Scott Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 here you go, notice at 13.5 sec the speedo at 75, remember I started late on 4 sec's. 9 seconds my ASS! put it on youtube just for you. http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=DITTFyJC4n8 Very late 4 sec start very late 11 sec finish IMO. Around 7 seconds i'd say. Certainly nowhere near 6 and no chance of being into high 5's. Certainly not 9 seconds. Who said that? Scott =op Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SILKYSMOOTH Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 Very late 4 sec start very late 11 sec finish IMO. Around 7 seconds i'd say. Certainly nowhere near 6 and no chance of being into high 5's. Certainly not 9 seconds. Who said that? Scott =op Youtube is a bit lame, regarding the accuracy of the time, on my original video you would think it's 3.75sec start but as I said earlier, I accellerated and then came off quickly and back on again because I thought I started early so lost acceleration time. If you thought the evo 1 time was 7 seconds run them together. This particular 0-60 vid was calculated at no more than 6.42 sec and that's if I am being really honest. was a mid 4 sec start and a late 10 sec finish. Stevie72 said it was 9 seconds but in his defence he may have been joking or just being sarcastic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SILKYSMOOTH Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v448/ipalatt/die_thread_die.jpg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
razza Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 one more time, I'm not trying to patronise, BUT YOUR SPEEDO WON'T BE ACCURATE:taped: not a personal attack, just a statement of fact;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TonyP Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevie72 Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 I timed it at 7.099444 seconds. That was with a delayed reaction time of 0.00087 seconds and a thumb resistence of 0.122 seconds. I can therefore confirm the time as 7.099444 seconds. Well done that N/A Man Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SILKYSMOOTH Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 I timed it at 7.099444 seconds. That was with a delayed reaction time of 0.00087 seconds and a thumb resistence of 0.122 seconds. I can therefore confirm the time as 7.099444 seconds. Well done that N/A Man That's not entirely accurate. There are 14 frames per seconds, I used 3/14 on the start of 4 sec, and 9/14 of a sec on 10 sec. You do that math.....and remember, I have had much better times than this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorin Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 Please god, somebody stop them! You called. How can i help:D It's been brought to my attention that someone is claiming to be me. Please cease and desist. This thread rocks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonahjones26 Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 That's not entirely accurate. There are 14 frames per seconds, I used 3/14 on the start of 4 sec, and 9/14 of a sec on 10 sec. You do that math.....and remember, I have had much better times than this. I timed it at 7.099444 seconds. That was with a delayed reaction time of 0.00087 seconds and a thumb resistence of 0.122 seconds. I can therefore confirm the time as 7.099444 seconds. Well done that N/A Man I am going back to work now.........bye bye! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaz6002 Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 It's been brought to my attention that someone is claiming to be me. Please cease and desist. This thread rocks. in all seriousness though, why don't you guys call up a magazine, get them to time you and put your money where your mouth is. I'm sure we could tempt some of the turbo lads out to play as well. I dare ya Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobSheffield Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 I timed it at 7.099444 seconds. That was with a delayed reaction time of 0.00087 seconds and a thumb resistence of 0.122 seconds. I can therefore confirm the time as 7.099444 seconds. Well done that N/A Man That's not entirely accurate. There are 14 frames per seconds, I used 3/14 on the start of 4 sec, and 9/14 of a sec on 10 sec. You do that math.....and remember, I have had much better times than this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SILKYSMOOTH Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b261/RobSheffield/pianonolo2.gif Excellent, thats brilliant I bet you took all day to find that:p Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lbm Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 Excellent, thats brilliant I bet you took all day to find that:p I bet it didn't Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
razza Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 I bet it didn't probably only about 5.9 secs, with a delayed internet search button of course;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobSheffield Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 I have special mods on my keyboard, i found it in 3.7 seconds and beat a WRX Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lbm Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 I have special mods on my keyboard, i found it in 3.7 seconds and beat a WRX video evidence please Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rays the roof Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 I am about to contact the club to see if we can invest in a GPS system. This can be used by members at drag and track events to see what real 0-60 times etc are. Wish me luck!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobSheffield Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 video evidence please I do have some, but i cant post it up..... In any event, the video only shows my screen while you can hear me rev up my keyboard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Class One Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 I am about to contact the club to see if we can invest in a GPS system. This can be used by members at drag and track events to see what real 0-60 times etc are. Wish me luck!! The timing equipment at pod is quite accurate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 That's not entirely accurate. There are 14 frames per seconds, I used 3/14 on the start of 4 sec, and 9/14 of a sec on 10 sec. You do that math.....and remember, I have had much better times than this. Your speedo at 60mph will be out by around 5mph so you probably did manage 0-55 in 6.5 sec. Scott =op Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lbm Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 I do have some, but i cant post it up..... In any event, the video only shows my screen while you can hear me rev up my keyboard What exhaust have you got fitted to to your keyboard? Mine's a Blitz QWERTY-Spec Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scooter Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 I've been looking at the figures for Lust2luv's NA i believe thats easily a sub 7 sec's to 60 on the (14.885sec) pod run........i put it at approx 1.3-4 secs slower to 60 than the TT's figures i've used in the above quarter mile comparisons..... So stock uk TT approx 5.3 Lust2luv's (fastest na recorded down the strip) 6.6/7 Alll imo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevie72 Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 With caustic cillit bang co-effecient lag at 0.27 - 23% would induce a further loss of time, equating to approx 0.00029 of a second. Bang and the Engine is gone. rlinney.users.btopenworld.com/sup_info.htm 0-60mph 6.5 and top speed of 143mph - sounds about right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supra_aero Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 What exhaust have you got fitted to to your keyboard? Mine's a Blitz QWERTY-Spec thats hilarious you guys are so silly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homer Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 If any NA owners in the Reading area want to borrow a decent accelerometer to record some accurate times, you're quite welcome to borrow mine. Provided it fixed correctly it's extremely accurate Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.