"The facts are these, Christakis insists: "About 3.3 million Americans are allergic to nuts, and even more - 6.9 million - are allergic to seafood. However, all told, serious allergic reactions to foods cause just 2,000 hospitalisations a year (out of more than 30 million hospitalisations nationwide). And only 150 people (children and adults) die each year from all food allergies combined."
He adds: "Compare that number with the 50 people who die each year from bee stings, the 100 who die from lightning strikes, and the 45,000 who die in motor vehicle collisions. Or compare it with the 10,000 hospitalisations of children each year for traumatic brain injuries acquired during sports or the 2,000 who drown or the roughly 1,300 who die from gun accidents. We do not see calls to end athletics. There are no doubt thousands of parents who rid their cupboards of peanut butter but not of guns. And more children assuredly die walking or being driven to school each year than die from nut allergies"
____________________________________________________
Just to pick up on these points:
1. The small number of hospitalisations would (or should) be because parents/adults are checking the ingedients of what they or their kids eat, you can avoid food you are alergic to.
2. Just because you are alergic to something doesn't mean you have to die or go to a hospital. Plenty of people are alergic to cats in this country but how many are hospitilised because of cat hair alergies?
3. Last time I checked, 150 of 10.2m is a bigger percentage than 100 out of 300m so why is the author comparing a specialist alergy to an accident that could happen to any living person?
4. 45,000 die in the USA in motor accidents? That is appauling!
5. Every comparison is unavoidable accidents, hardly a good point to base an arguement.