Dale B Posted May 27, 2005 Share Posted May 27, 2005 So What are we to do with the Atkins/Williams family? You know - the one that's had more media exposure than that bloody Crazy Frog advert in the past few days. That we have to call them the Atkins/Williams family should give you a clue. The matriarch - single mother Julie Atkins, 38 - is a product of our family-free society. She has three daughters, some of whom appear to be called Williams, presumably in honour of a long-departed "father". And now we really get into it. Eldest daughter Natasha got pregnant at 16 and gave birth to a daughter called Amani. (The fact that she can't even spell "Armani" is a matter for the education authorities in Derby, where the family lives. ) The father of Amani does not appear to be on the scene. Described as a 38-year-old Asian gambler who still lives with his mum and dad, he must be fervently hoping that his parents aren't in the habit of watching television or reading newspapers. One toss of the dice too far, eh pal? We now turn to daughter number two, a 15-year-old called Jade, who gave birth to a daughter called Lita last December. (Why the child is named after a Bristol City striker is neither here nor there. The father is a local teenager who appears to have conveniently forgotten the one-night stand that resulted in his offspring. ) If this wasn't enough, may I introduce Atkins/Williams daughter number three? Step forward Jemma, pregnant at 12 and mother of 14-month-old T-Jay. A boy, I think. (Bear with me on these names. At least the kid isn't called Matalan or Lidl. Yet.) Now it doesn't take a genius to work out that young Jemma must have been having sex at the age of 11. What is surprising is that her mother apparently knew of the situation and possibly even condoned it, allowing her child to cavort with her "boyfriend" in the next-door bedroom. The mind truly boggles. When I was 11, I was still collecting stamps and had only just started smoking. The thought of playing Doctors and Nurses with members of the opposite sex would have been quite outrageous. Apart from the odd dalliance with Helen Swinbank in her Wendy House, of course. The Atkins/Williams family came to national attention after complaining locally about the awful conditions they have to live in. Their three-bedroomed council house (and didn't you just know that was coming) is apparently too small for this multiplying brood and they would like somewhere bigger, if you don't mind. For the record, this State-funded baby factory brings in around £31,000 a year in benefits, paid for by you and me. They pay no rent or council tax. They have a big telly and a DVD player. And a freezer full of Findus Crispy Pancakes. And free lottery tickets every Saturday. So who do we blame for this situation? Who do we take to task for the fact that an 11-year-old girl is having sex with the connivance of her own mother? Well not the feckless Ms Atkins for a start. She blames the schools and the Government. According to her, none of her children received sufficient sex education at school and therefore fell foul of what they thought was innocent horseplay. What rubbish. Innocent horseplay at the age of 11 is playing conkers and tag in the playground. Not re-enacting porn films with a boy just out of long trousers while your mother sleeps in the next bedroom. As a parent, I feel sick to even think about it. Frankly, I'd call the police. The woman is an accomplice to a clear-cut case of statutory rape. And anyway, the fact that her eldest daughter, Natasha, managed to sleep her way through two miscarriages and an abortion before producing a child gives lie to that assertion. Hadn't the stupid girl worked out by then what was causing the morning sickness and the craving for coal? But however horrific these local difficulties might be, we have to accept that for many children, shelling out illegitimate kids like a Birds Eye combine harvester is simply a career move. They have no ambition, no plans for the life ahead. A quick bunk-up with a passing hoodie and Hey Presto! They're someone, they're a mother. And with that status come the rewards. Benefits sufficient enough to provide a steady supply of cheap white cider, packets of Lambert & Butler and some Elizabeth Duke bling. Food for the cuckoos in the nest, even if it does only amount to microwave pizzas and oven chips. And perhaps even their own council flats, where they can entertain further passing scrotes. Then come the ASBOs, the additional multi-coloured kids, the elasticated waistbands, the tattoos and, eventually, the disability benefits from obesity and chronic smoking. With a bit of luck, the ever-swelling brood will by then be asthmatic, reaping further rewards. And special needs, of course. Which means a free car. It's like Bingo, only in real life. And you have to say, as a career plan it beats working your balls off for 50 years only to find out that your pension has been swallowed up by the demands of the welfare state. And Gordon Brown. In other