Jump to content
The mkiv Supra Owners Club

Driving idiots


monsween

Recommended Posts

But if you realised you were coming down a sliproad where for some reason a lorry is on your side or coming up it, you would think, "oh dear, I'm not where I should be. Instead of speeding up and seeing if it's correct when Im dead I'll pull over safely now and u-turn when it's clear to do so."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That video is another reason why all drivers should have to re-sit the driving test every few years. I doubt whether the car driver makes a daily habit of driving the wrong way on slip-roads, but I reckon that their grasp of road sense will have fallen so far short of what is acceptable, such that there is a fair chance they'd do something else a bit silly on a test to mean they don't pass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But if you realised you were coming down a sliproad where for some reason a lorry is on your side or coming up it, you would think, "oh dear, I'm not where I should be. Instead of speeding up and seeing if it's correct when Im dead I'll pull over safely now and u-turn when it's clear to do so."

 

That would require common sense something this person obviously lacks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Omg, ! How do people like this get licenced in the first place !

 

They were probably better drivers when they passed. Obviously in some cases, that may have been 50+ years ago. Their eyesight, hearing, reactions and road-sense may have gone downhill since then, but with no regular re-test, who's to say they can't drive?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm honestly not shocked that I'm witnessing a video like that. Some of the stupid things I have seen of late have really left me with the knowledge that these things are very possible. There is a very similar, non confusing, road near myself. When leaving Larkhall heading towards the motorway the opposing lane forks off so that each lane is single. The lane that disappears is clearly the opposite direction as it doesn't change from the town centre till it splits, it has large signs saying "No Entry" and yet every few months I hear, or even see myself, people thinking that it is a way to the motorway and head down. Now, there is no logical reason for this, you would be crossing over a solid white line, passing onto a lane with huge "No Entry" signs and driving down a road with no roadsigns. So to me, logic doesn't come into it. Sheer bewilderment is the only thing I can put it down to.

 

Fortunately I have missed the mugs driving down that road, as it splits into 2 lanes and they often stick to the "left" side. I really feel for the lorry driver in this instance, absolutely no fault of his own. Mistakes are easily made, but to drive head on towards an artic in a single lane road without thinking something is a wee bit wrong is just ridiculous. Instant ban IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Roadhawk is what I've got \o/ It's a great bit of kit and that video is one of the reasons I use it - proof it wasn't my fault when the BMW cuts you up and crashes into you. Check out the G-force meter graph at the bottom of the clip, shows how hard it all hit, very sexy :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I notice it's says the truck driver wasn't to blame and was cleared but watching the part with the graph and his speed it clearly says he was doing 90kmph on a dual carriageway ...

The speed limit is 80kmph/50mph for trucks on a dual carriageway ..

I'm not making excuses for the prat driving the car but if he wasn't speeding he wouldn't of been there IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I notice it's says the truck driver wasn't to blame and was cleared but watching the part with the graph and his speed it clearly says he was doing 90kmph on a dual carriageway ...

The speed limit is 80kmph/50mph for trucks on a dual carriageway ..

I'm not making excuses for the prat driving the car but if he wasn't speeding he wouldn't of been there IMO

 

That speed limit depends on the weight, it's up to 60mph on a dual. Although I don't think there can be any argument that it was larger than a 7.5 tonner.

 

Speed wasn't a factor in this instance so it cannot be taken into consideration with this investigation, other than for use as a measurement of impact etc. The driver could get done for speeding but it would have no bearing on this particular case, of which he has been cleared of.

 

There are always ifs and buts with scenarios like this. If he was doing 90kph instead of 80 he would have avoided it too ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. You might also be interested in our Guidelines, Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.