Purity14 Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 Photoeshop? Very good. !! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Wilson Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 There are laws against that! Not in the outbacks of Shropshire there aren't Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lbm Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 Very good. !! I'm considering merging this thread with Scot M's ranty one earlier. Thoughts? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Wilson Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 >In before beast-i-ality. LOL, for a Scouser you are OK. The God fearing Scouser bit leaves me a bit perplexed though, you aren't a native, surely? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Wilson Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 Wouldnt be seen dead with a hoofed woman, who knows what type of test tube she grew out from. Number 666 in the rack? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Wilson Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 Photoeshop? You are wasted in here. Sadly, too often, take more water with it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Purity14 Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 I dont have a Scouce accent, I only spend 3 or 4 nights a week there. If you pretend I have a strong southern american accent when reading my posts, it works quite well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 You could put your c*ck where the toe should be. I still would Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lbm Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 You are wasted in here. Sadly, too often, take more water with it Right then, I'll have to water down my water. It's a worry. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Wilson Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 Right then, I'll have to water down my water. It's a worry. Drink in Shropshire, watering everything is a way of life. Getting drunk is an expensive challenge Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morpheus Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 Drink in Shropshire, watering everything is a way of life. Getting drunk is an expensive challenge Speaking of which, anyone have a MKIV '93 NA front window washer motor or both f/r or a whole washer tank unit? How much do they retail new? Haven't asked yet as front motor is all that's busted. Top 'broke' off. Searched it and someone said that you might have one Chris? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Wilson Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 Sorry, nothing to offer. Maybe you can adapt a scrap yard motor? Volvo ones look similar, but haven't tried one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian C Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 Wouldnt be seen dead with a hoofed woman, who knows what type of test tube she grew out from. Not a fan of intelligent design, then? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morpheus Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 Sorry, nothing to offer. Maybe you can adapt a scrap yard motor? Volvo ones look similar, but haven't tried one. Ok, Cheers. I've found MKIII ones new on ebay but not sure of fitment. Never had an issue with my MKIII washers so wouldn't know and probably wouldn't remember anyway but bound to be the same exact motors. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dr_jekyll Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 well i read the whole lot from start ti here,.... weird ass thread , from crazy trolls to hoof fotted models. I NEED A DRINK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stinboy Posted September 22, 2010 Share Posted September 22, 2010 Been reading this thread inbetween watching come dine with me on 4 on demand. Two and a half hours of my life i can never get back. Although that mad bird from East London was sweet i thought Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morpheus Posted September 22, 2010 Share Posted September 22, 2010 Not a fan of intelligent design, then? Sorry for another long post guys but hey Ian, what's your view on how this all 'came about' so to speak? I don't mean Clever Trevor's antics. That's an even deeper mystery unless it really was you! I don't think so somehow though. My brother thinks that it's all just a 'random accident', but the laws of physics prettymuch preclude random events or gravity wouldn't even exist. Nothing so coherent would or could. Even chaos has to be based on cause and effect at some level. At what point did someone decide that the laws of physics would limit the amount of energy in the Cosmos and doom us all to live in a closed loop? That can only happen if this were a part of the whole and not the whole. Therefore, there is much more to it than meets the eye, as theoretically atleast, the energy source must be infinite. If not, why does there have to be a limit to it? Because we can't imagine or accept infinity as a concept? Yet again, I digress. I visualise chaos like Brownian motion or how a gas behaves; seemingly random and utterly chaotic from our perspective but simply the collision of countless tiny molecules or particles, the properties of which, if they were known, would make the entire Universe predictable into infinity but for one thing: the organising principle or consciousness that bends and shapes what we laughably call 'solid' matter. This is what gives atoms their nudge, I reckon, so that they collide non-randomly toward order. Gravity, if you like. The Matrix, magnetic fields, the mind of God, even. Either way, that which decides, guides and then collides and ultimately, provides. To say that God doesn't exist is like saying that the sum total of all that is, actually isn't, since that's what 'God' by definition, must be for it to be of any authority, for want of a much better word. Perhaps 'objectivity' or 'complete awareness of itself'. It must be everything, (including that which it is not). I guess that your reasoning is that God is a similar creature to us and can't exist because 'he' wouldn't allow such suffering etc. being 100% good and all. People believe the bit that says that He made us in His own image and then use this as the excuse to deny His existence because of what we think that 'He' would be like. Fascinating cognitive dissonance. Talk about a selective memory! That's what most people get hung up on; some childhood Biblical Fairy Tale. Of course God doesn't exist if 'He' is supposed to intervene everytime we 'wrong' eachother, as clearly He doesn't give a Monkey's unless He's keeping score for Judgement Day to keep Himself amused. What sort of sadistic megalomaniac would do that? Why would a God worthy of the name damn His own children to Hell for all eternity? Malice? If so, I'll keep looking, thanks, not that I'm looking to worship anything or anyone. What God would demand to be worshipped? Would God need defending also? Yet people kill to 'honour' 'His' name. Cannot God take care of Him/itself? We insult God or Allah by assuming that He needs our help! So, having established that this storybook definition of God is hopelessly limited, absurd and invalid, we have to re-define what God is, since some form of intelligence had to organise this whole 'reality' of ours and they obviously didn't intend for it to be without purpose or pleasure, (see photos below, trotters or hoofs, whichever turn you on the most guys!). You can argue that it's all just logical progression, of course. The only way that it could have been and I'd agree. There's a mechanistic and predictable environment. It's the organic forms of matter that fascinate me the most, so called because they are organised beyond the norm, of course. We call them 'alive' or infused with an energy of a higher order. Intelligent, even. We call ourselves intelligent and yet deny our Creator this privilege, whatever form or formlessness it takes. Everywhere yet nowhere, or now here. Everywhere yet now here, i.e. all things simultaneously yet able to observe from a single relative perspective, that which it is. That's our job, by the way! Are you a fan of intelligent design Ian, as I'd like to find something upon which we can both agree for once? