jevansio Posted December 23, 2007 Share Posted December 23, 2007 I remember everyone making a big fuss when he pops the bonnet & it's a NA engine, but where are they technically wrong, all he says is 'its a 2JZ', not a '2JZ-GTE', or has this been covered many times before Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamesmark Posted December 23, 2007 Share Posted December 23, 2007 Yes it has been covered, and they were technically correct by only saying 2JZ. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr lover Posted December 23, 2007 Share Posted December 23, 2007 my misses just said to thats a non turbo engine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest mk47 Posted December 23, 2007 Share Posted December 23, 2007 dunno Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miko_supra Posted December 23, 2007 Share Posted December 23, 2007 what channel is it on now? or is this just a random discussion Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jevansio Posted December 23, 2007 Author Share Posted December 23, 2007 Itv4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jevansio Posted December 23, 2007 Author Share Posted December 23, 2007 Make that IVT2, I'm drunk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Posted December 23, 2007 Share Posted December 23, 2007 Isn't it that he's like "Holy shit! A 2JZ!" ? Like wtf else would you expect to find in a MkIV Supra? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jevansio Posted December 23, 2007 Author Share Posted December 23, 2007 I dunno, I just remember a big stink at the time about how little the people who made this film knew about Supra's, watching it now it seems like they knew more about it than most people give them credit for Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Posted December 23, 2007 Share Posted December 23, 2007 Well, being surprised to find a 2JZ in a MkIV Supra doesn't show a great deal of knowledge about them, does it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mathew Posted December 23, 2007 Share Posted December 23, 2007 haha the oldman is watching this! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jevansio Posted December 23, 2007 Author Share Posted December 23, 2007 Well, being surprised to find a 2JZ in a MkIV Supra doesn't show a great deal of knowledge about them, does it. It's not the fact that it contains a 2JZ, it's the stink that was kicked up at the time, mocking the film & the film makers about their lacking knowledge of the cars that they were dealing with. Yes we all know the a MKIV will contain soe sort of 2JZ, what I remember most is the comments along the lines of 'haaaaaa did they not know that's a NA engine not a turbo engine, the ****king muppets' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jevansio Posted December 23, 2007 Author Share Posted December 23, 2007 Well, being surprised to find a 2JZ in a MkIV Supra doesn't show a great deal of knowledge about them, does it. It's not the fact that it contains a 2JZ, it's the stink that was kicked up at the time, mocking the film & the film makers about their lacking knowledge of the cars that they were dealing with. Yes we all know the a MKIV will contain soe sort of 2JZ, what I remember most is the comments along the lines of 'haaaaaa did they not know that's a NA engine not a turbo engine, the ****king muppets' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jevansio Posted December 23, 2007 Author Share Posted December 23, 2007 And I'll say it a 3rd time for those who were not listeneing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SimonB Posted December 23, 2007 Share Posted December 23, 2007 It's not the fact that it contains a 2JZ, it's the stink that was kicked up at the time, mocking the film & the film makers about their lacking knowledge of the cars that they were dealing with. Yes we all know the a MKIV will contain soe sort of 2JZ, what I remember most is the comments along the lines of 'haaaaaa did they not know that's a NA engine not a turbo engine, the ****king muppets' Yeah, and the next time you see it it's magically turned into a TT engine, and Vin Diesel is fitting an intercooler upside down... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Posted December 23, 2007 Share Posted December 23, 2007 It's not the fact that it contains a 2JZ, it's the stink that was kicked up at the time, mocking the film & the film makers about their lacking knowledge of the cars that they were dealing with. Yes we all know the a MKIV will contain soe sort of 2JZ, what I remember most is the comments along the lines of 'haaaaaa did they not know that's a NA engine not a turbo engine, the ****king muppets'I'll have to take your word for it. I don't recall any kicking of stinks but then I've never actually seen the film and didn't own a Supra at the time the movie came out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jevansio Posted December 24, 2007 Author Share Posted December 24, 2007 Yeah, and the next time you see it it's magically turned into a TT engine, and Vin Diesel is fitting an intercooler upside down... This is exectly the thing I'm on about, you're taking the micky out the film, yet what if they did remove the NA engine & replace it with a TT lump, you seem to infer the film makers are idiots, yet we all know there are various people who have taken an NA car and replaced the engine with a TT engine. If in fitting an NA-TT conversion the only mistake they made was fitting a FMIC upsidedown, then they'll do a lot better than some of the ex-traders on here Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael Posted December 24, 2007 Share Posted December 24, 2007 They used Craig Lieberman as a "Picture Vehicle Technical Advisor" for both films but I guess he didn't have control over the cringeworthy bits http://www.megaboost.co.uk/misc/fun/TFTF/19.jpg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jevansio Posted December 24, 2007 Author Share Posted December 24, 2007 They used Craig Lieberman as a "Picture Vehicle Technical Advisor" for both films but I guess he didn't have control over the cringeworthy bits http://www.megaboost.co.uk/misc/fun/TFTF/19.jpg Cringe???? At all times I was proud to be a Supra owner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jevansio Posted December 24, 2007 Author Share Posted December 24, 2007 Micheal, you've got me going through the other 18 photos now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael Posted December 24, 2007 Share Posted December 24, 2007 Cringe???? At all times I was proud to be a Supra owner It was more the driving related stuff, racing on part throttle, floors falling out, danger to the manifold and the 19843 gear changes - the cars were acceptable Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael Posted December 24, 2007 Share Posted December 24, 2007 Micheal, you've got me going through the other 18 photos now There are 31 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jevansio Posted December 24, 2007 Author Share Posted December 24, 2007 It was more the driving related stuff, racing on part throttle, floors falling out, danger to the manifold and the 19843 gear changes - the cars were acceptable You've not got a "Danger to Manifold" gauge, bloody hell, that's got to be the most important gauge after boost, afr, egt, oil temp, water temp, fuel press, low fuel, Top Gear start time, etc etc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.