Guest ugp Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 http://cars.uk.msn.com/features/photos.aspx?cp-documentid=153204809&page=9 Dont agree with the top speed shiz though.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kjgreen3 Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 Or the 0-60 time thought it was closer to 4.8 secs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveR Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 156mph can't be right, surely? I've had nothing done to the drivetrain and mine (BPU) will easily do more than that... Either way, top 10 isn't bad! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaz6002 Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 Never take anything you read on MSN car very seriously. It's right at the lowest end of motoring journalism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sams Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 I think someone needs to email msn cars and correct them on there information Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaz6002 Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 I think someone needs to email msn cars and correct them on there information There's no point bud. They appear on this site every month or so with a different list of cars featuring the Supra; the information is always wrong and very often quite disparaging. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soop Dogg Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 Or the 0-60 time thought it was closer to 4.8 secs Info at the time from Toyota claimed 4.9secs manual and 5.1secs auto. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sams Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 Where do they get the information from but a bonus it made to 8, I wonder where they would rate a big single set up to have supercars for a snack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian W Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 I'd rather have an Esprit or a Mercedes SL That said, obviously the Supra is a far better daily driver than either of those options (or any others within that top 10 really). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
merckx Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 I wonder where they would rate a big single set up to have supercars for a snack I wonder where they would rate a highly modified supercar to have single supra's for a snack? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miguel Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 "And falling one place to number 9...Toyota, with Supra" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j_jza80 Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 Odd that in a list of 'Top ten supercars', there's only one supercar (The Lotus) The rest are GTs, The Ferrari is a Pile of sh1te and i'd hardly consider any 911 available for under £10k to be a supercar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike_Mac Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 156mph can't be right, surely? I've had nothing done to the drivetrain and mine (BPU) will easily do more than that... I think they're talking about the UK spec being restricted to 155 mph, but then most German cars on the AutoBahn are exactly the same. In conclusion - more research needed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reeceu Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 doesnt a clio v6 being placed number 2 say it all... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abz Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 Never take anything you read on MSN car very seriously. It's right at the lowest end of motoring journalism. Yes... doesnt a clio v6 being placed number 2 say it all... ...and err Yes! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now