countries, such teenage fecundity would be encouraged. After all, we need more citizens coming into the workforce to help look after the swelling ranks of the old. There is only one problem with that theory. In all likelihood, the offspring of the likes of Natasha, Jade and Jemma will merely continue the cycle of state-funded leeching. They won't contribute to society. They'll just continue to take, setting up baby factories and feral hoodie gangs of their own. There is only one way to tackle this problem. Before any woman under the age of 25 is allowed to have a child, she must first obtain a Baby Licence. She will only be able to do this by first proving that she has the basic intelligence, the financial means, and the secure family structure that will allow her to bring up the child properly. Any tracksuit-wearing trollop who "falls pregnant" whilst not in possession of a licence will face a compulsory termination. End of story. (And don't pull that face at me, Ms Middle Class Lefty. It suited you to have your potential sprog aborted when promotion beckoned. All we're doing is making the decision for those incapable of reasoning for themselves.) And do you know the saddest aspect of this story? I've had to abandon this column's Scrote of the Year Contest. Once Julie Atkins appeared on the scene, there was only one winner. I AM hesitant to jump upon the bandwagon of BBC complaints, but could I possibly have my old television weather graphics back? As you may have noticed, the venerated Baghdad Broadcasting Corporation has dumped the old magnetic weather symbols and now inflicts upon us a nauseating, virtual-reality, rollercoaster ride around Britain instead. Listen, you lentil-eating, leather-elbowed Lefties. This is a sea-faring nation. We exported goods all around the world, we built railways across continents, we discovered the Spice Routes and we turned half of the globe pink. We beat the French at Trafalgar, we were nearly starved to death by Hitler's U-Boats and we needed the weather window in order to invade Normandy. We couldn't have done all this without meteorological information: the troughs, the anticyclones, the prevailing south-westerlies, and the Siberian winds in winter. I want my Atlantic weather system chart back and I want my isobars back, pronto. CAN YOU be cruel to a Dalek? Given that they're the Earth's biggest enemies, one wouldn't have thought so. Yet the British Board of Film Classification has decreed that the forthcoming DVD of the new Doctor Who series has to be given the classification "12", meaning that it can't be seen by new mothers from Derby. A spokesman for the board (no, really) says: "However cross one might be with a Dalek, being cruel to it is not the way to deal with the issue." I hesitate to ask which planet this spokesman might be from. And we should also note for the record that this series of Doctor Who is beautifully made, wonderfully shot, brilliantly original, superbly educational and, at times, very frightening indeed. That it should appear on the same television screen that brings me Celebrity Love Island is just another of life's mysteries. NATASHA, Jade and Jemma might be interested to learn that an investigation into the environmental-friendliness of nappies has deduced that disposables are no more harmful than the old terry towel rags that people of a certain age used to be clad in. This is a major blow to those members of the Turkey Army whose job is to convince new mothers that an evil-smelling bucket in the corner of the kitchen is a better option than a bumper packet of Huggies. Is it too much to expect that these advocates of nonsense, all of whom will be on £25,000 and free muesli, might now be sacked? Just a thought. The views of Mr Beelzebub are purely personal and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Editor or staff of this newspaper, of anyone who hasn't got an anti-bullying wristband (it was called a Chinese Burn in my day), of anyone who hasn't been overtaken by a policeman doing 159mph on the motorway, or of anyone who can't work out why the Minister for Women (responsible for equal pay) isn't actually getting paid for doing the job. I suppose she could always take in a bit of ironing to see her through Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRD3000GT Posted May 27, 2005 Share Posted May 27, 2005 Here Here.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael Posted May 27, 2005 Share Posted May 27, 2005 The Supraforums take on the story of the 3 s1ut sisters is interesting http://www.supraforums.com/forum/showthread.php?t=285918 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Prawn Posted May 27, 2005 Share Posted May 27, 2005 Who wrote this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilverMachine Posted May 27, 2005 Share Posted May 27, 2005 I bet you feel better now you've got that load off your chest Dale! Nice one. See you soon, Gaz P.S. I like your Japanesey racing style 'new look' Soop! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