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian C Posted September 22, 2010 Share Posted September 22, 2010 You just wasted a lot of typing. I don't actually read your stuff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RCK10 Posted September 22, 2010 Share Posted September 22, 2010 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stinboy Posted September 22, 2010 Share Posted September 22, 2010 Sorry for another long post guys but hey Ian, what's your view on how this all 'came about' so to speak? I don't mean Clever Trevor's antics. That's an even deeper mystery unless it really was you! I don't think so somehow though. My brother thinks that it's all just a 'random accident', but the laws of physics prettymuch preclude random events or gravity wouldn't even exist. Nothing so coherent would or could. Even chaos has to be based on cause and effect at some level. At what point did someone decide that the laws of physics would limit the amount of energy in the Cosmos and doom us all to live in a closed loop? That can only happen if this were a part of the whole and not the whole. Therefore, there is much more to it than meets the eye, as theoretically atleast, the energy source must be infinite. If not, why does there have to be a limit to it? Because we can't imagine or accept infinity as a concept? Yet again, I digress. I visualise chaos like Brownian motion or how a gas behaves; seemingly random and utterly chaotic from our perspective but simply the collision of countless tiny molecules or particles, the properties of which, if they were known, would make the entire Universe predictable into infinity but for one thing: the organising principle or consciousness that bends and shapes what we laughably call 'solid' matter. This is what gives atoms their nudge, I reckon, so that they collide non-randomly toward order. Gravity, if you like. The Matrix, magnetic fields, the mind of God, even. Either way, that which decides, guides and then collides and ultimately, provides. To say that God doesn't exist is like saying that the sum total of all that is, actually isn't, since that's what 'God' by definition, must be for it to be of any authority, for want of a much better word. Perhaps 'objectivity' or 'complete awareness of itself'. It must be everything, (including that which it is not). I guess that your reasoning is that God is a similar creature to us and can't exist because 'he' wouldn't allow such suffering etc. being 100% good and all. People believe the bit that says that He made us in His own image and then use this as the excuse to deny His existence because of what we think that 'He' would be like. Fascinating cognitive dissonance. Talk about a selective memory! That's what most people get hung up on; some childhood Biblical Fairy Tale. Of course God doesn't exist if 'He' is supposed to intervene everytime we 'wrong' eachother, as clearly He doesn't give a Monkey's unless He's keeping score for Judgement Day to keep Himself amused. What sort of sadistic megalomaniac would do that? Why would a God worthy of the name damn His own children to Hell for all eternity? Malice? If so, I'll keep looking, thanks, not that I'm looking to worship anything or anyone. What God would demand to be worshipped? Would God need defending also? Yet people kill to 'honour' 'His' name. Cannot God take care of Him/itself? We insult God or Allah by assuming that He needs our help! So, having established that this storybook definition of God is hopelessly limited, absurd and invalid, we have to re-define what God is, since some form of intelligence had to organise this whole 'reality' of ours and they obviously didn't intend for it to be without purpose or pleasure, (see photos below, trotters or hoofs, whichever turn you on the most guys!). You can argue that it's all just logical progression, of course. The only way that it could have been and I'd agree. There's a mechanistic and predictable environment. It's the organic forms of matter that fascinate me the most, so called because they are organised beyond the norm, of course. We call them 'alive' or infused with an energy of a higher order. Intelligent, even. We call ourselves intelligent and yet deny our Creator this privilege, whatever form or formlessness it takes. Everywhere yet nowhere, or now here. Everywhere yet now here, i.e. all things simultaneously yet able to observe from a single relative perspective, that which it is. That's our job, by the way! Are you a fan of intelligent design Ian, as I'd like to find something upon which we can both agree for once? Oh ffs... Stop taking yourself so seriously. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morpheus Posted September 22, 2010 Share Posted September 22, 2010 You just wasted a lot of typing. I don't actually read your stuff. No change there then! You'd do well to. I'm not the one with the bright pink & yellow sign, asking for help. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morpheus Posted September 22, 2010 Share Posted September 22, 2010 Oh ffs... Stop taking yourself so seriously. You already said that you'd wasted over two hours reading this crap so why punish yourself further by reading any further? There, changed my user title. Happy now? What did Rene Descartes ever do for us anyway? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stinboy Posted September 22, 2010 Share Posted September 22, 2010 No change there then! You'd do well to. QUOTE] Nah not really. I don't want to cause offence but judging by the bullishness of your posts on this matter I'm sure you're unlikely to do so. I'll keep it short but, possibly, not sweet. You sound like a man who has to prove how clever he never had the chance to be. Soundbites and references don't impress me at all. Very few would be I reckon. Rhetoric? Keep it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stinboy Posted September 22, 2010 Share Posted September 22, 2010 And stop getting so upset. There are more than enough, to fight and oppose, why waste good time fighting the people you love............. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stinboy Posted September 22, 2010 Share Posted September 22, 2010 You already said that you'd wasted over two hours reading this crap so why punish yourself further by reading any further? There, changed my user title. Happy now? What did Rene Descartes ever do for us anyway? Good point - what did Morrissey ever do for us either?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.