Si_s Supe Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 If I removed the rear quarter running lights from my facelift and fitted non facelift rear spats, would they be tall enough to cover the holes from the running lights? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Si_s Supe Posted June 8, 2011 Author Share Posted June 8, 2011 I've been looking at a few photos of facelifts with spats on today, and I don't think my theory of pre facelift spats covering the running light holes will work! Anyone got any advice that could confirm? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ripped_fear Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 no they wouldn't be iirc I think the top half of the hole would be on show. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Si_s Supe Posted June 9, 2011 Author Share Posted June 9, 2011 Hmmm. This was my thought. It's a shame as I wouldn't mind loosing the running lights, but as all the paint on the car is original, I don't want to go down the route of filling and painting! So, I will happily live with them!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 Why not just get facelift spats? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Si_s Supe Posted June 9, 2011 Author Share Posted June 9, 2011 Why not just get facelift spats? That's what I shall. The original thought of having pre facelift ones was to delete the red running lights. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Si_s Supe Posted June 9, 2011 Author Share Posted June 9, 2011 Anyone got any facelift spats going?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.