70-year gag on Kelly death evidence

[Supra Size Me]

This may or may not interest some of you.....

 

http://latestnews.virginmedia.com/news/uk/2010/01/24/70_year_gag_on_kelly_death_evidence

 

 

Dr Powers asked: "Supposedly all evidence relevant to the cause of death has been heard in public at the time of Lord Hutton's inquiry. If these secret reports support the suicide finding, what could they contain that could be so sensitive?"

 

If our government doesn't want to fuel the fire for the conspiracy theorists out there why do they insist on pouring kerosene on it and flicking matches at the bugger ?

[The Raven]

LOL

 

Someone knows some damming truths, he goes for a walk, kills himself for little reason.

 

Hang on,

 

Lady di goes to marry a muslim, goes for a ride in a car, is rammed off the road. No video in the tunnel, no one saw anything. And the butler cant remember anything.

 

Nothing to see here i guess.

[marbleapple]

There are still records from WW2 and the cold war held for security reasons. People who know more about these than us deem them worth covering up. Why do we feel we need to know more and always challenge that persons decision? Even if she was killed by alien's from Mars how would that have any effect on the normal person's life? - it wouldn't so why does it matter that records won't be released.

[CJ]

There are still records from WW2 and the cold war held for security reasons. People who know more about these than us deem them worth covering up. Why do we feel we need to know more and always challenge that persons decision? Even if she was killed by alien's from Mars how would that have any effect on the normal person's life? - it wouldn't so why does it matter that records won't be released.

 

I disagree with this - and certainly on the part of David Kelly.

 

This was a man who was a central figure in the discussions on Iraq and WOMD. He goes out for a walk and commits suicide which in itself is not an issue but it becomes one when there is a blanket coverage of evidence re his death.

 

If, as the OP has already quoted) there was nothing of significance other than a "normal" suicide, then why not publish? What are the powers that be trying to hide?

 

I for one to not like this type of governance whereby we are kept in the dark.

[sdistc]

I disagree with this - and certainly on the part of David Kelly.

 

This was a man who was a central figure in the discussions on Iraq and WOMD. He goes out for a walk and commits suicide which in itself is not an issue but it becomes one when there is a blanket coverage of evidence re his death.

 

If, as the OP has already quoted) there was nothing of significance other than a "normal" suicide, then why not publish? What are the powers that be trying to hide?

 

I for one to not like this type of governance whereby we are kept in the dark.

 

Completely agreed. All governments seem to think that we only have the intellectual and moral/ethical grasp of children, and therefore cannot possibly deal with the whole truth of their decision making process. What it *REALLY* means is that they have carte blanche to hide dirty little deals with unsavoury people, extremely unethical conduct (political assassination, war crimes etc) and plain old stupidity / mistakes without us ever knowing and making them accountable.