supraguye Posted December 13, 2007 Share Posted December 13, 2007 Guys, Are there any adverse effects to putting a bottle per full tank? Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gaz1 Posted December 13, 2007 Share Posted December 13, 2007 Guys, Are there any adverse effects to putting a bottle per full tank? Thanks no but it should be 3 bottles to a tank usualy, i sometimes use it for track days or dyno runs as a bit of a safegaurd, not 100% sure it works well though;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keancy Posted December 13, 2007 Share Posted December 13, 2007 Guys, Are there any adverse effects to putting a bottle per full tank? Thanks Tried it once since I had the car, thought it made it more sluggish then the Super unleaded. IMO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tooquicktostop Posted December 13, 2007 Share Posted December 13, 2007 You car is stock ??, if it is then it is a waste of money over using 97-99 ron fuel, the ECU is slow to adjust as well so constant use would be required and that gets expensive for very little gain IMO anyway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorin Posted December 13, 2007 Share Posted December 13, 2007 Waste of money, snake oil, may decrease performance if anything at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pabs Posted December 13, 2007 Share Posted December 13, 2007 review on 5th gear was that all octane booster actually lost in the region of 2bhp (or was it 2%??) - so I wouldn't bother. I can almost confirm this as well - used it for an RR day with adverse affects - or at least it certainly did NOT do any good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keancy Posted December 13, 2007 Share Posted December 13, 2007 Does anyone here actualy just run normal unleaded, or all on Premium or super unleaded? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sisky Posted December 13, 2007 Share Posted December 13, 2007 i'm running with 10% toluene (have to use something as only have 95RON at pumps here in Ireland) definite improvement ...... hard to get the stuff though and pricey I'd say - its an industrial solvent (basically a RON of 114 on its own).... I'm a chemical engineer so can get it through work... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keancy Posted December 13, 2007 Share Posted December 13, 2007 I'm a chemical engineer so can get it through work... Perhaps I should sneak through our stores and Labs and see if I can find something similar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sisky Posted December 13, 2007 Share Posted December 13, 2007 Perhaps I should sneak through our stores and Labs and see if I can find something similar. exactly what i'm doin,,,,,hope i don't get busted...i'd have a hard time explaining that one away - why i'm sneaking flammable solvent out in bottle a laptop case Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supraguye Posted December 13, 2007 Author Share Posted December 13, 2007 You car is stock ??, if it is then it is a waste of money over using 97-99 ron fuel, the ECU is slow to adjust as well so constant use would be required and that gets expensive for very little gain IMO anyway My car is at BPU. My reason for asking is that ... out here I THINK we have 95 ron fuel and therefore I was interested in determining whether there was any additional performace/safety to be had Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supraguye Posted December 13, 2007 Author Share Posted December 13, 2007 oh... and where it pertains to cost, the sup is not daily driven Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wez Posted December 13, 2007 Share Posted December 13, 2007 They dont work to well if you are already using water/meth 50/50, I got misfires etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sisky Posted December 13, 2007 Share Posted December 13, 2007 My car is at BPU. My reason for asking is that ... out here I THINK we have 95 ron fuel and therefore I was interested in determining whether there was any additional performace/safety to be had prob not the best idea to run the TT on 95.......detonation/pre-ignition..etc your car is a 98 same as mine so VVTI, ya?? I'm told the throttle technology and VVTI is much better w.r.t knock detection and prevention....so it may be much less of a problem.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keancy Posted December 13, 2007 Share Posted December 13, 2007 exactly what i'm doin,,,,,hope i don't get busted...i'd have a hard time explaining that one away - why i'm sneaking flammable solvent out in bottle a laptop case Miss, Miss Sisky took some solvent Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sisky Posted December 13, 2007 Share Posted December 13, 2007 Miss, Miss Sisky took some solvent Rat! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keancy Posted December 13, 2007 Share Posted December 13, 2007 Rat! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supraguye Posted December 13, 2007 Author Share Posted December 13, 2007 prob not the best idea to run the TT on 95.......detonation/pre-ignition..etc your car is a 98 same as mine so VVTI, ya?? I'm told the throttle technology and VVTI is much better w.r.t knock detection and prevention....so it may be much less of a problem.... Yes it is a 98 vvti .... thanks for the pointer re. knock Guess it can't hurt putting in a bottle per tank then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaymdee Posted December 13, 2007 Share Posted December 13, 2007 My car is at BPU. My reason for asking is that ... out here I THINK we have 95 ron fuel and therefore I was interested in determining whether there was any additional performace/safety to be had I'm sure I read that when they quote that a bottle raises the octane by 1 point, they mean 0.1 RON. Therefore to get up to 98RON you'd need to add 30 bottles. Don't think would be good for the engine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Fish Posted December 13, 2007 Share Posted December 13, 2007 ive seen some tests, and most of the supposed octane boosters actually lost engine power so a waste of money IMO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now