That's todays standards though not those of the early 90's, if this is an OEM replacement I would assume it would only need to conform to the period tests? Cars today are made in a way that they protect pedestrians in the event of a low speed impact, this is the reason why most modern cars that are in such an impact, have to replace parts that are designed to crumple and absorb impact. I can assure you that isn't the case for the supra, some muppet in a car park reversed into my car and his brand new Corsa's bumper crumpled and was scrap whilst the Supra's bumper had not even a scratch to speak of. Given some of impacts I have seen, the Supra is built like a tank and fairs pretty well in some scary accidents. Another reason why most car designs today are boring compared to historic cars who could pretty much design what they wanted! Pedestrian safety, what's that? I always think of the Aston Martin Lagonda 4 door when this topic comes up, imagine being hit by the below at any speed.
I am not disagreeing that given the nature of the item in question, that either some testing is required or as many have said that this designated as for show/off road use only and that is not designed to be used on the road to protect against legal proceedings.