CJ Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 Unless he thinks thirty is old, which he shouldn't if he has 2 kids. Is there an age limit to having children then? As in you cannot be younger than X? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TurboTomo Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 The turtle's right. and i had my kids a bit young, i am infact only 20. i am awair that 30 is prob not to old. but used it for resons explained in the last post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marc_p Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 Is there an age limit to having children then? As in you cannot be younger than X? No i'm just saying that your usually at least twenty when you have kids and at twenty you don't see people who are thirty as "old". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garethr Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 What I don't understand is that I constantly see stories like this one. The police seem to be incapable of using the law to deal with four men who: -- had 69 complaints about them including threats to kill, battery, street fighting, slashing tyres, domestic abuse, fraud, drink driving, disorderly behaviour, and drug possession with intent to supply -- invaded the home of a disabled neighbour for up to six months, smashing the door down if it was locked, and stole his possessions -- caused three families to move and have to resort to an ASBO. However, show them an innocent member of the public who didn't even have anything in his possession which resembled a gun, and he gets the full arrest, fingerprints, DNA swab, and record of being "arrested on suspicion of a firearms offence" treatment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marc_p Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 What I don't understand is that I constantly see stories like this one. The police seem to be incapable of using the law to deal with four men who: -- had 69 complaints about them including threats to kill, battery, street fighting, slashing tyres, domestic abuse, fraud, drink driving, disorderly behaviour, and drug possession with intent to supply -- invaded the home of a disabled neighbour for up to six months, smashing the door down if it was locked, and stole his possessions -- caused three families to move and have to resort to an ASBO. However, show them an innocent member of the public who didn't even have anything in his possession which resembled a gun, and he gets the full arrest, fingerprints, DNA swab, and record of being "arrested on suspicion of a firearms offence" treatment. There doesn't really seem to be any logic to how the police work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lbm Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 The turtle's right. Classic! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJ Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 Classic! I've been called worse Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoboblio Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 I think people are being far too harsh on the police for this. The only two things I can see that are wrong are; > His DNA will stay on the database > He will have on his record that he was arrested on suspision of a firearms offence. Other than that, they got a (completely wrong) complaint from a member of the public that he had a gun, which they have an obligation to take 100% seriously. The misleading headline that he was arrested 'for listening to an MP3 player' should read 'bus bystander should've gone to specsavers'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJ Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 I think people are being far too harsh on the police for this. The only two things I can see that are wrong are; > His DNA will stay on the database > He will have on his record that he was arrested on suspision of a firearms offence. Other than that, they got a (completely wrong) complaint from a member of the public that he had a gun, which they have an obligation to take 100% seriously. The misleading headline that he was arrested 'for listening to an MP3 player' should read 'bus bystander should've gone to specsavers'. So are you telling me that if it was you who was arrested, you would be happy to have that on your record? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorin Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 He can apply to have his DNA removed from the database I believe, and as he was never charged with anything he doesn't have a criminal record and doesn't have to declare anything to future employers etc. etc. TurboTomo rocks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoboblio Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 So are you telling me that if it was you who was arrested, you would be happy to have that on your record? I think people are being far too harsh on the police for this. The only two things I can see that are wrong are; > His DNA will stay on the database > He will have on his record that he was arrested on suspision of a firearms offence. Did you miss that bit? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJ Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 Did you miss that bit? I apologise profusely. I put it down to having aged eyes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lbm Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 I apologise profusely. I put it down to having aged eyes You must be over 30 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TurboTomo Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 TurboTomo rocks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoboblio Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 I apologise profusely. I put it down to having aged eyes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJ Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 You must be over 30 Just a tad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
creative Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 I apologise profusely. I put it down to having aged eyes sure your blue mask didnt slip? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJ Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 sure your blue mask didnt slip? Hey, watch it. As has been previously mentioned, "the turtle is always right"! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daston Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 crap I should be locked up every time I go paintballing then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dwayne Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 very nice mate. i used to collect airsoft till they stopped the general public from buying them. probably because of all the kids buying them and waving them around in public. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dannypunto Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 no way, i know this guy!! used to live the corner from me , small world Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TurboTomo Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 Being an infantary soldier i get to play with an sa-80 mk2 most days Now thats a firearm I also get to play with my lil 9mm pistol that's cool also But there is nothing better then over arming that L109 HE frag hand granade. Any why. this is well off topic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt H Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 When i was a kid, we used to run around the street with cap guns pretending to kill each other, then we would probably pretend to shoot the tyre off a car driving up the road, did it in wales on our campsite loads..... Dont ever remeber getting done for having an imitation firearm, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt H Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 And you keep the lighter in the car just in case you need to light a cigarette and have forgotten to bring another lighter do you? It's an offense to have an imitation firearm in public, and just happening to have one in the car raises further suspicion. It's against the law, I wouldn't say it's harsh at all. Perhaps they'd seen some of your posts and they did you for crimes against English as well though? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TurboTomo Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 I think.. the first one MIGHT just be sarcasm???... But dont call me on that one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now