Jump to content
The mkiv Supra Owners Club

UN backs action against Gaddafi


merckx

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

We've stood idly by already

 

Only because of how much flak was given over how Iraq and Afghan were handled. In our gov's defence, they've been trying to get this rushed through as quickly as they could. The blame for how long it's taken sits firmly with the UN, not the UK.

 

I'd love to hear some constructive suggestions as to how situations like this should be handled, instead of the usual "Blah blah blah, oil, Blah, greed, Blah, we shouldn't get involved etc"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's incredibly, massively difficult for other countries to intervene in political unrest so I can understand their reluctance to get involved. Assuming you otherthrow the incumbent government, you create a power vacuum and genuine anarchy unless you replace it with something. So what do you replace it with? The American model of democracy? That's far from perfect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it is for the oil , it is for the greed , and everyone thinks we shouldnt get involved , what else is there ??

 

dan

 

If you genuinely have such little faith in humanity, I really pity you. Besides which, i'd love to see how wer're supposed to seize their oil assets with nothing but aeroplanes :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's incredibly, massively difficult for other countries to intervene in political unrest so I can understand their reluctance to get involved. Assuming you otherthrow the incumbent government, you create a power vacuum and genuine anarchy unless you replace it with something. So what do you replace it with? The American model of democracy? That's far from perfect.

 

I'm not even going to say 'at least the American government doesn't kill its own people'. I know exactly what i'd be in for :D

 

Seriously though, the Libyan people have asked for assistance. We have a responsibility to assist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you genuinely have such little faith in humanity, I really pity you. Besides which, i'd love to see how wer're supposed to seize their oil assets with nothing but aeroplanes :rolleyes:

 

From Tutsi killing Hutus, to serbs/croats , Sudan to south america , there is a history of sitting back and doing nothing ... why would you have faith in humanity, unless its oil driven humanity it dont count , Despots cover the globe and are tolerated even made friends ...

You can bet there is already a no fly zone around the oil wells!!

Ive seen too much to rely on humanity

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you genuinely have such little faith in humanity, I really pity you. Besides which, i'd love to see how wer're supposed to seize their oil assets with nothing but aeroplanes :rolleyes:

 

Uh-huh. Nothing to do with oil at all.

 

That's why the UN have been straight in and sorted out Mugabe and the atrocities which he has performed - oh no, wait - they haven't.

He hasn't got any natural resources, has he.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you genuinely have such little faith in humanity, I really pity you. Besides which, i'd love to see how wer're supposed to seize their oil assets with nothing but aeroplanes :rolleyes:

 

no need to pity me , sad thing is there are already some of our troops there (not sure on numbers) , this is where it will all start only time time will tell but im pretty sure oil is high on there agenda, planes is probably because they realised they cant win wars on the ground ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I the only one who thinks these tribal regions are best managed by a dictator for overall stability? We fiddled about in Iraq and from a country where one might holiday with the family it has gone to a dangerous, Godforsaken hole with the factions Saddam successfully,if ruthlessly kept apart, back at one another's throats. People shout the "O" word in response to why we meddle, I shout the "I" word, my personal view is Israel, with all her global influence, fears these places, and wants control by proxy. The oil is a nice addendum, but given the incumbent people can't use it all themselves, they are surely happy to sell it? I see little change in oil price hikes, now we have taken Iraq, for example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I the only one who thinks these tribal regions are best managed by a dictator for overall stability? - You have obviously never been to the sharp end and seen what this means to everyday people on a daily basis -

"Incumbents" all over the world have surplus , from cotton ,to bananas,copper, and tobacco , Who do you think controls all this ? sets prices ? owns the companies ,and bungs the despots in charge?

I was working in Africa during one of the worst droughts, the Maize corn crops were all dead ,and yet the tobacco fields were beautifully green and watered ,Im sure the locals would have been happier to eat ,rather than sell the cash crop , British American Tobacco werent too bothered , still had G and T at the golf club , with its beautiful greens

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oil probably is part of it, but I refuse to believe that is main reason why we're going. Isn't protecting our own interests important too? I'm sure everyone would be outraged if the price of oil increased exponentially.

 

Once again though, I'd like to hear how these situations should be dealt with?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uh-huh. Nothing to do with oil at all.

 

That's why the UN have been straight in and sorted out Mugabe and the atrocities which he has performed - oh no, wait - they haven't.

He hasn't got any natural resources, has he.

 

Except for probably the largest known diamond deposits in the world. Also, a no fly zone would do little good, it would involve sending in the troops. There's plenty of others higher up the pecking order for that. How long do you think the west will tolerate Iran directly funding int. terrorism?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Erm - our companies (Rio Tinto?) already own a cr*p load of the Zimbabwean diamond mines. That's the difference.

 

Don't want to stir up trouble there if it puts that interest at risk "unnecessarily" (what's a little bit of human rights amongst friends, heh?).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. You might also be interested in our Guidelines, Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.