wesmi01 Posted December 18, 2002 Share Posted December 18, 2002 Just woundering how many high powered supras are out there!!!! Anyone who is not stock basically. Your BHP figures or 1/4 of a mile times and speeds would be great!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Whiffin Posted December 18, 2002 Share Posted December 18, 2002 Well here's mine, I've attached a rolling road print out as well. 428 at the wheels which is around 520ish and 532lbft torque, still needs a bit of fine tuning though to get some more bhp. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Martin F Posted December 18, 2002 Share Posted December 18, 2002 More than stock http://www.indidist.co.uk/images/images/martinf5.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Harwood Posted December 18, 2002 Share Posted December 18, 2002 Can't be as flash as the above two cause I've not got a scanner to hand, but my RR results came out at 296.9 rwhp, which equates to approx 395 bhp flywheel. Lowest on here so far Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragonball Posted December 18, 2002 Share Posted December 18, 2002 Guys - Quick question if my Blitz SBC-ID is showing a chassis BHP of 280 (and I know that there is large error factor depending on weight etc etc) What does this figure relate to? Cheers Paul:cool: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B3any Posted December 18, 2002 Share Posted December 18, 2002 Originally posted by Paul Whiffin Well here's mine, I've attached a rolling road print out as well. 428 at the wheels which is around 520ish and 532lbft torque, still needs a bit of fine tuning though to get some more bhp. That is a beautifully smooth, pwer curve thats how it should be done, Runs for wallet........... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaz Walker Posted December 18, 2002 Share Posted December 18, 2002 Originally posted by Paul E Quick question if my Blitz SBC-ID is showing a chassis BHP of 280 (and I know that there is large error factor depending on weight etc etc) What does this figure relate to? About 2 and a half small ponies... Gaz. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex Posted December 18, 2002 Share Posted December 18, 2002 Originally posted by Paul E Guys - Quick question if my Blitz SBC-ID is showing a chassis BHP of 280 (and I know that there is large error factor depending on weight etc etc) What does this figure relate to? Cheers Paul:cool: It means you should have done it in a lower gear! I think its RWHP but until I get on the rollers in the new year I won't be able to confirm it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nic Posted December 19, 2002 Share Posted December 19, 2002 Here's mine again:D I found out from the garage why mine looks high for stock turbos, the lower line on the graph is the rwhp (about 360hp) the top line is the power at the crank estimated by the dyno. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nic Posted December 19, 2002 Share Posted December 19, 2002 and now with the attachment:stupid: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MONKEYmark Posted December 19, 2002 Share Posted December 19, 2002 would love to know what power i have.will get water injection then get fueling checked then put it on rollers to see. i would have a guestimate of 360-380 but dont know. my best 1/4 time has been Reaction = 0.832 60 Foot = 2.291 1/8 ET = 8.944 1/8 MPH = 85.440 1/4 ET = 13.447 (i think its a crap time) 1/4 MPH = 111.270 @ nic that graph looks amazing. we starting to see a few big power supras on this site. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Terry S Posted December 19, 2002 Share Posted December 19, 2002 609bhp & 565 ft/lbs @ 19psi 690bhp + & 600ft/lbs+@ 25 psi with ignition missfire Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Terry S Posted December 19, 2002 Share Posted December 19, 2002 I have 1 engine dyno map ( 609 @ 18.4 psi) here that has been scanned through a fax machine so the quality is poor, & it needs turning around otherwise you'll get neck ache. Any of you IT techies want to turn it around so people can view it let me know & I'll mail it over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharpie Posted December 19, 2002 Share Posted December 19, 2002 Originally posted by Terry S I have 1 engine dyno map ( 609 @ 18.4 psi) here that has been scanned through a fax machine so the quality is poor, & it needs turning around otherwise you'll get neck ache. Any of you IT techies want to turn it around so people can view it let me know & I'll mail it over. For Terry: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Terry S Posted December 19, 2002 Share Posted December 19, 2002 Many thanks Peter. Enjoy;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B3any Posted December 19, 2002 Share Posted December 19, 2002 Thats quick!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cashpoint Posted December 19, 2002 Share Posted December 19, 2002 Are you serious in that you loss around 100bhp through the transmission:eek: . My current car is 4x4 and that only loses 70hp through the transmission but it is man not an auto box. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Terry S Posted December 19, 2002 Share Posted December 19, 2002 It's all relative to the amount of power the car produces. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Whiffin Posted December 19, 2002 Share Posted December 19, 2002 What type of fuel was that on Terrence? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragonball Posted December 19, 2002 Share Posted December 19, 2002 Originally posted by Paul Whiffin What type of fuel was that on Terrence? Liquid Oxygen / hydrogen mix:p Nice result - would scare the living bejabbers outs me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Terry S Posted December 19, 2002 Share Posted December 19, 2002 Paul it was the 100 MON stuff, unleaded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nic Posted December 19, 2002 Share Posted December 19, 2002 Very impressive figures Terry, what turbo & fuel system are you running? Mine's starting to feel normal again now I've got use to the power, what numbers do you recon the stage 4's will add over my current set up? cheers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Whiffin Posted December 19, 2002 Share Posted December 19, 2002 Whats that in RON about 105? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Terry S Posted December 19, 2002 Share Posted December 19, 2002 106. Do you want me to e-mail you the link?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Terry S Posted December 19, 2002 Share Posted December 19, 2002 Originally posted by Nic Very impressive figures Terry, what turbo & fuel system are you running? Mine's starting to feel normal again now I've got use to the power, what numbers do you recon the stage 4's will add over my current set up? cheers Ah c'mon Nic, can't I have some secrets;) It runs 850cc's if that helps. I think the stage 4's will be awesome, but as such are untested yet. It won't be long, but if anymore are done these are the ulitimate it terms of size & flowwith the current wheel technology. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now