Jump to content
The mkiv Supra Owners Club

Aluminum vs. Steel Strut Braces


CanisLupus

Recommended Posts

I've tried searching for that topic on here but didn't find anything.

 

I have an Aluminum Strut brace installed which i'm intending to change as it isn't stiffenning anything...:rolleyes::rolleyes:

Now i'm trying to find out if Aluminum braces are inferior in terms of stiffening compared to Steel braces? To be more specific i have in mind getting a TRD Steel one or maybe a Tein one:

 

Tein

image

 

The car will be used on track and priority is stiffness not 500grams of weight reduction. :D

 

So what would be the best one to get?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On a double wishbone suspension like the Supras they are practically redundant as the top mount of the coilover experiences very little in the line of lateral stresses unlike a McPherson strut.

 

Having said that I still have one fitted to the car myself, a solid (no hinges or adjusting points) Carbing alloy unit. The main reason for having it is that it doubles as a brake master cylinder brace and stops the bulk head from flexing around the servo under heavy braking.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=162464&d=1357229143

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=162462&d=1357228877

 

A Carbing brace for the NA engine like the one pictured above will also fit a TT engined car, I now have a 1JZ TT engine fitted with this brace in place.

 

A TT brace will NOT fit an NA engined car without work.

DSCF0017(1).jpg

DSCF0013(1).JPG

Edited by pedrosixfour (see edit history)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went with the Carbing as well, the rear one actually bolts to the floor as well as the Struts

I went with the DoLuck rear for this same reason!:)

I was looking through my Stockholm pics and noticed that a few of the standard factory cars have triangulated braces like the Fisker Karma below

http://i1201.photobucket.com/albums/bb343/Suprasun1996/DSC03084_zps62682e93.jpg

MR2s have triangulated braces like this so it's nothing new...I'd say a decent set of ARBs would be more beneficial, but I fitted the strut braces as I like the way they look.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you jack the car up at the front using the middle of the subframe and then try to remove the strut brace, you'll find out it does actually do something :) The droop of both suspension turrets pretty much hold it in place even with the nuts removed. Whether this affects handling perceptibly is a different matter, but there is deffo some flex there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I honestly wouldn't of thought it would make any difference what material it was made from

 

That is the question :D

 

I never really noticed any advantages but i guess you would if you hit the track hard, as they reduce body roll.

 

It will be hitting the track often and HARD! :D

 

I went with the DoLuck rear for this same reason!:)

 

MR2s have triangulated braces like this so it's nothing new...I'd say a decent set of ARBs would be more beneficial, but I fitted the strut braces as I like the way they look.

 

I already have adjustable Titan ARBs and they made considerable difference but i still want to stiffen the car. Next point after the Brace will most likely be a Full Cage ;)

 

If you jack the car up at the front using the middle of the subframe and then try to remove the strut brace, you'll find out it does actually do something :) The droop of both suspension turrets pretty much hold it in place even with the nuts removed. Whether this affects handling perceptibly is a different matter, but there is deffo some flex there.

 

It made a significant difference on my other car regarding the handling. Maybe with the Supras design there will be less effect but it can't hurt? :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless it's welded in, or a really stout triangulated structure it's not going to do anything worthwhile. Most are just expensive shiny bits. The Aristo factory bar looks quite well made, as you would expect. The Fisker attempt looks typical expensive kit car afterthought, and not something they should be very proud of ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless it's welded in, or a really stout triangulated structure it's not going to do anything worthwhile. Most are just expensive shiny bits. The Aristo factory bar looks quite well made, as you would expect. The Fisker attempt looks typical expensive kit car afterthought, and not something they should be very proud of ;)

 

Would you rate the TRD or Tein as such usefull braces? If not how would you build one to be really helpfull in stiffening the front end on a supra? I'm thinking about getting one built anyway.

Edited by CanisLupus (see edit history)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. You might also be interested in our Guidelines, Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.