save for a TT6 or a single turbo already done.

Edited by Noz (see edit history)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great, the Irishman has got this ball rolling, well done. I am so glad i have my NAT, it has all the best bits now and the driving is awsom and thanks to Noz who helped me a lot, i just need to take my RS badge off the front of the car now. lol. Herbie.

 

I think you'll find that once that badge is removed, your driving dynamics will improve even further! :p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. You might also be interested in our Guidelines, Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.