Jump to content
The mkiv Supra Owners Club

UN backs action against Gaddafi


merckx

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i guess the oil is a factor, but you can guess what gadaffi will do to those who have opposed him if he got the chance, we cant stand back and watch that happen.and the US hasent deployed any jets yet just tomohawks and AWACs .the french are so far the major player with 20 jets on CAP .cant understand why the germans didnt vote though.perhaps they didnt want to be in the air with the RAF boys .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would guess the SAS are already on the ground , and Gadaffi would be a target as this would terminate things quickly !

Best he keeps moving as they will have laser designators !!

They would have learnt lessons from chasing Saddam around ,It don't pay to poke the Bear !!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

" Pressed about his assertion that Col Gaddafi was "not on a targeting list", Vice Adm Gortney said: "If he happens to be in a place, if he's inspecting a surface-to-air missile site, we don't have any idea that he's there or not, then yeah, but no, we're not targeting his residence this time."

 

Ha,ha, yeah right!!! bet his neighbours are not too happy right now!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They're probably also trying to prove a point. Even with our reduced capabilities, we're still able to defend our interests, anywhere. Hopefully Argentina are paying attention :)

 

If they take off from Gib, then they have more fuel on board over the target ie they can go around and have another go or select another target and still have fuel to get back to a base .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they take off from Gib, then they have more fuel on board over the target ie they can go around and have another go or select another target and still have fuel to get back to a base .

 

the Jets are now flying out of Italy, with tanker support from cyprus..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they take off from Gib, then they have more fuel on board over the target ie they can go around and have another go or select another target and still have fuel to get back to a base .

 

I agree with you, as do the MOD which is why the jets have now been moved. For a fast response, flying from a uk base is perfectly viable. Uk and us tankers operating in the area will allow for plenty of fuel in the airspace.

 

Just out of interest, the US tankers are capable of both methods of in flight refuelling. Are the UK ones?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with you, as do the MOD which is why the jets have now been moved. For a fast response, flying from a uk base is perfectly viable. Uk and us tankers operating in the area will allow for plenty of fuel in the airspace.

 

Just out of interest, the US tankers are capable of both methods of in flight refuelling. Are the UK ones?

 

take it your refering to boom and drouges methods?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. You might also be interested in our Guidelines, Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.