Stevie72 Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 I agree with this time, I think I could just beat it though. I ran the Evo 1 video above simultaneously with my vid and mine was quicker, and thats was on a poor road surface, slightly bald rear tyres, and a poorish start. You tube it then my friend? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matt k Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 Who on here has owned both an n/a and TT to compare the 2 cars? That would be the best way to get a comparison imho. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wez Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 Who on here has owned both an n/a and TT to compare the 2 cars? I got an NA auto and a 6 speed single, the NA is great for going shopping and getting to work Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supra-Brett Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 Im no youngster...sunny Jim.. . How old are you then ? I dont mean to sound funny or anything but your posts dont seem to be written by an Oldie . The words/phrases highlighted below just dont seem to have come from anyone older than about 20. And thats not old. As far as mods go, im running 18" wheels with 265/35/18's on the rear, 2nd decated with 5" stainless steel exhaust and HKS filter... nothing special. But the engine is so smooth and runs like new, very responsive. Last week I beat a WRX turbo all the way to 120 leptons off the line with him chasing on my rear arch until I backed off. It seems to draw a lot of attention at night. Don't get me wrong, I don't go out racing every night, or thrash my car about, generally I drive very safely and just cruise along. I felt I had to do this 0-60 test because I would have been really disappointed if it did it in 7 seconds. Two of my cousins have WRX turbo's and they are quite fast, my bimma eats them for lunch. This one may have been a dudd one, if so, the guy in the scooby lied to me.... So come on, lets know how old you are. It may not add much credability to your claims , but in a funny sort of way some people just trust what older people say, because they know that older people were young once and have learnt from past mistakes. Basically what im saying is that generally younger people tend to blag/brag more than old people. A bit of evidence to back up the very low 0 to 60 claims wouldnt go a-miss either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supra-Brett Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 Spot on! 100 shot. And it makes the car a totally different beast.... Is that your N/A then with the hundred shot of NOS ? Do you drive it every day ? How many miles have you done in it ? Ever had any problems because of the NOS ? Who installed it ? How much ? etc etc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miko_supra Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 Who on here has owned both an n/a and TT to compare the 2 cars? That would be the best way to get a comparison imho. i have concluded the tt is faster Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matt k Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 I got an NA auto and a 6 speed single, the NA is great for going shopping and getting to work I've owned an n/a, stock uk tt, full bpu & T04R all autos and each one a world apart from the other, I will say that i think a lot of n/a owners live in a dream world with some of the performance figures that they come out with, my n/a couldn't beat 330ci's, yet my stock tt could pull away from M3's and BPU it was much quicker than a M3. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevie72 Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 I've owned an n/a, stock uk tt, full bpu & T04R all autos and each one a world apart from the other, I will say that i think a lot of n/a owners live in a dream world with some of the performance figures that they come out with, my n/a couldn't beat 330ci's, ''yet my stock tt could pull away from M3's'' and BPU it was much quicker than a M3. Quote ''Even an Evo M3?'' - i got beat the other day - he couldn't have been stock, but i did have two fat buggers in the car with me, so probably another 200kg! He only pulled away a little, but thought i would have over taken!! To say i was disappointed is an understatement! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
razza Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 you must have one of the quickest N/A's around to reach that time i was on a meet yesterday and i can tell you i got leatherd by4 TT from a start and a stock TT does around a 5 sec 60mph time and i was a good 2 sec behind them so unless it has nos or a heavly modded motor it just aint poss Brett had a similar run in with a tt lol! Sounds a bit quick for an n/a though, also had another test between a tt and an n/a coming off the lights onto a slip road, as soon as number 2 comes in he was toast, so good 1-2 seconds behind... