Jump to content
The mkiv Supra Owners Club

London Bridge & Borough Market - WTF!


Frank Bullitt

Recommended Posts

Send Corbyn in, he can have a chat with the terrorists and get them to see sense and not to be so naughty.

 

I would send May, she would reduce police forces even more for a strong and stable butcheries at London streets...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would send May, she would reduce police forces even more for a strong and stable butcheries at London streets...

 

Regardless of police levels you won't stop these nutters unless we get tough and bang them up before they go out to kill rather than wait until they are on their way to carry out an attack. But this will be met with the candle lighters and brainwashed PC brigade kicking off about human rights. Corbyn is a complete knobber, Abbott is a useless racist who has been tucked out the way because she's an absolute fool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not that simple though, you have to have a prosecutable case. We can't start locking people up without trial, as that is a very slippery slope.

 

As long as its terror related i don't have a problem with it tbh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's nothing fair about this situation, time we turned this round and started playing hard ball with these fuckers.

 

If your not doing anything wrong or planning to then what do you have to worry about ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's a difficult one, lots think let's just lock up the ones that have done things to get themselves noted on a 'person on interest' list but then it could lead to abuse and innocents caught up in it (saying 'so what' is easier if you aren't middle eastern in appearance!)

 

Also perhaps it makes it currently easier to trace the whole network/organisation if these people are known and left to plan/organise to a degree?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one has stated locking them up without trial.

 

Its about having the right to detain them and question them, which happens if you are suspected of committing any crime.

 

Its about stopping them from re entering the country if its believed they have left for terror reasons or been to questionable areas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do you legally prevent a UK national from entering the UK without a trial? You can't leave them stateless (see article 8 of the UN "Statelessness Reduction Convention, 1961").

 

Maybe I have interpreted Article 8 wrong, because article 8.3 says otherwise.

 

And a person can be detained in foreign countries before they enter the UK.

Or when they have entered, IE at the airport they can be detained at the airport.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't detain them indefinitely though, that's an absolute parallel to imprisonment without trial.

 

Oh I agree that is absurd.

And that's not what is being said.

 

If I'm suspected of a crime, I'm either taken to the police station under my own esteem for questioning, or I'm arrested and detained for questioning.

If they believe there is a case, then I'm charged with said crime.

 

Then released, depending on the nature of the crime until trial.

 

I had all this when I was accused of affray for beating down two attackers.

 

Yet someone of interest on a terrorist watchlist is allowed to waltz around and travel to Libya and back and nothing happen.

 

That's the injustice here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, I agree. But revoking someone's passport while abroad is not something I agree with. Holding them on entry for the purposes of a trial (or questioning) is fine. But simply saying "don't let the back in" as a blanket policy isn't something I could get behind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well you should. The right to a fair trial is what stops governments locking people up on a whim.

 

Nonsensical statement entirely. Human rights and "fair trials" go out the window with these absolute violent scum. If there is anything suspect and if there has been any involvement with radical preaching/IS then they should immediately be deported or detained in or outside the U.K. and not subject to a fair trial.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, I agree. But revoking someone's passport while abroad is not something I agree with. Holding them on entry for the purposes of a trial (or questioning) is fine. But simply saying "don't let the back in" as a blanket policy isn't something I could get behind.

 

It's not revoking someone's passport.

 

And not letting them in means not letting them roam the streets.

 

But if someone who's about to kill humans, ultimately removing someone's human right to live, then they don't deserve sh*t and I would happily end their life!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. You might also be interested in our Guidelines, Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.