Jump to content
The mkiv Supra Owners Club

Google Michelle Obama


Bobbeh

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
I doubt that. You'd be getting paid way too much to care about something so trivial.

 

Not really trivial though is it. It basically says the most searched item on the net about the first lady was that racist picture.

 

I'd say that says a ton about the world we live in and I am quite concerned, particularly being from African origin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/8377922.stm

 

Only took google best part of 2 weeks to remove the image. :rolleyes:

 

I'd be ashamed if I was a google employee.

 

They haven't removed it have they? How can they remove a search result? What's the point in a search if stuff can't be found?

Why can't we remove the idiots who take offence to this kind of thing? Photoshop my face onto a snowman I'm sure I won't care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They haven't removed it have they? How can they remove a search result? What's the point in a search if stuff can't be found?

Why can't we remove the idiots who take offence to this kind of thing? Photoshop my face onto a snowman I'm sure I won't care.

 

Yeh its gone now.

 

I don't see the need to totally remove it per se. But if such an image appears at the top of the rank and it will be blantantly be politically incorrect, racist etc. etc., I see no harm in doctoring the results of at least the first page. I'd have thought that'd be common sense.

 

lol, yes but with all due respect you aren't the first lady of the USA are you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really trivial though is it. It basically says the most searched item on the net about the first lady was that racist picture.

 

I'd say that says a ton about the world we live in and I am quite concerned, particularly being from African origin.

 

I think it's trivial, obviously someone at Google didn't put the image there. It's a computer-controlled function leading to an unfortunate coincidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We'll have to agree to disagree mr gaz. Its interesting how split reacions are on bbc news as well. I'd have thought most would clearly find it disturbing blah blah and agree it should be removed.

 

Whilst v.few argue its not offensive and I agree that its not google's job to police its searching. In an instance like this it must take some action, especially when its brought to their attention.

 

Had it not made world news today (no idea why it took 2 weeks to do so), they'd have left it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd have laughed, but I am old school and not yet PC sanitised thoroughly. Hell, I'd like them to bring back `Til death us do part", just to hear the kerfuffle from the indignant left who seem to honestly believe the man on the Clapham omnibus has really become so PC as not to laugh at it. Perhaps Clapham isn't so good a choice these days, in hindsight.... ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my mistake it was the old pg tips advert.

 

it was just a touch on a previous comment saying poloticians should be exept being made into comidy caricatures. to witch i was trying to say, that if spitting image ( a programe that makes poloticians into comedy items ) was to use the family from the old pg tips adverts for (those who remember it) as a comidy interpiration of the obama family may cause controvercy and offence .

 

my mistaking pg tips with teltly tea may have caused some advers confusion, for this i can only offer my deepest apologies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my mistake it was the old pg tips advert.

 

it was just a touch on a previous comment saying poloticians should be ready to be mad into comidy caricatures. to witch i was trying to say, that if spitting image ( a programe that makes poloticians into comedy items ) was to use the family from the old pg tips adverts for (those who remember it) i dont belive it would go down well with the public.

 

my mistaking pg tips with teltly tea may have caused some advers confusion, for this i can only offer my deepest apologies.

 

:wtf: :rlol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. You might also be interested in our Guidelines, Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.