Jump to content
The mkiv Supra Owners Club

Chrysler 300c


Matt H

Recommended Posts

Same price could get you an equivalent GS300. That way you could potentially share 2JZ servicing bits, or leverage some of your existing relationships with suppliers?

 

Chrysler certainly looks different, tho, if you're after a change!

 

My old man used to have a Nissan 300C (with the VG30 engine) back in the 80's. That was a funny car!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Go and sit in a 5 series then sit in one of these tacky plastic things.

They are horrid inside.

Always thought they looked quite pimp from the outside and hated them after sitting in one.

Would never waste my hard earned on a Chrysler.

 

You can get a nice Lexus ls430, gs300 or new shape 5 series for that money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, a runaround for 12k :p

 

Personally I think 300C has a real road presence but I am always in doubt of the build quality of yank cars.

 

Like others have said, for that money you can get a GS300 which is more practical and most probably outperform the 300C.

 

Or I will stretch that budget a little bit more (circa 2-3k grand) and get this beast :

 

http://www.pistonheads.co.uk/sales/1309961.htm

 

5 litres of v10 power.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You and Jamesy W have lots in common. Need lots of fake gold to drive about in anything like that IMO. A guy I know, I won't name him, has a chrysler similar in looks to the Bentley (not up on my chrysler or Bentley models) and when talking about it he calls it a Bentley.

 

It's like footballers wives, only cheaper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chrysler have historically kept tech info on their cars close to their chest, so DIY / none franchised garage repairs may be problematic. Chrysler build quality is no where near the average Japanese or decent European built car, stuff like heater controls and gizmos often go pop. The V6 3.5 twin SOHC engine Chrylsler make is superb. Not had any hands on on the V8, it looks complex, ancillary wise. Styling wise it's obviously personal taste, a friend describes them as a Nigerian's car, which I couldn't really argue with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You and Jamesy W have lots in common. Need lots of fake gold to drive about in anything like that IMO. A guy I know, I won't name him, has a chrysler similar in looks to the Bentley (not up on my chrysler or Bentley models) and when talking about it he calls it a Bentley.

 

It's like footballers wives, only cheaper.

 

You have lots in common with Sloth from the Goonies.

 

There's a reason they appear good value for money. Awful car.

 

In what way?

 

Not a bad car for the money. Badly built but based on an e class. You will look like a dick in it though....

 

I've only read that they are built quite well.

 

I'm always mistaking them for a Bentley! Buy the diesel if it's just for a run-araound, the V8 is brilliant but do you want the fuel bill?

 

Going on autotrader, there are a few for sale that are badged as bentleys :rolleyes:

 

It would be the 3.0l d if anything.

 

Chrysler have historically kept tech info on their cars close to their chest, so DIY / none franchised garage repairs may be problematic. Chrysler build quality is no where near the average Japanese or decent European built car, stuff like heater controls and gizmos often go pop. The V6 3.5 twin SOHC engine Chrylsler make is superb. Not had any hands on on the V8, it looks complex, ancillary wise. Styling wise it's obviously personal taste, a friend describes them as a Nigerian's car, which I couldn't really argue with.

 

Thanks for the info Chris :thumbs:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks, handling, build quality, image portrayal... I could go on

 

Well bar looks, which are objectional, I've only read positive things about the handling and build. It seems like the 300 is to the merc, as the jag x-type is to the mondeo.

 

I agree that it's a rather pompous car, but it's so cheap!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well bar looks, which are objectional, I've only read positive things about the handling and build. It seems like the 300 is to the merc, as the jag x-type is to the mondeo.

 

I agree that it's a rather pompous car, but it's so cheap!

 

 

I think you meant to say subjective, not objectional (isn't it objectionable anyway...), the latter is more accurate. The fact it's pompous and cheap is the reason it's more a wanna be drug dealer's car than a gentleman's car.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. You might also be interested in our Guidelines, Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.