Jump to content
The mkiv Supra Owners Club

Single Turbo


Guest suprasutty

Recommended Posts

Guest suprasutty

Anyone had any dealings with this company which is advertising on E**y item number 180462118707

 

I am thinking about putting this unit into my NA Auto, is it a good deal or am I better going TT. Don`t want to sell my Supra as I only paid £2500 for it last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have a search around the forum, you'll find the general consenus is buy a tt.

 

However have you looked into a TT transplant? Can be had for around 2500 and alot more reliable than the NA-T option.

 

If your set on keeping the car, i'd think about a TT conversion instead.

 

Even if you go the NA-T route you'll probably get used to it and crave more power. the TT engine is a better base for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TBH I wouldn't touch this engine with a barge pole. IMO you are best off looking for a low mile TT engine to transplant into your NA and work up from there. You are only getting 3 months parts only warranty on this engine, milage is unknown and at the end of the day it's an NA engine so further increase on the BHP is VERY limited.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest suprasutty

Same thoughts then as I had just wanted another opinion, does anyone know of anyone in the NE who would do a TT transplant anlong with the TT diff.

 

Cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed i wouldnt touch that particular engine, just leave it.

 

at the end of the day it's an NA engine so further increase on the BHP is VERY limited.

 

Thats just a load of bollocks :blink:

In NA form it is limited but in turbo form its just as capable as a TT block to make power if your know what your doing.

Edited by Kirk (see edit history)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's NA-T's running more power than that.

 

Sorry my mistake. I always thought that NA engines in standard form with a turbo dropped on weren't up to making big power without spending silly amounts of money, so not cost affective. As I said earlier my mistake.

Edited by Frank Bullitt
Spelling (see edit history)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. You might also be interested in our Guidelines, Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.