herbiemercman Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 hi everyone, my friend has just aquired a nisan 350z and he states the BHP to be 265. ? he also states that the supra mk4 non turbo is 225BHP, is this correct. ? herbiemercman. SUPRA. SUP. SIDE.BEST PICT. JAN 2012..jpg (88.4 KB) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan_Turism0 Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 i believe it's actually quoted at 220bhp for the NA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
herbiemercman Posted March 6, 2013 Author Share Posted March 6, 2013 (edited) Thankyou dan, wonder how nisan managed the extra 45 BHP from a similar normaly aspirated engine. ? also your car looks great and the bird. herbiemercman. Edited March 6, 2013 by herbiemercman spelling (see edit history) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaz6002 Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 Thankyou dan, wonder how nisa managed the extra 45BHP from a similar normal aspirated engine. ? herbiemercman. Errrr it's not really that similar thought is it? It's 500cc bigger for starters. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bambisdad Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 The figure of 220HP is when new. Any 20 year old motor is going to have lost quite a few of its horses by now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 Yeah, an extra 16% capacity and an extra 10 years would probably help with that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
d-_-b Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 Errrr it's not really that similar thought is it? It's 500cc bigger for starters. 3.0litre vs 3.5litre Not to mention how much more newer the 350 is.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Raven Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 100 ish at the wheels Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan_Turism0 Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 also the z engine is a v not an i6 :\ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh42 Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 my NA made 176WHP and Rich22.11's made 168WHP at Dynodaze:) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mariusz Posted March 6, 2013 Share Posted March 6, 2013 b;3615740'] 3.0litre vs 3.5litre Not to mention how much more newer the 350 is.. plus v6 vs straight 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
herbiemercman Posted March 7, 2013 Author Share Posted March 7, 2013 So i can change my engine, or change the car for a tt, or buy a box of matches. ? The nisan looks sh-t anyway. herbiemercman. SUPRA JACK'S DRAWING..JPG (59.0 KB) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supra joe Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 So i can change my engine, or change the car for a tt, or buy a box of matches. ? The nisan looks sh-t anyway. herbiemercman. SUPRA JACK'S DRAWING..JPG (59.0 KB) Don't forget the dentist on the 3rd of October or the scary exorcist lady will get you lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calzo21 Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 Don't forget the dentist on the 3rd of October or the scary exorcist lady will get you lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
listy Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 hi everyone, my friend has just aquired a nisan 350z and he states the BHP to be 265. ? he also states that the supra mk4 non turbo is 225BHP, is this correct. ? herbiemercman. SUPRA. SUP. SIDE.BEST PICT. JAN 2012..jpg (88.4 KB) No. An NA has 6 BHP at the fly, 4bhp at the hubs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calzo21 Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 No. An NA has 6 BHP at the fly, 4bhp at the hubs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dnk Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 my NA made 176WHP and Rich22.11's made 168WHP at Dynodaze:) That's pretty close to 200 at the fly then Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fitz Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 Don't forget the dentist on the 3rd of October or the scary exorcist lady will get you lol. EXACTLY the same thing that popped into my head when I opened the pic haha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
herbiemercman Posted March 7, 2013 Author Share Posted March 7, 2013 i know we all like a lot of umph under the hood, it's like having £50 quid in the back rocket instead of a fiver, BUT, i am a biker and rode the tt in IOM etc, so if i took my car with it's 220BHP ON THE TT CIRCUIT WITH ANOTHER MK4 TT OWNER, WHO WOULD DO THE FASTEST LAP. ? HERBIEMERCMAN. http://www.mkivsupra.net/vbb/attachment.php?attachmentid=165403&stc=1&d=1362671693 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob_Mitchell Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 i know we all like a lot of umph under the hood, it's like having £50 quid in the back rocket instead of a fiver, BUT, i am a biker and rode the tt in IOM etc, so if i took my car with it's 220BHP ON THE TT CIRCUIT WITH ANOTHER MK4 TT OWNER, WHO WOULD DO THE FASTEST LAP. ? HERBIEMERCMAN. http://www.mkivsupra.net/vbb/attachment.php?attachmentid=165403&stc=1&d=1362671693 The TT owner would win as NA's are slow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnny g Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 With the same driver, a TT should win. Put Gaz6002 in an N/A and you in yours, Rob. I know who my money would be on! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abz Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 The TT owner would win as NA's are slow. Not really, the one with the most biggest balls would win! An if you need any inspiration then check out Justin Bieber (Adam) who was beating TT's up the strip!! If you want a quicker car or want more power then you have a couple of options. Go NA-T or go TT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tricky-Ricky Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 (edited) LOL! yes the driver with the biggest balls would win, unless they both had big balls, in which case the TT would win, and actually the 350Z lump is actually a design that is older than the Supra, just been a bit more refined over the years. Edited March 7, 2013 by Tricky-Ricky (see edit history) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jcbt Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 i know we all like a lot of umph under the hood, it's like having £50 quid in the back rocket instead of a fiver, BUT, i am a biker and rode the tt in IOM etc, so if i took my car with it's 220BHP ON THE TT CIRCUIT WITH ANOTHER MK4 TT OWNER, WHO WOULD DO THE FASTEST LAP. ? HERBIEMERCMAN. http://www.mkivsupra.net/vbb/attachment.php?attachmentid=165403&stc=1&d=1362671693 Relate it back to bikes - in the dry who would win between a 600 and a 1000 I would expect the same result as na vs tt - no substitute for power on the straights and climbs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob_Mitchell Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 With the same driver, a TT should win. Put Gaz6002 in an N/A and you in yours, Rob. I know who my money would be on! You ever seen me drive? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.