Guest Suprafly Posted February 28, 2010 Share Posted February 28, 2010 (edited) You're going to love this one..... Right had an opportunity to take part in a group rolling road day today at Motorscope Northallerton, and these results look so high it's rediculous but when I asked about the validity of these figures they claim them to be accurate. These claims seemed to check out as amongst 25 or so other cars they did included a stock E46 M3 which I know produces 343bhp and produced 340bhp on the day which seems about right, an EvoFQ300 known to be 350bhp which ran 365bhp, and the list goes on, so did they just f**k up on mine? I think so. If you look at Run 1 they have 342.1 wheels, 493.2 engine, 492.9 lbft, but Run 2 they have 343.3 wheels, 466.2 engine, 474.1 lbft and I dont think this adds up, the whp looks possible but the engine and torque are just too high even on the 2nd run where they are lower. The car is running stock twins (stock as far as I'm aware) at 1.2 bar max boost with full BPU as follows: HKS Superdragger HKS mushroom intake Whifbitz double decat 1.2 bar ring Warlbro fuel pump NGK Iridium plugs HKS FCD I have used Motorscope in the past with various other cars and have always been spot on. I was expecting to see a figure between 380 and 400bhp at the engine to be honest with these mods, so i think I'll be taking it to another dynometer soon. Edited February 28, 2010 by Suprafly typo (see edit history) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobSheffield Posted February 28, 2010 Share Posted February 28, 2010 Either in the wrong gear or using the wrong correction factor. Curve looks 'interesting' at lower revs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamieP Posted February 28, 2010 Share Posted February 28, 2010 At 5255rpm? good for the pub bragging, get your sig updated with the new power output:D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Suprafly Posted February 28, 2010 Share Posted February 28, 2010 Either in the wrong gear or using the wrong correction factor. Curve looks 'interesting' at lower revs It's an Auto. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homer Posted February 28, 2010 Share Posted February 28, 2010 It's an Auto. And there you have it. Numpty dyno operator yet again, it's simply impossible to make that sort of power without massive changes to the fueling & timing, unless it's running exotic fuel, NOS and very high boost. The torque line confirms it's a bad result. Did you pay for this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Suprafly Posted March 1, 2010 Share Posted March 1, 2010 (edited) Unfortunately yes, but it was a group booking so the cost was down to 36 quid, but while thats not exactly loads I'm still non the wiser about the cars power, and spent 36 quid plus fuel etc getting there too to be given a bunch of figures that may as well have been made up. The more I think about it the more it p*sses me off. Edited March 1, 2010 by Suprafly typo (see edit history) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.