Si_s Supe Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 I am selling my Civic SiR soon and am coming over to the dark side and buying the car I've ALWAYS wanted...a mkIV! Now, I know the words 'fuel economy' and 'Supra' don't generally fit in the same sentence but I just want to know the figures while I'm in the research phase! I will be using the car as a daily driver and can't decide between a manual NA or an auto TT. Is there a vast difference in economy between the 2? If any1 could shed a little light on MPG figures they actually get I'd be greatful. I've found some official figures but they seem a little vague! My daily commute is about 15 miles round trip, about 6 of those are motorway, the rest on 40mph town roads. Thanks in advance guys. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lbm Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tooquicktostop Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 I am selling my Civic SiR soon and am coming over to the dark side and buying the car I've ALWAYS wanted...a mkIV! Now, I know the words 'fuel economy' and 'Supra' don't generally fit in the same sentence but I just want to know the figures while I'm in the research phase! I will be using the car as a daily driver and can't decide between a manual NA or an auto TT. Is there a vast difference in economy between the 2? If any1 could shed a little light on MPG figures they actually get I'd be greatful. I've found some official figures but they seem a little vague! My daily commute is about 15 miles round trip, about 6 of those are motorway, the rest on 40mph town roads. Thanks in advance guys. 15 mile round trip, thats nothing, a gallon a day at worse, a lot depends on how you drive it, lotsof info on MPG if you use the search above Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjy Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 If you get a TT, you WILL be using them. lol Therefore, your MPG will be worse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lbm Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 Ok. I'm over it now. Drive like a 17 year old, hard and fast, you'll get 18 MPG or worse. Drive like a chap who takes pride in his pipe and slippers you'll get in the high 20s. Probably 22-23mpg on average, for either N/A ot TT. On motorway journeys, it quite possible to get 30+ MPG, unless you're giving it some beans Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Si_s Supe Posted April 15, 2009 Author Share Posted April 15, 2009 LOL, I understand that having a TT will offer the sweet temptation of flooring it everywhere! But, if I just potter it to and from work, will it be OKish on fuel?? So is the difference between NA and TT vast?? I'm working on the assumption that the NA will have to work harder than the TT to get up to speed and so will be less economical that you'd expect?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Si_s Supe Posted April 15, 2009 Author Share Posted April 15, 2009 Ok. I'm over it now. Drive like a 17 year old, hard and fast, you'll get 18 MPG or worse. Drive like a chap who takes pride in his pipe and slippers you'll get in the high 20s. Probably 22-23mpg on average, for either N/A ot TT. On motorway journeys, it quite possible to get 30+ MPG, unless you're giving it some beans Well 22-23 mpg is around what I expected for NA I guess but alot better than I expected for TT! That has got me thinking now!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tooquicktostop Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 (edited) Its been said before but if MPG really matters to you for a short trip like yours you need to get another type of car, wait till you need tyres, service and parts Edited April 15, 2009 by tooquicktostop (see edit history) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lbm Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 (edited) Well 22-23 mpg is around what I expected for NA I guess but alot better than I expected for TT! That has got me thinking now!! TT Do it You can thank me later. Cash is normally is my preferred method. Edited April 15, 2009 by Lbm (see edit history) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveR Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 My BPU TT averages about 21-22mpg, including a mixture of roads and the *ahem* odd occasion of driving her like she's stolen... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlanM Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 The number of times I have set off on a journey full of good intentions and just at pottering speed and then in about 4 or 5 miles ............... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lbm Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 The number of times I have set off on a journey full of good intentions and just at pottering speed and then in about 4 or 5 miles ............... So true Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
