Jump to content
The mkiv Supra Owners Club

Black Intercooler Better Performance....


a98pmalcolm

Recommended Posts

First of all, Mighty Car mods are really good fun.

 

Regarding painting it black, then they did not take in consideration, the heat from the engine/radiator.

 

But could be fun to see a real test with a car and dyno.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't see how that's possible, I'd guess something went wrong with their test.

 

Its to do with the fact that black will absorb all wavelengths of light, though what I hadn't taken into consideration is that it would make a difference in the emission of heat too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Begs to ask the question, what was the ambient temp between the tests??

I would take this video with a pinch of salt.

 

Don't you think that if it made a huge difference then car manufactures that spend billions on research per year would have already researched and tested this??

Don't you also think that the new F1 cars (which have intercooler heat soak issues) would also have black intercoolers if it made any difference??

 

I am sure the likes of Toyota, GM, BMW and the all the F1 teams have better test equipment then a hairdryer a few heat sensors, a cheapo intercooler and a car fan :)...

 

I rest my case

Link to comment
Share on other sites

confusion between convection, conduction and radiation

 

Nail hit on the head there I think :) You'd only make conduction worse by adding another layer (i.e. paint), and it's conduction via moving air contact that provides the cooling here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well regarding the F1 cars there not black maybe as the video showed during airflow it wasn't quite as good. But during no airflow it was better. F1 cars don't really sit at idle often lol...

 

I'm no engineer or material designee but just a chat about the possibility that during idle the black one could be better...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not many cars make boost at idle. The main criteria is how they reject heat when on boost, which would normally equal under motion, and not working as radiators. The problem is people accept the term "radiator" as the norm for a water to air heat exchanger, but for an intercooler, they accept the term "intercooler", where both perform similar functions. The correct term is "heat exchanger" and how heat is exchanged differs greatly between radiation, conduction and convection. The tests and desired properties differ greatly. I believe they misrepresented the desired effects in the video.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not many cars make boost at idle. The main criteria is how they reject heat when on boost, which would normally equal under motion, and not working as radiators. The problem is people accept the term "radiator" as the norm for a water to air heat exchanger, but for an intercooler, they accept the term "intercooler", where both perform similar functions. The correct term is "heat exchanger" and how heat is exchanged differs greatly between radiation, conduction and convection. The tests and desired properties differ greatly. I believe they misrepresented the desired effects in the video.

 

Amen sir :salute:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. You might also be interested in our Guidelines, Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.