Havard Posted February 7, 2012 Share Posted February 7, 2012 So you think he was trying to kick parker? If he was doing that why not just punch him in the face? its not like he tried to hide it is it! Firstly let me say that my comments are totally without bias. Liverpool were my second team for a long time as I have always liked the way they play. I was in the pub last night and at the time I never gave it a second thought that it could have been deliberate. I have watched it about three times this morning and I find it difficult to believe that he missed the ball by so far and so late. This is a top class player and I don't believe that he could have got it so wrong. Scott Parker is a PITA to play against and I imagine Suarez is not the first to spy an opportunity to do him. Why not punch him in the face? You would get sent off for that and a three match ban..!! Why not delay your kick by a second and hit a guy right above his balls? I played 11 a side for years and it would be naive to think that people don't think like this. I did..!! H. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Havard Posted February 7, 2012 Share Posted February 7, 2012 http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=ZkPbPSGR5E0 Watched it again and I still can't believe it was an accident. I think Suarez swung his foot and couldn't loose, if he hits the ball and the player it's a win, win. Now should we discuss the eye gouging aswell? One thing that is worrying is the amount of bell ends that are arguing on Youtube about this. Hardly a brain between any of them..!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricky49 Posted February 7, 2012 Share Posted February 7, 2012 witch hunt! Luis ment to kick parker? Then why was he not sent off? why arnt the FA looking into it? Lets face it everytime he does something even remotely bad he will jumped on from a great hight The stake and fire are ready for lighting Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJ Posted February 7, 2012 Share Posted February 7, 2012 http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=ZkPbPSGR5E0 Watched it again and I still can't believe it was an accident..... I agree. IMO, deliberate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonathanc Posted February 7, 2012 Share Posted February 7, 2012 Dont like Suarez, after kicking Parker in the tits last night and never attempted to get the ball just sums him up. A dirty player that the EPL doesnt need and I certainly wouldn't miss. yeah as a liverpool supporter I am really ashamed of that... not really watching footie much nowadays anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnny g Posted February 7, 2012 Share Posted February 7, 2012 The guy is an animal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Raven Posted February 8, 2012 Author Share Posted February 8, 2012 Animal and racist, thug! He is the devil himself! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Havard Posted February 8, 2012 Share Posted February 8, 2012 Animal and racist, thug! He is the devil himself! But what about Suarez? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaveriK Posted February 8, 2012 Share Posted February 8, 2012 Was just listening to talk sport, they were going through the papers. Chicken is out so they have Quin in instead. The Suarez subject and Daglish's attitude came up and i swear Quin pipped up and said that it was understandable that Daglish was upset as Suarez was banned for telling the truth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnny g Posted February 8, 2012 Share Posted February 8, 2012 Was just listening to talk sport, they were going through the papers. Chicken is out so they have Quin in instead. The Suarez subject and Daglish's attitude came up and i swear Quin pipped up and said that it was understandable that Daglish was upset as Suarez was banned for telling the truth. Mick Quinn. I can't take that man sersiously. He's a moron, with an overinflated ego (and beer belly). He is a bitter, abhorrent, idiotic excuse for a "broadcaster". His entire agenda is pro-LFC, anti-MUFC - typical of most LFC fans, sadly. Furthermore, he rubbishes Stoke on a continual basis because he has a personal issue with Pulis. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Havard Posted February 8, 2012 Share Posted February 8, 2012 Mick Quinn. I can't take that man sersiously. He's a moron, with an overinflated ego (and beer belly). He is a bitter, abhorrent, idiotic excuse for a "broadcaster". His entire agenda is pro-LFC, anti-MUFC - typical of most LFC fans, sadly. Furthermore, he rubbishes Stoke on a continual basis because he has a personal issue with Pulis. But besides that is he ok? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnny g Posted February 8, 2012 Share Posted February 8, 2012 But besides that is he ok? I'd still not offer to go for a pint with him... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJ Posted February 9, 2012 Share Posted February 9, 2012 Yet another who feels Dalglish is behaving irresponsibly. http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/opinion/columnists/oliver-holt/Oliver-Holt-column-Why-Liverpool-Manager-Kenny-Dalglish-s-stance-on-Suarez-is-dangerous-disingenuous-and-irresponsible-article862645.