attilauk Posted May 27, 2005 Share Posted May 27, 2005 that a column in my local paper called the devils advocate its brilliant Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SupraStar 3000 Posted May 27, 2005 Share Posted May 27, 2005 very funny but depressingly accurate Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tbourner Posted May 27, 2005 Share Posted May 27, 2005 I've been saying recently that our party (we started it a few months ago - there was a post somewhere with the policies on it) would instate compulsory abortions to under 16s who got pregnant anyway, that would be their punishment, and the bloke would get the normal 'eye for an eye' punishment whatever that would be decided to be in this case! I'm gonna send that to some people now and work something out!! Next election vote for us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted May 27, 2005 Share Posted May 27, 2005 I had to look this word up : fe·cun·di·ty Audio pronunciation of "fecundity" ( P ) Pronunciation Key (f-knd-t) n. 1. The quality or power of producing abundantly; fruitfulness or fertility. 2. Productive or creative power: fecundity of the mind. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoboblio Posted May 27, 2005 Share Posted May 27, 2005 Here here!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slick Posted May 27, 2005 Share Posted May 27, 2005 And people deny the countrys in a mess... in fact make that the whole world Scum, they should be rounded up and put into hard labour camps... that'd sort em out instead of leaching off the rest of us who actually work for what we've got Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dale B Posted May 27, 2005 Author Share Posted May 27, 2005 Who wrote this? A columnist called Mr Beelzebub , not sure which paper he works for Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoboblio Posted May 27, 2005 Share Posted May 27, 2005 As a quick addition to the above... I absolutely HATE the way people like this will look at someone driving a supra / porsche / ferrari etc and think (or say) "Rich c**t".... I work for a living thanks, and don't resort to petty vandalism or theft because I'm too lazy / stupid to make my own way in the world. Right, where's my medication? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted May 27, 2005 Share Posted May 27, 2005 "Rich c**t"...." Yeah - and your names not even Richard! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerotop Dave Posted May 27, 2005 Share Posted May 27, 2005 So What are we to do with the Atkins/Williams family? You know - the one that's had more media exposure than that bloody Crazy Frog advert in the past few days. Fine with me - much better that we talk about social issues than the frog! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amazing grace Posted May 27, 2005 Share Posted May 27, 2005 How any mother can allow even her 16yr old daughter get pregnant and not insist on helping her get rid of it or deal with it should be shot but then to allow her younger 14-15yr old do the same thing is unsurpassed idiocy!!!!!!! The 11yr old is plain disgusting i have an 11yr old daughter she is a child in no way should they be expected to kiss goodbye to their own childhood in order to raise a baby that they cannot possibly care properly for without help is quite honstly beyond me i am appaled in the deepest part of me how peoplecan be so low as to allow this to happen to their children she should not be allowed to keep her daughters, she obviously cant care for them properly and they in turn cannot care for the small ones who will probably grow up to do the same thing. This country will eventually be peopled by idiots at this rate!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Sorry but this really upset me in a big way!!!!!! Regards, Sheena Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobAndrews Posted May 27, 2005 Share Posted May 27, 2005 and atleast 2 of the daughters have different Dads, maybe all three (and none of them are the current partner of the mother), where are they now ? Please welcome the CSA fiasco into the fray... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tbourner Posted May 27, 2005 Share Posted May 27, 2005 Well put Sheena, Zoe has a 10 year old sister, she went out today to a fair in Portsmouth with a friend, her mum was saying that Zoe should go with her so she wouldn't have to cross the road on her own!!!! Girls just 1 year older getting pregnant!!!!! UN-FUCKING-BELIEVABLE!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobSheffield Posted May 28, 2005 Share Posted May 28, 2005 i saw this on my local news, i was astounded....was gonna post up about it, but was a little worried about 'Ms Middle Class Lefty' getting a face on and flaming me! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael parker Posted May 28, 2005 Share Posted May 28, 2005 Couldn't be bothered to read it, but heres what we should do with the frog..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.