Matt H

Wurst Evar

Not it's me being dumb, I thought i was a 6 speed!

Congrats - must be exciting waiting for it to turn up! Welcome to the club.

There's a TRD version on Toyota World if that's any good? Look really nice IMO (towards the bottom of the page) http://www.trdracing.com/supra/index.htm

Indeed. I've paid ~£3k a year to insure my supra when I was younger and that's when the economy was booming!

Yes you do. And it some cases it's worth having to talk to Ollie on the phone for!

I think Ollies best.

That was a much better response. It didn't seem to contain any uneccessary jibes. I agree that dealing with a company that gives you an honest answer is important - of course. But your honest answers are often filled with emotion, rather that pure facts. It is not my opinion that some people do not want to deal with you - that is fact. Feel free to point out something wrong, but do it in an amicable way.

True - there is probably a financial insentive for it now too. I bet some news brands would pay a fair sum for a 'new leak'.

Why can't you do it in an amicable manner though? You're representing a company?

Custom. There are few people on here that I know wouldn't even bother with dealings with you. There's only a few that I know of, but in such a volatile climate, I would have though everyone counts. You don't do Sky's image any favours. Maybe it's different at Sky, but if I spoke to clients or potential clients like you do I'd be gone long ago. There are numerous other traders on here that seem to be able to remain neutral and proffesional - at least most of the time. If someone goes close to bad mouthing Sky, you don't have the ability to form a proffesional response. I find that amazing for a customer services representative. I stick my 'oar' in a lot of threads, it's part of being on the forum. I don't understand why you want to bait someone into complaining about you though - that's bizare. Maybe you feel immune. I was shocked at that post of yours a while back when you posted up someone's person info, where you claimed he had lied on an application.

Another excellent response. Why would I do that? It's your company that's losing out, not me. Just be thankful you don't work for Sky Sports!

Professional and neutral as ever, Ollie - you don't disappoint

Big, big fan: http://www.sport.co.uk/public/georgie-thompson.jpg

Do you need a minimum years no-claims also? I may be wrong but I'm sure I remember reading that somewhere?

Thanks, Steve

I think that too. No probs

Fair enough, I guess a lack of interest in football (like me) actually helps to gauage a fairer opinion of what he is like as a person.

Care to explain to me where you have got from what I've written that I believe Andy Gray should get a harsher sentence no matter what the crime committed is? You'll find that I said, in response to your sweeping 'words into my mouth' statement, that is not what I think. I'll reiterate that I believe that Andy Gray holds more responsibility when it comes to sexism in football, which is why he perhaps got the sack in this instance. Then I went on to state that I actually think this matter runs deeper than just this sexism issue. I've not once said he 'should' have got the sack, nor have I said he should get a harsher sentence for anything. I was merely trying to provide an explanation of why he perhaps did get the sack and that does have a lot to do with his responsibilities at his level.

Ah, insider information. Have you spoken to him before?

That's another broad statement. Andy Gray holds a position of responsibility in the football world, so he's actions will echo much further than those of the mere fan perhaps. If Andy Gray was done for drink driving, I wouldn't expect him to recieve a harsher sentence than me or you, but in the context of sexism in football, Andy Gray has a lot on his shoulders. I actually believe it runs deeper than just this matter though - perhaps a window of opportunity to remove him anyway?

I think the problem is they are in a very responsible position, which is why it is more significant when the person in question is watched by millions.

I understand where you're coming from, but it makes me annoyed to think that some generic, decent person out there that works hard for his / her living may get suckered into this sort of thing thinking it's something it's not because of the smokes and mirrors. They would only to lose out and be simply lining the pockets of some ruthless enterprise with no moral fibre. It doesn't sit well with me that this sort of thing is allowed to happen. The bottom line is, if everyone understood how ridiculous such sites as this are, they wouldn't use them and therefore the site wouldn't exist. So the very fact that they do exist and are running means people are getting suckered in. No doubt it will go down the pan eventually as people wise up, but it won't be without casulties. But at that point, the con artists will be on with their next trick. Edit to add: I guess it's another thing if people use the site and end up being really happy with it and continue using it like they would Amazon or something can't imagine it though!

Is that going to suffice your need for speed though? Lovely car, but no speed demon.

That's naive, because stupid people in their masses will indirectly affect your life. That's one of the reasons control measures are implemented, to stop people from making mistakes that will effect others.