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnny g Posted February 9, 2012 Share Posted February 9, 2012 Yet another who feels Dalglish is behaving irresponsibly. http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/opinion/columnists/oliver-holt/Oliver-Holt-column-Why-Liverpool-Manager-Kenny-Dalglish-s-stance-on-Suarez-is-dangerous-disingenuous-and-irresponsible-article862645.html Usually don't mind reading Ollie Holt, but the comment: "Football heroes? Micky Quinn..." just devalued him a little in my eyes. The rest of the article is pretty much nailed on, though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Raven Posted February 9, 2012 Author Share Posted February 9, 2012 I do find his stance strange, he has no problem telling jurnos to sod off i dont see why he just refuses to answer the questions? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJ Posted February 9, 2012 Share Posted February 9, 2012 I do find his stance strange, he has no problem telling jurnos to sod off i dont see why he just refuses to answer the questions? Did you see his recent interview on Sky when asked about Andy Carroll? He immediately went off on one moaning about how people are always asking about that one player an dhow they should get off his back etc and then looked particularly silly when the journo said he wanted to comment on how well Carroll had played! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Raven Posted February 9, 2012 Author Share Posted February 9, 2012 Like i said i can see why he wouldnt put andy down, i see why he hates the Journos, Why even comment on Luis? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJ Posted February 9, 2012 Share Posted February 9, 2012 Like i said i can see why he wouldnt put andy down, i see why he hates the Journos, Why even comment on Luis? He looks to me like a man under extreme pressure who is struggling to handle it. To me, his whole demeanour is one of self defence and almost paranoia. Very odd. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bradleyh_15 Posted February 9, 2012 Share Posted February 9, 2012 He looks to me like a man under extreme pressure who is struggling to handle it. To me, his whole demeanour is one of self defence and almost paranoia. Very odd. Football has changed a lot since he was last managing and I don't think he can handle the press very well! Good motivator and man manager though but agree he looks drained big time compared to when he was just at the club as a talisman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJ Posted February 9, 2012 Share Posted February 9, 2012 Football has changed a lot since he was last managing and I don't think he can handle the press very well! Good motivator and man manager though but agree he looks drained big time compared to when he was just at the club as a talisman I agree. The problem for him will be the increasing amount of pressure as the season goes on. After spending a considerable amount of money to build his own team, the powers that be will be demanding a top 4 finish. If that doesn't happen then the season will probably be deemed a failure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bradleyh_15 Posted February 9, 2012 Share Posted February 9, 2012 I agree. The problem for him will be the increasing amount of pressure as the season goes on. After spending a considerable amount of money to build his own team, the powers that be will be demanding a top 4 finish. If that doesn't happen then the season will probably be deemed a failure. Unfortunately as a Liverpool fan I think we still need a lot of players of quality to strengthen the squad, give depth and create competition for places! Liverpool should see missing out on fourth as a failure every season and this needs to be addressed quickly. Kenny should have an interpreter where he gets asked a question he tells the interpreter the answer and the interpreter says what Kenny really means being pc still lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaveriK Posted February 11, 2012 Share Posted February 11, 2012 Well, that handshake just about sums up Suarez and Daglish's attitude, no class at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJ Posted February 11, 2012 Share Posted February 11, 2012 Well, that handshake just about sums up Suarez and Daglish's attitude, no class at all. Only just saw that. Unbelievable! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bradleyh_15 Posted February 11, 2012 Share Posted February 11, 2012 I think he should have shook his hand! But "if" you were adamant you had not said anything racist and truly believed that you had done nothing wrong would you shake his hand? I'm not condoning it by any stretch of the imagination! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJ Posted February 11, 2012 Share Posted February 11, 2012 I think he should have shook his hand! But "if" you were adamant you had not said anything racist and truly believed that you had done nothing wrong would you shake his hand? I'm not condoning it by any stretch of the imagination! I would have shaken his hand with the least amount of enthusiasm I could muster. To me, that would have shown an end to the matter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.