den1 Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 I don't think the Supra is the sort of car to be driving if your at all concerned about fuel economy. A better idea (If you can!), is to get an economical runaround and save the Supra for after work entertainment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Si_s Supe Posted April 15, 2009 Author Share Posted April 15, 2009 I don't think the Supra is the sort of car to be driving if your at all concerned about fuel economy. A better idea (If you can!), is to get an economical runaround and save the Supra for after work entertainment. That's crossed my mind but by the time I've insured / taxed / maintained / ran a 2nd car I'd be better off just running the Supra! Of course I'm not hell bent on getting a good fuel economy...I'm not silly and know full well it's going to be juicy...just want to be armed with as much info before making my decision!! If the NA was loads better then I'd go for it but seeing as it seems to be a close run thing, the TT is seeming quite attractive! Another thing, is it possible to retro fit cruise control?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiamB1434 Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 lol, i get arround 200-250 per tank and i've done the rear 265/35 r18's in less than 2weeks this cars gonna cost me oh and i put in arround 150pw petrol not to mention the £2400 insurance costs, hahaha worth it tho oh its n/a auto lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spike3.0 Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 (edited) If your SIR is like mine it will be fairly similar to the N/A... Not far off the same speed either, I'd get the TT if you want a major difference Edited April 15, 2009 by Spike3.0 (see edit history) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
den1 Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 I don't know you know..... I am wondering if Sky insurance ..or someone will do an affordable 2 car policy . Having a daily runaround will allow you to keep the Supra in A1 condition and give you the benefit of not having to rush any jobs you might want to do on it. You will be able to look forward to driving it more, rather than worrying about who is going to scratch it in the office/works..etc car park. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
den1 Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 Mind you..If you are 24 years old this year I don't know what the Insurance would cost:) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Si_s Supe Posted April 15, 2009 Author Share Posted April 15, 2009 lol, i get arround 200-250 per tank and i've done the rear 265/35 r18's in less than 2weeks this cars gonna cost me oh and i put in arround 150pw petrol not to mention the £2400 insurance costs, hahaha worth it tho oh its n/a auto lol If you have done your rears that quick I'm guessing you go everywhere sideways!! I've been there, done that and left those days behind with my 200sx!! Got caught by plod too many times!! If your SIR is like mine it will be fairly similar to the N/A... Not far off the same speed either, I'd get the TT if you want a major difference Granted the SiR's are rapid...love mine but for me its all about the sexy looks of the Supra! A TT would be an added bonus but the NA I'm sure (I hope) would be quick enough to keep me happy!! I don't know you know..... I am wondering if Sky insurance ..or someone will do an affordable 2 car policy . Having a daily runaround will allow you to keep the Supra in A1 condition and give you the benefit of not having to rush any jobs you might want to do on it. You will be able to look forward to driving it more, rather than worrying about who is going to scratch it in the office/works..etc car park. That would be an ideal scenario for me!! Mind you..If you are 24 years old this year I don't know what the Insurance would cost:) I was 24 in Feb, had quotes on Supras...JDM TT £632 fully comp. and the NA £545 fully comp! Currently paying £880 on the SiR! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Si_s Supe Posted April 15, 2009 Author Share Posted April 15, 2009 Also, what are the NA auto's like?? Part of me does fancy an auto just for the smooth easy drive...but will it be a bit gutless?? Never been in 1! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian R Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 Also, what are the NA auto's like?? Part of me does fancy an auto just for the smooth easy drive...but will it be a bit gutless?? Never been in 1! IMO not much in it between a TT and NA auto up to 60 the TT comes into its own from speed limits that are above legal. I have both a single Turbo manual and a NA auto and the Na is actually more fun on a day to day drive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeoFuture Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 If you have done your rears that quick I'm guessing you go everywhere sideways!! I've been there, done that and left those days behind with my 200sx!! Got caught by plod too many times!! Granted the SiR's are rapid...love mine but for me its all about the sexy looks of the Supra! A TT would be an added bonus but the NA I'm sure (I hope) would be quick enough to keep me happy!! That would be an ideal scenario for me!! I was 24 in Feb, had quotes on Supras...JDM TT £632 fully comp. and the NA £545 fully comp! Currently paying £880 on the SiR! you cant go sideways in an NA !!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian R Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 you cant go sideways in an NA !!! Oh yes you can !!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaz6002 Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 you cant go sideways in an NA !!! You can if you can drive !!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeoFuture Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 you cant its got a fiesta engine i know i have one Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.