Jump to content
The mkiv Supra Owners Club

So what would cause a stock rod to snap.


hodge

Recommended Posts

Yeah mate , you should see that power then , just be mindful now that u have larger cams and if the timming belt tensoner snaps it could damge ur engine , titan offer a billet timming belt tensioner .

 

Very good advice!

 

Seen it happen twice now on the dyno, One got away with it the other did not and was a complete rebuild

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah mate , you should see that power then , just be mindful now that u have larger cams and if the timming belt tensoner snaps it could damge ur engine , titan offer a billet timming belt tensioner .

 

Beat order 1 of those too then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

95% of the time a snapped rod is caused by an over rev. Jamie's bent rod was almost certainly caused by the piston's partial seizure evident around the ring lands, probably a result in itself of detonation or excess crown temps. Despite what the Americans claim to get away with it's a production engine designed to handle X amount of BHP at Y pounds of boost, on Z octane fuel. For sure, it's a strong engine, but to say the stock bottom end is good for 700 BHP is plainly ludicrous. It may survive it in short bursts, with very safe air fuel ratios, occasionally. It certainly is pushing your luck to expect it to survive a track day, in the summer, driven as hard as it will go. 11 seconds up a drag strip with long cool down periods is one thing. 30 minute sessions round Donington, quite another. The physics of heat rejection are immutable. A proper 700 BHP engine will be freshly built, using mainly new parts, with a steel crank, forged pistons, steel rods, a huge oil cooler, properly ducted rad with maybe the viscous locked solid, and decent fuel on a properly done map, with load points held throughout the map to allow temps to stabilise on the dyno, not mapped via datalogs of AFR from inertial runs through one gear, done in a few seconds. I cringe at these high mileage engines that really should be used with respect in stock form, in their latter years, being asked to produce monstrous power on tired bottom ends, and leaky valves ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not being personal, even Skyline engines sometimes decide they have had enough. This was an old engine of mine that went beyond its maintenance hours and decided to break a Tomei rod bolt. No over revving, just old age and fatigue.

 

http://www.gatesgarth.com/bang/bang.html "It'll manage one more track day, then it can be rebuilt over the winter". Right...... ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not being personal, even Skyline engines sometimes decide they have had enough. This was an old engine of mine that went beyond its maintenance hours and decided to break a Tomei rod bolt. No over revving, just old age and fatigue.

 

http://www.gatesgarth.com/bang/bang.html "It'll manage one more track day, then it can be rebuilt over the winter". Right...... ;)

 

Thats a right mess..

 

From my experience with my 4A-GE 20V, the rods tend to snap with excessive revs.. The car revs to 8200rpm stock, they can rev to 9000rpm "safely".. Some ppl have pushed them to 9500rpm, many have snapped them after 9000rpm..

 

Jamies rod is not revs for sure, just metal pushed past its limit for too long..

 

I tend to agree with Chris, I think someone who has used a high power supra for a long time (every day, track and drag use) on the stock bottom end might be a decent benchmark to determine a "safe" limit...

 

Just my thoughts...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A rod will bend in compression, like JP's, due to one or more of three things. Hydraulic lock due to incompressible fluid above the piston. Piston seizure making it all but impossible for the crank and rod to push / pull the piston up and down the bore (50 / 50 as to whether the rod bends in compression, or snaps in extension here, depending on the forces and timing of the event). Massive cylinder pressures due to very excessive boost. Obviously the strength of the rods will dictate how much abuse they will stand, and a steel rod will stretch or bend before failing, whereas a sintered rod will usually just fail catastrophically.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2.4 bar is a LOT of boost. I think that, and the rods DEFINITELY think that, too ;) Quite impressed by the S shape without a total failure though! I take it the artificially shortened rod caused the underside of the piston to touch the crank counterweight? Did it chop off the oil squirter nozzle, too?

 

A friend of mine had a wonderful "Black Museum" cupboard with some remarkable bits of blown engines on display. The cupboard bore a nice engraved sign proclaiming "Maximum power comes at unforeseen prices, how fast can YOU afford to go" ;)

Edited by Chris Wilson (see edit history)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. You might also be interested in our Guidelines, Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.