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supradriver Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 Type 2+2 FHC Designer Number of doors 2 dimensions & weight Wheelbase 2550 mm 100.4 in Track front 1520 mm 59.8 in rear 1525 mm 60 in Length 4520 mm 178 in Width 1810 mm 71.3 in Height 1275 mm 50.2 in Length:wheelbase ratio 1.77 Ground clearance 130 mm 5.1 in Kerb weight 1430 kg 3153 lb Weight distribution (Front) Fuel capacity 70 litres 15.4 UK Gal 18.5 US Gal aerodynamics Drag coefficient Frontal Area Cx engine Code Manufacturer Toyota Type S-6 DOHC 24 valves total 4 valves per cylinder Main bearings Construction Bore × stroke 86.00mm × 86.00mm 3.39 in × 3.39 in Bore/Stroke ratio 1 Displacement 2997 cc (182.888 cu in) Unitary capacity 499.5 cc/cylinder Compression ratio 10.00:1 Fuel system EFi Aspiration Normal Compressor type N/A Intercooler None Catalytic Converter Y Max. output (JIS) 228.1 PS (225.0 bhp) (167.8 kW) @6000 rpm Max. torque (JIS) 284.0 Nm (209 lbft) (29 kgm) @4800 rpm Maximum rpm Coolant Water Specific output 75.1 bhp/litre 1.23 bhp/cu in Specific torque 94.76 Nm/litre performance Note: A value of -1 means that the car cannot attain that speed. 0-50mph (80 km/h) 0-60mph 5.9s 0-100km/h 0-100mph 80-120km/h (50-70mph) in top 0-Quarter-mile 0-Kilometre Top speed Fuel Consumption CO2 Emissions Carfolio Calculated CO2 ? Power-to-weight 157.34 bhp/ton Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supradriver Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 Type 2+2 FHC Designer Number of doors 2 dimensions & weight Wheelbase 2550 mm 100.4 in Track front 1520 mm 59.8 in rear 1525 mm 60 in Length 4520 mm 178 in Width 1810 mm 71.3 in Height 1275 mm 50.2 in Length:wheelbase ratio 1.77 Ground clearance 130 mm 5.1 in Kerb weight 1430 kg 3153 lb Weight distribution (Front) Fuel capacity 70 litres 15.4 UK Gal 18.5 US Gal aerodynamics Drag coefficient Frontal Area Cx engine Code Manufacturer Toyota Type S-6 DOHC 24 valves total 4 valves per cylinder Main bearings Construction Bore × stroke 86.00mm × 86.00mm 3.39 in × 3.39 in Bore/Stroke ratio 1 Displacement 2997 cc (182.888 cu in) Unitary capacity 499.5 cc/cylinder Compression ratio 10.00:1 Fuel system EFi Aspiration Normal Compressor type N/A Intercooler None Catalytic Converter Y Max. output (JIS) 228.1 PS (225.0 bhp) (167.8 kW) @6000 rpm Max. torque (JIS) 284.0 Nm (209 lbft) (29 kgm) @4800 rpm Maximum rpm Coolant Water Specific output 75.1 bhp/litre 1.23 bhp/cu in Specific torque 94.76 Nm/litre performance Note: A value of -1 means that the car cannot attain that speed. 0-50mph (80 km/h) 0-60mph 5.9s 0-100km/h 0-100mph 80-120km/h (50-70mph) in top 0-Quarter-mile 0-Kilometre Top speed Fuel Consumption CO2 Emissions Carfolio Calculated CO2 ? Power-to-weight 157.34 bhp/ton This site was not complete Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevie72 Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 So not as fast at a TT, but we knew that anyway!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supradriver Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 So not as fast at a TT, but we knew that anyway!! I think we all new that any way but that was not his question. I am answering the original question Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supra-Brett Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 I think we all new that any way but that was not his question. I am answering the original question Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobSheffield Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 Im not sure its 5.9.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dr_blackman Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 Can't believe this thread is still going lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supra_aero Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 Can't believe this thread is still going lol me either entertaining yet pointless Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supra-Brett Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 Can't believe this thread is still going lol Its almost been going as long as it would take an N/A to reach 60 Eh !! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 Its almost been going as long as it would take an N/A to reach 60 Eh !! B'dum tish! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miko_supra Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 Its almost been going as long as it would take an N/A to reach 60 Eh !! wheeey!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dr_blackman Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 pmsl Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supradriver Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9,Its not 5.9, my N/A is 6s so not far off that 5.9s iv got a video im trying too post it up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supra_aero Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 my N/A is 6s so not far off that 5.9s iv got a video im trying too post it up Hmmm the evidence may be coming at long last. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supra-Brett Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 Hmmm the evidence may be coming at long last. Remember to press fast forward:p Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 my N/A is 6s so not far off that 5.9s iv got a video im trying too post it up Still in km/h? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.